On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:11:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> SSP stands for Serial Synchronous Protocol and has nothing to do with
> UART, also known as USART, where 'A' stands for Asynchronous.
>
> Move the SSP bindings to where it belongs.
It's a serial device which is also used for other applications (the
other one upstream being audio) so I can see where the current binding
comes from and it's not super obvious that spi is especially better
here.
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 06:24:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:11:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > SSP stands for Serial Synchronous Protocol and has nothing to do with
> > UART, also known as USART, where 'A' stands for Asynchronous.
> >
> > Move the SSP bindings to where it belongs.
>
> It's a serial device which is also used for other applications (the
> other one upstream being audio) so I can see where the current binding
> comes from and it's not super obvious that spi is especially better
> here.
Hmm... okay. Then it's question to DT people. Consider this as a report.
Because UART (aka serial) is definitely not the place for SPI/SSP bindings
either.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko