Hi
On Tue, 08 Aug 2023 09:29:45 +0800, Liao Chang wrote:
> Use the dev_err_probe function instead of dev_err in the probe function
> so that the printed messge includes the return value and also handles
> -EPROBE_DEFER nicely.
>
> NOTICE: dev_err_probe always print the second parameter that happens to
> be the return value, hence the return errno will be removed from the
> third parameter to avoid a redundant error message.
>
> [...]
With the messge/message change in the commit log, applied to
i2c/andi-for-next on
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git
Please note that this patch may still undergo further evaluation
and the final decision will be made in collaboration with
Wolfram.
Thank you,
Andi
Patches applied
===============
[1/9] i2c: bcm2835: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
commit: 7aec2f39a1a4be99a7872e2342a69b96396c3e0c
[2/9] i2c: mlxbf: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
commit: 45a7a0524bff52360f82277f165bbdef7a199484
[3/9] i2c: xlp9xx: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
commit: 9a648b3f56c49551081b9560392e9a640aa3d5cb
[4/9] i2c: hisi: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
commit: 3c5e6ae40164ba6af1efaa1ca94e2cdea0c8f25e
[5/9] i2c: qcom-cci: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
commit: 605efbf43813857d8110ca0b5bda75f93426a789
[6/9] i2c: pxa: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
commit: d29066600a85b15077221be404a38d9c4bf5b888
[7/9] i2c: dln2: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
commit: 235712aa7ebf75a8442905ae672c02a4f9f8468c
[8/9] i2c: imx-lpi2c: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
commit: 5d51af11f41eb348d9c3ccb5c74ffa9078673166
[9/9] i2c: synquacer: Use dev_err_probe in probe function
commit: 7a34bab2daeaae6d2f32bdfa20b876a8f210cd7a
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:19:35AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, 08 Aug 2023 09:29:45 +0800, Liao Chang wrote:
> > Use the dev_err_probe function instead of dev_err in the probe function
> > so that the printed messge includes the return value and also handles
> > -EPROBE_DEFER nicely.
> >
> > NOTICE: dev_err_probe always print the second parameter that happens to
> > be the return value, hence the return errno will be removed from the
> > third parameter to avoid a redundant error message.
> >
> > [...]
Applied to for-next (via Andi's branch), thanks!