This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 6.9.2-rc1
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
block: add a partscan sysfs attribute for disks
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
block: add a disk_has_partscan helper
SeongJae Park <[email protected]>
Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: fix wrong schemes effective quota update command
SeongJae Park <[email protected]>
Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: fix wrong example of DAMOS filter matching sysfs file
Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]>
docs: kernel_include.py: Cope with docutils 0.21
Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]>
admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling: fix return type of PR_SCHED_CORE_GET
Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
KEYS: trusted: Do not use WARN when encode fails
Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
Revert "media: v4l2-ctrls: show all owned controls in log_status"
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
remoteproc: mediatek: Make sure IPI buffer fits in L2TCM
Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
serial: kgdboc: Fix NMI-safety problems from keyboard reset code
Javier Carrasco <[email protected]>
usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x
Javier Carrasco <[email protected]>
usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps25750
Heikki Krogerus <[email protected]>
usb: typec: ucsi: displayport: Fix potential deadlock
Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <[email protected]>
net: usb: ax88179_178a: fix link status when link is set to down/up
Prashanth K <[email protected]>
usb: dwc3: Wait unconditionally after issuing EndXfer command
Carlos Llamas <[email protected]>
binder: fix max_thread type inconsistency
Bard Liao <[email protected]>
ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw: use generic rtd_init function for Realtek SDW DMICs
Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
KEYS: trusted: Fix memory leak in tpm2_key_encode()
Sungwoo Kim <[email protected]>
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix div-by-zero in l2cap_le_flowctl_init()
Uros Bizjak <[email protected]>
x86/percpu: Use __force to cast from __percpu address space
Ronald Wahl <[email protected]>
net: ks8851: Fix another TX stall caused by wrong ISR flag handling
Jose Fernandez <[email protected]>
drm/amd/display: Fix division by zero in setup_dsc_config
Perry Yuan <[email protected]>
cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the highest frequency issue which limits performance
Ben Greear <[email protected]>
wifi: iwlwifi: Use request_module_nowait
Peter Tsao <[email protected]>
Bluetooth: btusb: Fix the patch for MT7920 the affected to MT7921
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block | 10 +++
.../admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling.rst | 4 +-
Documentation/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage.rst | 6 +-
Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py | 1 -
Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h | 6 +-
block/genhd.c | 15 +++--
block/partitions/core.c | 5 +-
drivers/android/binder.c | 2 +-
drivers/android/binder_internal.h | 2 +-
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 22 ++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c | 7 +-
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls-core.c | 18 ++----
drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_common.c | 18 +-----
drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c | 37 +++++++----
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c | 10 +--
drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 10 ++-
drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c | 30 ++++++++-
drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 4 +-
drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 51 ++++++++++-----
drivers/usb/typec/tipd/tps6598x.h | 11 ++++
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/displayport.c | 4 --
include/linux/blkdev.h | 13 ++++
include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 9 +++
include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 1 +
net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 75 +++++++++++++++-------
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 31 +++++----
net/bluetooth/iso.c | 2 +-
net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 17 +----
net/bluetooth/sco.c | 6 +-
security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 25 ++++++--
sound/soc/intel/boards/Makefile | 1 +
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c | 12 ++--
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_common.h | 1 +
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_rt_dmic.c | 52 +++++++++++++++
36 files changed, 357 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Hello,
On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:45 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 6a8a28e45f4b ("Linux 6.9.2-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_schemes_tried_regions_hang.py
ok 13 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_schemes_tried_regions_wss_estimation.py
ok 14 selftests: damon: damos_quota.py
ok 15 selftests: damon: damos_apply_interval.py
ok 16 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 17 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
Hi Greg
*no* regressions here on x86_64 (RKL, Intel 11th Gen. CPU)
Thanks
Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <[email protected]>
On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully compiled and installed the kernel on my computer (Acer
Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On 5/23/24 6:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <[email protected]>
On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 15:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 126 total, 126 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On 5/23/24 07:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:45 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.9:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.9.2-rc1-g6a8a28e45f4b
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>
Jon
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
We are now testing 6.9 too, and it seems okay
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.9.y
We are seeing some problems with spectre-meltdown checker,
https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/1138103#L998
while it passes on v6.8.11-rc1:
https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/1137807#L976
I'm not sure if that signifies real problem.
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[2024-05-23 15:12] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, 6.9.2-rc1 is running fine on various x86_64 bare metal and virtual
machines of mine (Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake).
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <[email protected]>
Regards
Pascal
[2024-05-23 15:12] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, 6.9.2-rc1 is running fine on various x86_64 bare metal and virtual
machines of mine (Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake).
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <[email protected]>
Regards
Pascal
[2024-05-23 15:12] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, 6.8.7-rc1 is running fine on various x86_64 bare metal and virtual
machines of mine (Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake).
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <[email protected]>
Regards
Pascal
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Thanks.