hi, Raghu,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:45:18AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 9/12/2023 7:54 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> >
> >
> > hi, Raghu,
> >
> > hope this third performance report for same one patch-set won't annoy you,
> > and better, have some value to you.
>
> Not at all. But thanks a lot and am rather more happy to see this
> exhaustive results.
>
> Because: It is easy to show see that patchset is increasing readability
> of code or maintainance of code etc.,
> while I try my best to see regressions are within noise level for some
> corner cases and some benchmarks have improved noticeably, there is
> always a room to miss something.
> Reports like this, helps to boost confidence on patchset.
>
> Also your cumulative (bisection) report also helped to evaluate
> importance of each patch too..
ok, will keep sending report if any :)
> >
> >
> I hope I can add your tested-by if I need to REBASE the patch for -mm
> tree depending on the feedback I get any further with any minor changes.
sure!
Tested-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
>
>
>