2023-09-12 21:30:19

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] dt-bindings: display: panel: add Fascontek FS035VG158 panel

On 11/09/2023 18:47, John Watts wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:49:39PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> If the other panel has exactly the same case, then yes, you can do like
>> this. But it depends on the bindings - to which ones do you refer as
>> your tmeplate?
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/leadtek,ltk035c5444t.yaml

The file is indeed serving as poor example.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


2023-09-13 05:11:13

by John Watts

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] dt-bindings: display: panel: add Fascontek FS035VG158 panel

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:55:31AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/09/2023 18:47, John Watts wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:49:39PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> If the other panel has exactly the same case, then yes, you can do like
> >> this. But it depends on the bindings - to which ones do you refer as
> >> your tmeplate?
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/leadtek,ltk035c5444t.yaml
>
> The file is indeed serving as poor example.

I'm happy to fix it up according to your response and include it in v2 of the RFC.
Should this be split in to two RFCs- one for cleanup, one for the new panel?

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

John.