On 08/08/2022 13:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Emails to Dan Murphy bounce ("550 Invalid recipient <[email protected]>
> (#5.1.1)").
(...)
> description: |
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml
> index 4883527ab5c7..509a0667b04e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> title: TI BQ25980 Flash Charger
>
> maintainers:
> - - Dan Murphy <[email protected]>
> - Ricardo Rivera-Matos <[email protected]>
Ricardo's also bounces... Does it mean TI is not interested in
maintaining mainline support for its drivers?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 8/8/22 6:08 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/08/2022 13:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Emails to Dan Murphy bounce ("550 Invalid recipient <[email protected]>
>> (#5.1.1)").
>
>
> (...)
>
>> description: |
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml
>> index 4883527ab5c7..509a0667b04e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml
>> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> title: TI BQ25980 Flash Charger
>>
>> maintainers:
>> - - Dan Murphy <[email protected]>
>> - Ricardo Rivera-Matos <[email protected]>
>
> Ricardo's also bounces... Does it mean TI is not interested in
> maintaining mainline support for its drivers?
>
TI is still interested in maintaining support here. But as we know folks
come and go, so giving specific emails might not be the best option.
Doesn't look like the schema here allows free-form strings, but if it did
I'd recommend the TI E2E Power-Management support forum[0] added. Any
questions on Linux/DT for these parts posted there would land on my desk
just the same, or to whomever is assigned in the future with maintaining
these drivers.
Either way, I have several of these parts and can support these. Feel free
to replace Dan's email with my email if that works better.
Andrew
[0] https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> Either way, I have several of these parts and can support these. Feel free
> to replace Dan's email with my email if that works better.
Please could you submit a patch to MAINTAINERS replacing Dan's name
with your. I see lots of bounces from PHY driver patches because the
get_maintainers script returns his address.
Thanks
Andrew
On 08/08/2022 18:04, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 8/8/22 6:08 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/08/2022 13:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Emails to Dan Murphy bounce ("550 Invalid recipient <[email protected]>
>>> (#5.1.1)").
>>
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> description: |
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml
>>> index 4883527ab5c7..509a0667b04e 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq25980.yaml
>>> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> title: TI BQ25980 Flash Charger
>>>
>>> maintainers:
>>> - - Dan Murphy <[email protected]>
>>> - Ricardo Rivera-Matos <[email protected]>
>>
>> Ricardo's also bounces... Does it mean TI is not interested in
>> maintaining mainline support for its drivers?
>>
>
> TI is still interested in maintaining support here. But as we know folks
> come and go, so giving specific emails might not be the best option.
> Doesn't look like the schema here allows free-form strings, but if it did
> I'd recommend the TI E2E Power-Management support forum[0] added. Any
> questions on Linux/DT for these parts posted there would land on my desk
> just the same, or to whomever is assigned in the future with maintaining
> these drivers.
Currently an email address is required. I am not sure if there is
intention to change it, because similarly to MAINTAINERS file email is
the way of our communication. Also in MAINTAINERS we expect to have
person's address (with M:) and for the lists there is a separate entry.
> Either way, I have several of these parts and can support these. Feel free
> to replace Dan's email with my email if that works better.
Yes, that would be great, thanks!
Best regards,
Krzysztof