On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:39:48AM +0000, Haifeng Xu wrote:
> In our production environment, we found many hung tasks which are
> blocked for more than 18 hours. Their call traces are like this:
>
> [346278.191038] __schedule+0x2d8/0x890
> [346278.191046] schedule+0x4e/0xb0
> [346278.191049] perf_event_free_task+0x220/0x270
> [346278.191056] ? init_wait_var_entry+0x50/0x50
> [346278.191060] copy_process+0x663/0x18d0
> [346278.191068] kernel_clone+0x9d/0x3d0
> [346278.191072] __do_sys_clone+0x5d/0x80
> [346278.191076] __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30
> [346278.191079] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0
> [346278.191083] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x50
> [346278.191086] ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0xc0
> [346278.191088] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x9/0x20
> [346278.191092] ? irqentry_exit+0x19/0x30
> [346278.191095] ? exc_page_fault+0x89/0x160
> [346278.191097] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
> [346278.191102] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> The task was waiting for the refcount become to 1, but from the vmcore,
> we found the refcount has already been 1. It seems that the task didn't
> get woken up by perf_event_release_kernel() and got stuck forever. The
> below scenario may cause the problem.
>
> Thread A Thread B
> ... ...
> perf_event_free_task perf_event_release_kernel
> ...
> acquire event->child_mutex
> ...
> get_ctx
> ... release event->child_mutex
> acquire ctx->mutex
> ...
> perf_free_event (acquire/release event->child_mutex)
> ...
> release ctx->mutex
> wait_var_event
> acquire ctx->mutex
> acquire event->child_mutex
> # move existing events to free_list
> release event->child_mutex
> release ctx->mutex
> put_ctx
> ... ...
>
> In this case, all events of the ctx have been freed, so we couldn't
> find the ctx in free_list and Thread A will miss the wakeup. It's thus
> necessary to add a wakeup after dropping the reference.
>
> Fixes: 1cf8dfe8a661 ("perf/core: Fix race between close() and fork()")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Haifeng Xu <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Thanks!, I'll hang onto this until after the merge window and then stick
it in tip/perf/urgent or somesuch.
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Thanks!, I'll hang onto this until after the merge window and then stick
> it in tip/perf/urgent or somesuch.
Just to check -- I couldn't spot this in tip/perf/urgent just now; are
you still happy to pick this up?
Mark.