2017-06-26 10:08:28

by Dou Liyang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] Unify interrupt mode and setup it as soon as possible

Hi Thomas,

At 05/23/2017 04:23 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Dou,
>
> On Wed, 10 May 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
>
>> According to Ingo's and Eric's advice[1,2], Try my best to optimize the
>> init of interrupt delivery mode for x86.
>
> sorry for replying late. The patchset is not forgotten, it's on my todo
> list and I'll tend to it latest next week.


I hope to know the status of this patchest in your todo list.

If you haven't dealt with it yet, I want to resent it as V5 first for
you:

* rebase this patchset to upstream
* remove the RFC presix
* remove the 1/12 patch
* replace the pr_info with apic_printk

Look forward to your reply !

Thanks,
Dou.



2017-06-26 11:50:55

by Thomas Gleixner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] Unify interrupt mode and setup it as soon as possible

Dou,

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
> I hope to know the status of this patchest in your todo list.

I still did not come around to it.

> If you haven't dealt with it yet, I want to resent it as V5 first for
> you:
>
> * rebase this patchset to upstream
> * remove the RFC presix
> * remove the 1/12 patch
> * replace the pr_info with apic_printk

That would be appreciated. It's going to move on top of my list, but not
before mid of next week.

Thanks,

tglx

2017-06-27 01:50:22

by Dou Liyang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] Unify interrupt mode and setup it as soon as possible

Hi Thomas,

At 06/26/2017 07:50 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Dou,
>
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> I hope to know the status of this patchest in your todo list.
>
> I still did not come around to it.
>
>> If you haven't dealt with it yet, I want to resent it as V5 first for
>> you:
>>
>> * rebase this patchset to upstream
>> * remove the RFC presix
>> * remove the 1/12 patch
>> * replace the pr_info with apic_printk
>
> That would be appreciated. It's going to move on top of my list, but not
> before mid of next week.
>

Oh, Thank you for your prompt reply.

I know now.

Thanks,

Liyang.