From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:40:12 +0100
* Add jump targets so that a call of the function "mutex_unlock" is stored
less often in these function implementations.
* Replace eight calls by goto statements.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
---
drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
index af53a1084ee5..4adf38b6d939 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
@@ -765,19 +765,18 @@ static int kxcjk1013_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
ret = -EBUSY;
else {
ret = kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, true);
- if (ret < 0) {
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto unlock;
+
ret = kxcjk1013_get_acc_reg(data, chan->scan_index);
if (ret < 0) {
kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, false);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return ret;
+ goto unlock;
}
*val = sign_extend32(ret >> 4, 11);
ret = kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, false);
}
+unlock:
mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -905,8 +904,8 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
if (!state && data->motion_trigger_on) {
data->ev_enable_state = 0;
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+ goto unlock;
}
/*
@@ -919,23 +918,20 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
* is always on so sequence doesn't matter
*/
ret = kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, state);
- if (ret < 0) {
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto unlock;
ret = kxcjk1013_setup_any_motion_interrupt(data, state);
if (ret < 0) {
kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, false);
data->ev_enable_state = 0;
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return ret;
+ goto unlock;
}
data->ev_enable_state = state;
+unlock:
mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
-
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static int kxcjk1013_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
@@ -1086,32 +1082,30 @@ static int kxcjk1013_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
if (!state && data->ev_enable_state && data->motion_trigger_on) {
data->motion_trigger_on = false;
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+ goto unlock;
}
ret = kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, state);
- if (ret < 0) {
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto unlock;
+
if (data->motion_trig == trig)
ret = kxcjk1013_setup_any_motion_interrupt(data, state);
else
ret = kxcjk1013_setup_new_data_interrupt(data, state);
if (ret < 0) {
kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, false);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return ret;
+ goto unlock;
}
if (data->motion_trig == trig)
data->motion_trigger_on = state;
else
data->dready_trigger_on = state;
+unlock:
mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
-
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static const struct iio_trigger_ops kxcjk1013_trigger_ops = {
--
2.16.2
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:47:20 +0100
SF Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:40:12 +0100
>
> * Add jump targets so that a call of the function "mutex_unlock" is stored
> less often in these function implementations.
>
> * Replace eight calls by goto statements.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
A few minor comments inline, but at first glance at least these look
to be fine in principle.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> index af53a1084ee5..4adf38b6d939 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
> @@ -765,19 +765,18 @@ static int kxcjk1013_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> ret = -EBUSY;
> else {
> ret = kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, true);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> ret = kxcjk1013_get_acc_reg(data, chan->scan_index);
> if (ret < 0) {
> kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, false);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> - return ret;
> + goto unlock;
> }
> *val = sign_extend32(ret >> 4, 11);
> ret = kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, false);
> }
> +unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
>
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -905,8 +904,8 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> if (!state && data->motion_trigger_on) {
> data->ev_enable_state = 0;
> - mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> - return 0;
> + ret = 0;
do this where it is orginally defined rather than here.
int ret = 0;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -919,23 +918,20 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> * is always on so sequence doesn't matter
> */
> ret = kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, state);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto unlock;
>
> ret = kxcjk1013_setup_any_motion_interrupt(data, state);
> if (ret < 0) {
> kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, false);
> data->ev_enable_state = 0;
> - mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> - return ret;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> data->ev_enable_state = state;
> +unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> -
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int kxcjk1013_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> @@ -1086,32 +1082,30 @@ static int kxcjk1013_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
>
> if (!state && data->ev_enable_state && data->motion_trigger_on) {
> data->motion_trigger_on = false;
> - mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> - return 0;
> + ret = 0;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> ret = kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, state);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> if (data->motion_trig == trig)
> ret = kxcjk1013_setup_any_motion_interrupt(data, state);
> else
> ret = kxcjk1013_setup_new_data_interrupt(data, state);
> if (ret < 0) {
> kxcjk1013_set_power_state(data, false);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> - return ret;
> + goto unlock;
> }
> if (data->motion_trig == trig)
> data->motion_trigger_on = state;
> else
> data->dready_trigger_on = state;
>
> +unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> -
Please leave the blank line. It makes it slightly easier for the eye
to pick up on the return.
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static const struct iio_trigger_ops kxcjk1013_trigger_ops = {