2023-09-21 04:55:48

by Luis Chamberlain

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sysctl tree with the asm-generic tree

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:50:34AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the sysctl tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/ia64/kernel/crash.c
>
> between commit:
>
> cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
>
> from the asm-generic tree and commit:
>
> d2f2ef357794 ("ia64: Remove now superfluous sentinel element from ctl_table array")
>
> from the sysctl tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

Lol, good bye IA64! Glad I got merge conflict to say goodbye.

Luis


2023-09-21 22:27:07

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sysctl tree with the asm-generic tree

Hi Luis,

On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 20:02:23 -0700 Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Lol, good bye IA64! Glad I got merge conflict to say goodbye.

:-)

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature