2023-11-27 13:51:17

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] pmdomain: arm: Avoid polling for scmi_perf_domain

It was a mistake to prefer polling based mode when setting a performance
level for a domain. Let's instead rely on the protocol to decide what is
best and thus avoid polling when possible.

Reported-by: Nikunj Kela <[email protected]>
Fixes: 2af23ceb8624 ("pmdomain: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain")
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c b/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c
index bc3f78abb6da..709bbc448fad 100644
--- a/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ scmi_pd_set_perf_state(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, unsigned int state)
if (!state)
return -EINVAL;

- ret = pd->perf_ops->level_set(pd->ph, pd->domain_id, state, true);
+ ret = pd->perf_ops->level_set(pd->ph, pd->domain_id, state, false);
if (ret)
dev_warn(&genpd->dev, "Failed with %d when trying to set %d perf level",
ret, state);
--
2.34.1


2023-11-27 15:06:21

by Sudeep Holla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pmdomain: arm: Avoid polling for scmi_perf_domain

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 02:50:33PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> It was a mistake to prefer polling based mode when setting a performance
> level for a domain. Let's instead rely on the protocol to decide what is
> best and thus avoid polling when possible.
>
> Reported-by: Nikunj Kela <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 2af23ceb8624 ("pmdomain: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain")

Ah, I hadn't even noticed before :). Anyways,

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>

--
Regards,
Sudeep

2023-11-27 15:34:16

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pmdomain: arm: Avoid polling for scmi_perf_domain

On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 16:05, Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 02:50:33PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > It was a mistake to prefer polling based mode when setting a performance
> > level for a domain. Let's instead rely on the protocol to decide what is
> > best and thus avoid polling when possible.
> >
> > Reported-by: Nikunj Kela <[email protected]>
> > Fixes: 2af23ceb8624 ("pmdomain: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain")
>
> Ah, I hadn't even noticed before :). Anyways,
>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>

Thanks, applied for fixes!

Kind regards
Uffe