On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 13:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> A couple of ad-hoc cleanups. No functional changes intended.
But it seems that since v3 my "Reviewed-by"s have disappeared. Is that
intentional, should I look through it again?
P.
>
> v4:
> - rebased on top of the latest vanilla (v6.9-rcX)
>
> v3:
> - rebased on top of driver-core-testing (Philipp)
> - added tags (Philipp)
>
> v2:
> - fixed plural vs. singular "to have" (Philipp)
>
> Andy Shevchenko (2):
> devres: Switch to use dev_err_probe() for unification
> devres: Don't use "proxy" headers
>
> lib/devres.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:53:22PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 13:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > A couple of ad-hoc cleanups. No functional changes intended.
>
> But it seems that since v3 my "Reviewed-by"s have disappeared. Is that
> intentional, should I look through it again?
Oops, it's utterly unintentional, sorry. I haven't done any changes.
It is basically a repetition of v2 (i.e. based on your code).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 14:03 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:53:22PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 13:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > A couple of ad-hoc cleanups. No functional changes intended.
> >
> > But it seems that since v3 my "Reviewed-by"s have disappeared. Is
> > that
> > intentional, should I look through it again?
>
> Oops, it's utterly unintentional, sorry. I haven't done any changes.
> It is basically a repetition of v2 (i.e. based on your code).
>
Alright, no problem – feel free to re-apply it
Reviewed-by: Philipp Stanner <[email protected]>