2024-01-11 09:32:44

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -next 0/2] RISC-V: ACPI: Add LPI support

This series adds support for Low Power Idle (LPI) on ACPI based
platforms.

LPI is described in the ACPI spec [1]. RISC-V FFH spec required to
enable this is available at [2].

[1] - https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/08_Processor_Configuration_and_Control.html#lpi-low-power-idle-states
[2] - https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-acpi-ffh/releases/download/v/riscv-ffh.pdf

Sunil V L (2):
ACPI: Enable ACPI_PROCESSOR for RISC-V
cpuidle: RISC-V: Add ACPI LPI support

drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
2.34.1



2024-01-11 09:33:36

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -next 2/2] cpuidle: RISC-V: Add ACPI LPI support

Add required callbacks to support Low Power Idle (LPI) on ACPI based
RISC-V platforms.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
index e8094fc92491..cea67a54ab39 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
@@ -632,3 +632,81 @@ static int __init sbi_cpuidle_init(void)
return 0;
}
device_initcall(sbi_cpuidle_init);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <acpi/processor.h>
+
+#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK 0x1000000000000000ULL
+#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK 0x0FFFFFFF00000000ULL
+
+static int acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
+ struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
+
+ if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * The SBI HSM suspend function is only available when:
+ * 1) SBI version is 0.3 or higher
+ * 2) SBI HSM extension is available
+ */
+ if (sbi_spec_version < sbi_mk_version(0, 3) ||
+ !sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_HSM)) {
+ pr_warn("HSM suspend not available\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (pr->power.count <= 1)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ for (i = 1; i < pr->power.count; i++) {
+ u32 state;
+
+ lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i];
+
+ /* Validate Entry Method as per FFH spec.
+ * bits[63:60] should be 0x1
+ * bits[59:32] should be 0x0
+ * bits[31:0] represent a SBI power_state
+ */
+ if (!(lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK) ||
+ (lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK)) {
+ pr_warn("Invalid LPI entry method %#llx\n", lpi->address);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ state = lpi->address;
+ if (!sbi_suspend_state_is_valid(state)) {
+ pr_warn("Invalid SBI power state %#x\n", state);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
+}
+
+int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
+{
+ u32 state = lpi->address;
+
+ if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
+ return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
+ lpi->index,
+ state);
+ else
+ return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
+ lpi->index,
+ state);
+}
+
+#endif
--
2.34.1


2024-01-11 10:20:10

by Andrew Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] cpuidle: RISC-V: Add ACPI LPI support

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 03:00:58PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Add required callbacks to support Low Power Idle (LPI) on ACPI based
> RISC-V platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> index e8094fc92491..cea67a54ab39 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> @@ -632,3 +632,81 @@ static int __init sbi_cpuidle_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
> device_initcall(sbi_cpuidle_init);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> +
> +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK 0x1000000000000000ULL
> +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK 0x0FFFFFFF00000000ULL

GENMASK might look nicer and the type mask is 0xF000000000000000ULL,
where 0x1000000000000000ULL means that the type is an SBI identifier.
We need both defined

#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK 0xF000000000000000ULL
#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_SBI 0x1000000000000000ULL

as I point out below.

> +
> +static int acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
> + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * The SBI HSM suspend function is only available when:
> + * 1) SBI version is 0.3 or higher
> + * 2) SBI HSM extension is available
> + */
> + if (sbi_spec_version < sbi_mk_version(0, 3) ||
> + !sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_HSM)) {
> + pr_warn("HSM suspend not available\n");

The comment and these lines match what's done in sbi_cpuidle_init().
How about a static helper function to avoid duplication?

> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (pr->power.count <= 1)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < pr->power.count; i++) {
> + u32 state;
> +
> + lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i];
> +
> + /* Validate Entry Method as per FFH spec.
> + * bits[63:60] should be 0x1
> + * bits[59:32] should be 0x0
> + * bits[31:0] represent a SBI power_state
^ an

> + */

Comment block needs opening wing (/*)

> + if (!(lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK) ||

This should be (lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK) != RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_SBI

> + (lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK)) {
> + pr_warn("Invalid LPI entry method %#llx\n", lpi->address);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + state = lpi->address;
> + if (!sbi_suspend_state_is_valid(state)) {
> + pr_warn("Invalid SBI power state %#x\n", state);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
> +{
> + u32 state = lpi->address;
> +
> + if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
> + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> + lpi->index,
> + state);
> + else
> + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> + lpi->index,
> + state);
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Thanks,
drew

2024-01-11 11:33:25

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] cpuidle: RISC-V: Add ACPI LPI support

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:19:49AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 03:00:58PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > Add required callbacks to support Low Power Idle (LPI) on ACPI based
> > RISC-V platforms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> > index e8094fc92491..cea67a54ab39 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> > @@ -632,3 +632,81 @@ static int __init sbi_cpuidle_init(void)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > device_initcall(sbi_cpuidle_init);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
> > +
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> > +
> > +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK 0x1000000000000000ULL
> > +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK 0x0FFFFFFF00000000ULL
>
> GENMASK might look nicer and the type mask is 0xF000000000000000ULL,
> where 0x1000000000000000ULL means that the type is an SBI identifier.
> We need both defined
>
> #define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK 0xF000000000000000ULL
> #define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_SBI 0x1000000000000000ULL
>
Sure. Let me use GENMASK and define both MASK and SBI type.

> as I point out below.
>
> > +
> > +static int acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
> > + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The SBI HSM suspend function is only available when:
> > + * 1) SBI version is 0.3 or higher
> > + * 2) SBI HSM extension is available
> > + */
> > + if (sbi_spec_version < sbi_mk_version(0, 3) ||
> > + !sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_HSM)) {
> > + pr_warn("HSM suspend not available\n");
>
> The comment and these lines match what's done in sbi_cpuidle_init().
> How about a static helper function to avoid duplication?
>
Sure.

> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pr->power.count <= 1)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + for (i = 1; i < pr->power.count; i++) {
> > + u32 state;
> > +
> > + lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i];
> > +
> > + /* Validate Entry Method as per FFH spec.
> > + * bits[63:60] should be 0x1
> > + * bits[59:32] should be 0x0
> > + * bits[31:0] represent a SBI power_state
> ^ an
>
> > + */
>
> Comment block needs opening wing (/*)
>
Okay.

> > + if (!(lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK) ||
>
> This should be (lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK) != RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_SBI
>
Sure.

Let me send v2 in couple of days with these changes.

Thanks!
Sunil

> > + (lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK)) {
> > + pr_warn("Invalid LPI entry method %#llx\n", lpi->address);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + state = lpi->address;
> > + if (!sbi_suspend_state_is_valid(state)) {
> > + pr_warn("Invalid SBI power state %#x\n", state);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + return acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
> > +{
> > + u32 state = lpi->address;
> > +
> > + if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
> > + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> > + lpi->index,
> > + state);
> > + else
> > + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> > + lpi->index,
> > + state);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Thanks,
> drew

2024-01-12 05:05:31

by Anup Patel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] cpuidle: RISC-V: Add ACPI LPI support

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 3:01 PM Sunil V L <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Add required callbacks to support Low Power Idle (LPI) on ACPI based
> RISC-V platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> index e8094fc92491..cea67a54ab39 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> @@ -632,3 +632,81 @@ static int __init sbi_cpuidle_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
> device_initcall(sbi_cpuidle_init);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> +
> +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK 0x1000000000000000ULL
> +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK 0x0FFFFFFF00000000ULL
> +
> +static int acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
> + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * The SBI HSM suspend function is only available when:
> + * 1) SBI version is 0.3 or higher
> + * 2) SBI HSM extension is available
> + */
> + if (sbi_spec_version < sbi_mk_version(0, 3) ||
> + !sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_HSM)) {
> + pr_warn("HSM suspend not available\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (pr->power.count <= 1)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < pr->power.count; i++) {
> + u32 state;
> +
> + lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i];
> +
> + /* Validate Entry Method as per FFH spec.
> + * bits[63:60] should be 0x1
> + * bits[59:32] should be 0x0
> + * bits[31:0] represent a SBI power_state
> + */
> + if (!(lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK) ||
> + (lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK)) {
> + pr_warn("Invalid LPI entry method %#llx\n", lpi->address);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + state = lpi->address;
> + if (!sbi_suspend_state_is_valid(state)) {
> + pr_warn("Invalid SBI power state %#x\n", state);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
> +{
> + u32 state = lpi->address;
> +
> + if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
> + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> + lpi->index,
> + state);
> + else
> + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> + lpi->index,
> + state);
> +}
> +
> +#endif

Lets keep the cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c driver focused on DT only. Instead,
I would suggest moving the required function from cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
to arch/riscv and have a separate driver under driver/acpi/riscv for
LPI states.

Regards,
Anup

2024-01-15 05:07:33

by Sunil V L

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] cpuidle: RISC-V: Add ACPI LPI support

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:35:07AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 3:01 PM Sunil V L <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Add required callbacks to support Low Power Idle (LPI) on ACPI based
> > RISC-V platforms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> > index e8094fc92491..cea67a54ab39 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> > @@ -632,3 +632,81 @@ static int __init sbi_cpuidle_init(void)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > device_initcall(sbi_cpuidle_init);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
> > +
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> > +
> > +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK 0x1000000000000000ULL
> > +#define RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK 0x0FFFFFFF00000000ULL
> > +
> > +static int acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
> > + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The SBI HSM suspend function is only available when:
> > + * 1) SBI version is 0.3 or higher
> > + * 2) SBI HSM extension is available
> > + */
> > + if (sbi_spec_version < sbi_mk_version(0, 3) ||
> > + !sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_HSM)) {
> > + pr_warn("HSM suspend not available\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pr->power.count <= 1)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + for (i = 1; i < pr->power.count; i++) {
> > + u32 state;
> > +
> > + lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i];
> > +
> > + /* Validate Entry Method as per FFH spec.
> > + * bits[63:60] should be 0x1
> > + * bits[59:32] should be 0x0
> > + * bits[31:0] represent a SBI power_state
> > + */
> > + if (!(lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_TYPE_MASK) ||
> > + (lpi->address & RISCV_FFH_LPI_RSVD_MASK)) {
> > + pr_warn("Invalid LPI entry method %#llx\n", lpi->address);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + state = lpi->address;
> > + if (!sbi_suspend_state_is_valid(state)) {
> > + pr_warn("Invalid SBI power state %#x\n", state);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + return acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi)
> > +{
> > + u32 state = lpi->address;
> > +
> > + if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
> > + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> > + lpi->index,
> > + state);
> > + else
> > + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> > + lpi->index,
> > + state);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif
>
> Lets keep the cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c driver focused on DT only. Instead,
> I would suggest moving the required function from cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> to arch/riscv and have a separate driver under driver/acpi/riscv for
> LPI states.
>
Okay, sure. Let me send v2 with your suggestion.

Thanks,
Sunil