Correct to “boundaries” from “bounaries” in “CPUs are grouped according to NUMA bounaries.”
Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst b/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
index 0046af06531a..33c4539155d9 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ Workqueue currently supports the following affinity scopes.
cases. This is the default affinity scope.
``numa``
- CPUs are grouped according to NUMA bounaries.
+ CPUs are grouped according to NUMA boundaries.
``system``
All CPUs are put in the same group. Workqueue makes no effort to process a
--
2.34.1
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:23:17PM +0530, attreyee-muk wrote:
> Correct to “boundaries” from “bounaries” in “CPUs are grouped according to NUMA bounaries.”
>
> Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Jonathan, would you mind taking this patch through doc tree? I don't have
any other wq patches queued for 6.8 and it's a bit awkward to just apply
this one.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Tejun Heo <[email protected]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:23:17PM +0530, attreyee-muk wrote:
>> Correct to “boundaries” from “bounaries” in “CPUs are grouped according to NUMA bounaries.”
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
>
> Jonathan, would you mind taking this patch through doc tree? I don't have
> any other wq patches queued for 6.8 and it's a bit awkward to just apply
> this one.
Sure, will do.
jon