At the time they are created unbound workqueues rescuers currently use
cpu_possible_mask as their affinity, but this can be too wide in case a
workqueue unbound mask has been set as a subset of cpu_possible_mask.
Make new rescuers use their associated workqueue unbound cpumask from
the start.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 76e60faed8923..3a1d5a67bd66a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4652,7 +4652,10 @@ static int init_rescuer(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
}
wq->rescuer = rescuer;
- kthread_bind_mask(rescuer->task, cpu_possible_mask);
+ if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
+ kthread_bind_mask(rescuer->task, wq->unbound_attrs->cpumask);
+ else
+ kthread_bind_mask(rescuer->task, cpu_possible_mask);
wake_up_process(rescuer->task);
return 0;
--
2.43.0
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 05:19:27PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> At the time they are created unbound workqueues rescuers currently use
> cpu_possible_mask as their affinity, but this can be too wide in case a
> workqueue unbound mask has been set as a subset of cpu_possible_mask.
>
> Make new rescuers use their associated workqueue unbound cpumask from
> the start.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Apply 1-2 to wq/for-6.9.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Hello,
On 16/01/24 08:47, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 05:19:27PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > At the time they are created unbound workqueues rescuers currently use
> > cpu_possible_mask as their affinity, but this can be too wide in case a
> > workqueue unbound mask has been set as a subset of cpu_possible_mask.
> >
> > Make new rescuers use their associated workqueue unbound cpumask from
> > the start.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
>
> Apply 1-2 to wq/for-6.9.
Thank you!
Best,
Juri