On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Lizhi Hou wrote:
> The PCI endpoint device such as Xilinx Alveo PCI card maps the register
> spaces from multiple hardware peripherals to its PCI BAR. Normally,
> the PCI core discovers devices and BARs using the PCI enumeration process.
> There is no infrastructure to discover the hardware peripherals that are
> present in a PCI device, and which can be accessed through the PCI BARs.
>
> Apparently, the device tree framework requires a device tree node for the
> PCI device. Thus, it can generate the device tree nodes for hardware
> peripherals underneath. Because PCI is self discoverable bus, there might
> not be a device tree node created for PCI devices. Furthermore, if the PCI
> device is hot pluggable, when it is plugged in, the device tree nodes for
> its parent bridges are required. Add support to generate device tree node
> for PCI bridges.
>
> Add an of_pci_make_dev_node() interface that can be used to create device
> tree node for PCI devices.
>
> Add a PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES config option. When the option is turned on,
> the kernel will generate device tree nodes for PCI bridges unconditionally.
>
> Initially, add the basic properties for the dynamically generated device
> tree nodes which include #address-cells, #size-cells, device_type,
> compatible, ranges, reg.
...
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA) += p2pdma.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND) += xen-pcifront.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VGA_ARB) += vgaarb.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DOE) += doe.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES) += of_property.o
Maybe a bit ordered?
...
> +void of_pci_remove_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> +
> + np = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
CamelCase out of a sudden?!
> + if (!np || !of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DYNAMIC))
Do you need a first check? Shouldn't the second return false for you in such a
case?
> + return;
> + pdev->dev.of_node = NULL;
This will mess up with fwnode, isn't it?
> + of_changeset_revert(np->data);
> + of_changeset_destroy(np->data);
> + of_node_put(np);
> +}
...
> +void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *ppnode, *np = NULL;
> + const char *pci_type;
> + struct of_changeset *cset;
> + const char *name;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * If there is already a device tree node linked to this device,
> + * return immediately.
> + */
> + if (pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev))
> + return;
> +
> + /* Check if there is device tree node for parent device */
> + if (!pdev->bus->self)
While not positive conditional?
> + ppnode = pdev->bus->dev.of_node;
> + else
> + ppnode = pdev->bus->self->dev.of_node;
What about firmware nodes?
> + if (!ppnode)
> + return;
> +
> + if (pci_is_bridge(pdev))
> + pci_type = "pci";
> + else
> + pci_type = "dev";
> +
> + name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s@%x,%x", pci_type,
> + PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
> + if (!name)
> + return;
> +
> + cset = kmalloc(sizeof(*cset), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cset)
> + goto failed;
> + of_changeset_init(cset);
> +
> + np = of_changeset_create_node(ppnode, name, cset);
> + if (!np)
> + goto failed;
> + np->data = cset;
> +
> + ret = of_pci_add_properties(pdev, cset, np);
> + if (ret)
> + goto failed;
> +
> + ret = of_changeset_apply(cset);
> + if (ret)
> + goto failed;
> +
> + pdev->dev.of_node = np;
Firmware node?
> + kfree(name);
> +
> + return;
> +
> +failed:
> + if (np)
Dup check.
> + of_node_put(np);
> + kfree(name);
> +}
...
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
Can it be ordered?
...
> +struct of_pci_addr_pair {
> + u32 phys_addr[OF_PCI_ADDRESS_CELLS];
> + u32 size[OF_PCI_SIZE_CELLS];
> +};
Why not
struct foo {
u32 phys_addr; // why not 64-bit?
u32 size; // same Q, btw
};
struct _pairs {
strict foo pairs[...];
}
?
...
> +struct of_pci_range {
> + u32 child_addr[OF_PCI_ADDRESS_CELLS];
> + u32 parent_addr[OF_PCI_ADDRESS_CELLS];
> + u32 size[OF_PCI_SIZE_CELLS];
> +};
In the similar way?
...
> +enum of_pci_prop_compatible {
> + PROP_COMPAT_PCI_VVVV_DDDD,
> + PROP_COMPAT_PCICLASS_CCSSPP,
> + PROP_COMPAT_PCICLASS_CCSS,
> + PROP_COMPAT_NUM,
No comma for the terminator entry (as far as I got it).
> +};
...
> +static void of_pci_set_address(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 *prop, u64 addr,
> + u32 reg_num, u32 flags, bool reloc)
> +{
> + prop[0] = FIELD_PREP(OF_PCI_ADDR_FIELD_BUS, pdev->bus->number) |
> + FIELD_PREP(OF_PCI_ADDR_FIELD_DEV, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn)) |
> + FIELD_PREP(OF_PCI_ADDR_FIELD_FUNC, PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
> + prop[0] |= flags | reg_num;
No checks? No masks? flags or reg_num may easily / mistakenly rewrite the above.
> + if (!reloc) {
if (reloc)
return;
?
> + prop[0] |= OF_PCI_ADDR_FIELD_NONRELOC;
> + prop[1] = upper_32_bits(addr);
> + prop[2] = lower_32_bits(addr);
> + }
> +}
...
> +static int of_pci_get_addr_flags(struct resource *res, u32 *flags)
> +{
> + u32 ss;
> + if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
> + ss = OF_PCI_ADDR_SPACE_IO;
> + else if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64)
> + ss = OF_PCI_ADDR_SPACE_MEM64;
> + else if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
> + ss = OF_PCI_ADDR_SPACE_MEM32;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
We have ioport.h and respective helpers, can you use them?
resource_type(), for example.
> + *flags = 0;
> + if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH)
> + *flags |= OF_PCI_ADDR_FIELD_PREFETCH;
> +
> + *flags |= FIELD_PREP(OF_PCI_ADDR_FIELD_SS, ss);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
...
> +static int of_pci_prop_bus_range(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + u32 bus_range[] = { pdev->subordinate->busn_res.start,
> + pdev->subordinate->busn_res.end };
Wrong. It won't work on 64-bit resources.
> + return of_changeset_add_prop_u32_array(ocs, np, "bus-range", bus_range,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(bus_range));
> +}
...
> + if (pci_is_bridge(pdev)) {
> + num = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_NUM;
> + res = &pdev->resource[PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES];
> + } else {
> + num = PCI_STD_NUM_BARS;
> + res = &pdev->resource[PCI_STD_RESOURCES];
> + }
Don't we have pci_resource() macro?
...
> + for (i = 0, j = 0; j < num; j++) {
> + if (!resource_size(&res[j]))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (of_pci_get_addr_flags(&res[j], &flags))
> + continue;
> +
> + val64 = res[j].start;
> + of_pci_set_address(pdev, rp[i].parent_addr, val64, 0, flags,
> + false);
> + if (pci_is_bridge(pdev)) {
> + memcpy(rp[i].child_addr, rp[i].parent_addr,
> + sizeof(rp[i].child_addr));
Why simple assignment is not good enough here?
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * For endpoint device, the lower 64-bits of child
> + * address is always zero.
> + */
> + rp[i].child_addr[0] = j;
> + }
> + val64 = resource_size(&res[j]);
Dup. You already called this at the top of the loop, why to repeat?
> + rp[i].size[0] = upper_32_bits(val64);
> + rp[i].size[1] = lower_32_bits(val64);
> +
> + i++;
> + }
...
> +static int of_pci_prop_reg(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct of_changeset *ocs,
> + struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + struct of_pci_addr_pair reg = { 0 };
0 is redundant.
> +
> + /* configuration space */
> + of_pci_set_address(pdev, reg.phys_addr, 0, 0, 0, true);
> +
> + return of_changeset_add_prop_u32_array(ocs, np, "reg", (u32 *)®,
> + sizeof(reg) / sizeof(u32));
> +}
...
> + ret = pci_read_config_byte(pdev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &pin);
> + if (ret != 0)
Why this pattern?
> + return ret;
Are you aware that above can return positive codes, aren't you?
You probably want to translate them to the Linux error codes
Same applies to all generic PCI config space accessors used in
the code.
> + if (!pin)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return of_changeset_add_prop_u32(ocs, np, "interrupts", (u32)pin);
Why casting?
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko