On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:01 AM Kuan-Wei Chiu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Add min_heap_sift_up() to sift up the element at index 'idx' in the
> heap.
Normally sift up is used to implement the min heap but isn't part of
the API, eg. there is a sift up in min_heap_push. Should min_heapify
be renamed to min_heap_sift_down to align with this name?
Thanks,
Ian
> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/min_heap.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/min_heap.h b/include/linux/min_heap.h
> index ce085137fce7..586965977104 100644
> --- a/include/linux/min_heap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/min_heap.h
> @@ -199,6 +199,26 @@ bool __min_heap_push(struct __min_heap *heap, const void *element, size_t elem_s
> #define min_heap_push(_heap, _element, _func, _args) \
> __min_heap_push(&(_heap)->heap, _element, __minheap_obj_size(_heap), _func, _args)
>
> +/* Sift up ith element from the heap, O(log2(nr)). */
> +static __always_inline
> +void __min_heap_sift_up(struct __min_heap *heap, size_t elem_size, size_t idx,
> + const struct min_heap_callbacks *func, void *args)
> +{
> + void *data = heap->data;
> + size_t parent;
> +
> + while (idx) {
> + parent = (idx - 1) / 2;
> + if (func->less(data + parent * elem_size, data + idx * elem_size, args))
> + break;
> + func->swp(data + parent * elem_size, data + idx * elem_size, args);
> + idx = parent;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +#define min_heap_sift_up(_heap, _idx, _func, _args) \
> + __min_heap_sift_up(&(_heap)->heap, __minheap_obj_size(_heap), _idx, _func, _args)
> +
> /* Remove ith element from the heap, O(log2(nr)). */
> static __always_inline
> bool __min_heap_del(struct __min_heap *heap, size_t elem_size, size_t idx,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:12:18PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:01 AM Kuan-Wei Chiu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Add min_heap_sift_up() to sift up the element at index 'idx' in the
> > heap.
>
> Normally sift up is used to implement the min heap but isn't part of
> the API, eg. there is a sift up in min_heap_push. Should min_heapify
> be renamed to min_heap_sift_down to align with this name?
>
Sure, I can add a patch in v2 to rename min_heapify to min_heap_sift_down.
Regards,
Kuan-Wei
>
> > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > include/linux/min_heap.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/min_heap.h b/include/linux/min_heap.h
> > index ce085137fce7..586965977104 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/min_heap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/min_heap.h
> > @@ -199,6 +199,26 @@ bool __min_heap_push(struct __min_heap *heap, const void *element, size_t elem_s
> > #define min_heap_push(_heap, _element, _func, _args) \
> > __min_heap_push(&(_heap)->heap, _element, __minheap_obj_size(_heap), _func, _args)
> >
> > +/* Sift up ith element from the heap, O(log2(nr)). */
> > +static __always_inline
> > +void __min_heap_sift_up(struct __min_heap *heap, size_t elem_size, size_t idx,
> > + const struct min_heap_callbacks *func, void *args)
> > +{
> > + void *data = heap->data;
> > + size_t parent;
> > +
> > + while (idx) {
> > + parent = (idx - 1) / 2;
> > + if (func->less(data + parent * elem_size, data + idx * elem_size, args))
> > + break;
> > + func->swp(data + parent * elem_size, data + idx * elem_size, args);
> > + idx = parent;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define min_heap_sift_up(_heap, _idx, _func, _args) \
> > + __min_heap_sift_up(&(_heap)->heap, __minheap_obj_size(_heap), _idx, _func, _args)
> > +
> > /* Remove ith element from the heap, O(log2(nr)). */
> > static __always_inline
> > bool __min_heap_del(struct __min_heap *heap, size_t elem_size, size_t idx,
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >