If some bits were cleared by i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave() in
i2c_dw_isr_slave() and not handled immediately, those cleared bits would
not be shown again by later i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(). They
therefore were forgotten to be handled.
i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave() should be called once in an ISR and take
its returned state for all later handlings.
Signed-off-by: Michael Wu <[email protected]>
---
Change in v3:
- revert deleted braces of 'else' branch in v2
Change in v2:
- revert moving I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED reporting in v1
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c
index 44974b53a626..13de01a0f75f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c
@@ -159,7 +159,6 @@ static int i2c_dw_irq_handler_slave(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
u32 raw_stat, stat, enabled, tmp;
u8 val = 0, slave_activity;
- regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_INTR_STAT, &stat);
regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_ENABLE, &enabled);
regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_RAW_INTR_STAT, &raw_stat);
regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_STATUS, &tmp);
@@ -168,6 +167,7 @@ static int i2c_dw_irq_handler_slave(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
if (!enabled || !(raw_stat & ~DW_IC_INTR_ACTIVITY) || !dev->slave)
return 0;
+ stat = i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(dev);
dev_dbg(dev->dev,
"%#x STATUS SLAVE_ACTIVITY=%#x : RAW_INTR_STAT=%#x : INTR_STAT=%#x\n",
enabled, slave_activity, raw_stat, stat);
@@ -188,11 +188,9 @@ static int i2c_dw_irq_handler_slave(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
val);
}
regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_CLR_RD_REQ, &tmp);
- stat = i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(dev);
} else {
regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_CLR_RD_REQ, &tmp);
regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_CLR_RX_UNDER, &tmp);
- stat = i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(dev);
}
if (!i2c_slave_event(dev->slave,
I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED,
@@ -207,7 +205,6 @@ static int i2c_dw_irq_handler_slave(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
regmap_read(dev->map, DW_IC_CLR_RX_DONE, &tmp);
i2c_slave_event(dev->slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, &val);
- stat = i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(dev);
return 1;
}
@@ -219,7 +216,6 @@ static int i2c_dw_irq_handler_slave(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
dev_vdbg(dev->dev, "Byte %X acked!", val);
} else {
i2c_slave_event(dev->slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, &val);
- stat = i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(dev);
}
return 1;
@@ -230,7 +226,6 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_dw_isr_slave(int this_irq, void *dev_id)
struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = dev_id;
int ret;
- i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(dev);
ret = i2c_dw_irq_handler_slave(dev);
if (ret > 0)
complete(&dev->cmd_complete);
--
2.17.1
On 10/23/20 8:40 AM, Michael Wu wrote:
> If some bits were cleared by i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave() in
> i2c_dw_isr_slave() and not handled immediately, those cleared bits would
> not be shown again by later i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(). They
> therefore were forgotten to be handled.
>
> i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave() should be called once in an ISR and take
> its returned state for all later handlings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wu <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Change in v3:
> - revert deleted braces of 'else' branch in v2
>
> Change in v2:
> - revert moving I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED reporting in v1
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <[email protected]>
Hi,
> On 10/23/20 8:40 AM, Michael Wu wrote:
> > If some bits were cleared by i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave() in
> > i2c_dw_isr_slave() and not handled immediately, those cleared bits would
> > not be shown again by later i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(). They
> > therefore were forgotten to be handled.
> >
> > i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave() should be called once in an ISR and take
> > its returned state for all later handlings.
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c | 7 +------
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <[email protected]>
There is another logic issue about the I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED reporting.
May I give patches based on this commit?
Michael Wu