From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
syzbot reported a data-race in data-race in netlink_recvmsg() [1]
Indeed, netlink_recvmsg() can be run concurrently,
and netlink_dump() also needs protection.
[1]
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in netlink_recvmsg / netlink_recvmsg
read to 0xffff888141840b38 of 8 bytes by task 23057 on cpu 0:
netlink_recvmsg+0xea/0x730 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1988
sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1017 [inline]
sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:1038 [inline]
__sys_recvfrom+0x1ee/0x2e0 net/socket.c:2194
__do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2212 [inline]
__se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2208 [inline]
__x64_sys_recvfrom+0x78/0x90 net/socket.c:2208
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
write to 0xffff888141840b38 of 8 bytes by task 23037 on cpu 1:
netlink_recvmsg+0x114/0x730 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1989
sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1017 [inline]
sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:1038 [inline]
____sys_recvmsg+0x156/0x310 net/socket.c:2720
___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2762 [inline]
do_recvmmsg+0x2e5/0x710 net/socket.c:2856
__sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2935 [inline]
__do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2958 [inline]
__se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2951 [inline]
__x64_sys_recvmmsg+0xe2/0x160 net/socket.c:2951
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
value changed: 0x0000000000000000 -> 0x0000000000001000
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 1 PID: 23037 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc4-syzkaller-00195-g5a57b48fdfcb #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/02/2023
Fixes: 9063e21fb026 ("netlink: autosize skb lengthes")
Reported-by: syzbot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yenchia.chen <[email protected]>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 82df02695bbd..56ba8a6396ca 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ static int netlink_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
int noblock = flags & MSG_DONTWAIT;
- size_t copied;
+ size_t copied, max_recvmsg_len;
struct sk_buff *skb, *data_skb;
int err, ret;
@@ -1968,9 +1968,10 @@ static int netlink_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
#endif
/* Record the max length of recvmsg() calls for future allocations */
- nlk->max_recvmsg_len = max(nlk->max_recvmsg_len, len);
- nlk->max_recvmsg_len = min_t(size_t, nlk->max_recvmsg_len,
- SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(32768));
+ max_recvmsg_len = max(READ_ONCE(nlk->max_recvmsg_len), len);
+ max_recvmsg_len = min_t(size_t, max_recvmsg_len,
+ SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(32768));
+ WRITE_ONCE(nlk->max_recvmsg_len, max_recvmsg_len);
copied = data_skb->len;
if (len < copied) {
@@ -2219,6 +2220,7 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk)
struct netlink_ext_ack extack = {};
struct netlink_callback *cb;
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
+ size_t max_recvmsg_len;
struct module *module;
int err = -ENOBUFS;
int alloc_min_size;
@@ -2241,8 +2243,9 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk)
cb = &nlk->cb;
alloc_min_size = max_t(int, cb->min_dump_alloc, NLMSG_GOODSIZE);
- if (alloc_min_size < nlk->max_recvmsg_len) {
- alloc_size = nlk->max_recvmsg_len;
+ max_recvmsg_len = READ_ONCE(nlk->max_recvmsg_len);
+ if (alloc_min_size < max_recvmsg_len) {
+ alloc_size = max_recvmsg_len;
skb = alloc_skb(alloc_size,
(GFP_KERNEL & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) |
__GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY);
--
2.18.0
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 03:36:37PM +0800, Yenchia Chen wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
>
> syzbot reported a data-race in data-race in netlink_recvmsg() [1]
>
> Indeed, netlink_recvmsg() can be run concurrently,
> and netlink_dump() also needs protection.
>
> [1]
> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in netlink_recvmsg / netlink_recvmsg
>
> read to 0xffff888141840b38 of 8 bytes by task 23057 on cpu 0:
> netlink_recvmsg+0xea/0x730 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1988
> sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1017 [inline]
> sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:1038 [inline]
> __sys_recvfrom+0x1ee/0x2e0 net/socket.c:2194
> __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2212 [inline]
> __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2208 [inline]
> __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x78/0x90 net/socket.c:2208
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> write to 0xffff888141840b38 of 8 bytes by task 23037 on cpu 1:
> netlink_recvmsg+0x114/0x730 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1989
> sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1017 [inline]
> sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:1038 [inline]
> ____sys_recvmsg+0x156/0x310 net/socket.c:2720
> ___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2762 [inline]
> do_recvmmsg+0x2e5/0x710 net/socket.c:2856
> __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2935 [inline]
> __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2958 [inline]
> __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2951 [inline]
> __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0xe2/0x160 net/socket.c:2951
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> value changed: 0x0000000000000000 -> 0x0000000000001000
>
> Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
> CPU: 1 PID: 23037 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc4-syzkaller-00195-g5a57b48fdfcb #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/02/2023
>
> Fixes: 9063e21fb026 ("netlink: autosize skb lengthes")
> Reported-by: syzbot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: yenchia.chen <[email protected]>
> ---
The conflict resolution looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Carlos Llamas <[email protected]>