2019-07-23 20:07:22

by Marc Zyngier

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] irqchip/gic-v3: Add ESPI range support

Add the required support for the ESPI range, which behave exactly like
the SPIs of old, only with new funky INTIDs.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 17 +++++-
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 2371e0a70215..d328a8de533f 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -51,13 +51,16 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
u32 nr_redist_regions;
u64 flags;
bool has_rss;
- unsigned int irq_nr;
struct partition_desc *ppi_descs[16];
};

static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly;
static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);

+#define GIC_ID_NR (1U << GICD_TYPER_ID_BITS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer))
+#define GIC_LINE_NR GICD_TYPER_SPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
+#define GIC_ESPI_NR GICD_TYPER_ESPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
+
/*
* The behaviours of RPR and PMR registers differ depending on the value of
* SCR_EL3.FIQ, and the behaviour of non-secure priority registers of the
@@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, has_rss);
enum gic_intid_range {
PPI_RANGE,
SPI_RANGE,
+ ESPI_RANGE,
LPI_RANGE,
__INVALID_RANGE__
};
@@ -111,6 +115,8 @@ static enum gic_intid_range __get_intid_range(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
return PPI_RANGE;
case 32 ... 1019:
return SPI_RANGE;
+ case ESPI_BASE_INTID ... 8191:
+ return ESPI_RANGE;
case 8192 ... GENMASK(23, 0):
return LPI_RANGE;
default:
@@ -141,6 +147,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(struct irq_data *d)
return gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();

case SPI_RANGE:
+ case ESPI_RANGE:
/* SPI -> dist_base */
return gic_data.dist_base;

@@ -234,6 +241,31 @@ static u32 convert_offset_index(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset, u32 *index)
case SPI_RANGE:
*index = d->hwirq;
return offset;
+ case ESPI_RANGE:
+ *index = d->hwirq - ESPI_BASE_INTID;
+ switch (offset) {
+ case GICD_ISENABLER:
+ return GICD_ISENABLERnE;
+ case GICD_ICENABLER:
+ return GICD_ICENABLERnE;
+ case GICD_ISPENDR:
+ return GICD_ISPENDRnE;
+ case GICD_ICPENDR:
+ return GICD_ICPENDRnE;
+ case GICD_ISACTIVER:
+ return GICD_ISACTIVERnE;
+ case GICD_ICACTIVER:
+ return GICD_ICACTIVERnE;
+ case GICD_IPRIORITYR:
+ return GICD_IPRIORITYRnE;
+ case GICD_ICFGR:
+ return GICD_ICFGRnE;
+ case GICD_IROUTER:
+ return GICD_IROUTERnE;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -316,7 +348,7 @@ static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
{
u32 reg;

- if (d->hwirq >= gic_data.irq_nr) /* PPI/SPI only */
+ if (d->hwirq >= 8192) /* PPI/SPI only */
return -EINVAL;

switch (which) {
@@ -343,7 +375,7 @@ static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
static int gic_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool *val)
{
- if (d->hwirq >= gic_data.irq_nr) /* PPI/SPI only */
+ if (d->hwirq >= 8192) /* PPI/SPI only */
return -EINVAL;

switch (which) {
@@ -567,7 +599,12 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
gic_arch_enable_irqs();
}

- if (likely(irqnr > 15 && irqnr < 1020) || irqnr >= 8192) {
+ /* Check for special IDs first */
+ if ((irqnr >= 1020 && irqnr <= 1023))
+ return;
+
+ /* Treat anything but SGIs in a uniform way */
+ if (likely(irqnr > 15)) {
int err;

if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key))
@@ -655,10 +692,26 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(void)
* do the right thing if the kernel is running in secure mode,
* but that's not the intended use case anyway.
*/
- for (i = 32; i < gic_data.irq_nr; i += 32)
+ for (i = 32; i < GIC_LINE_NR; i += 32)
writel_relaxed(~0, base + GICD_IGROUPR + i / 8);

- gic_dist_config(base, gic_data.irq_nr, gic_dist_wait_for_rwp);
+ /* Extended SPI range, not handled by the GICv2/GICv3 common code */
+ for (i = 0; i < GIC_ESPI_NR; i += 32) {
+ writel_relaxed(~0U, base + GICD_ICENABLERnE + i / 8);
+ writel_relaxed(~0U, base + GICD_ICACTIVERnE + i / 8);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < GIC_ESPI_NR; i += 32)
+ writel_relaxed(~0U, base + GICD_IGROUPRnE + i / 8);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < GIC_ESPI_NR; i += 16)
+ writel_relaxed(0, base + GICD_ICFGRnE + i / 4);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < GIC_ESPI_NR; i += 4)
+ writel_relaxed(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI_X4, base + GICD_IPRIORITYRnE + i);
+
+ /* Now do the common stuff, and wait for the distributor to drain */
+ gic_dist_config(base, GIC_LINE_NR, gic_dist_wait_for_rwp);

/* Enable distributor with ARE, Group1 */
writel_relaxed(GICD_CTLR_ARE_NS | GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1A | GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1,
@@ -669,8 +722,11 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(void)
* enabled.
*/
affinity = gic_mpidr_to_affinity(cpu_logical_map(smp_processor_id()));
- for (i = 32; i < gic_data.irq_nr; i++)
+ for (i = 32; i < GIC_LINE_NR; i++)
gic_write_irouter(affinity, base + GICD_IROUTER + i * 8);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < GIC_ESPI_NR; i++)
+ gic_write_irouter(affinity, base + GICD_IROUTERnE + i * 8);
}

static int gic_iterate_rdists(int (*fn)(struct redist_region *, void __iomem *))
@@ -1130,8 +1186,6 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_eoimode1_chip = {
IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND,
};

-#define GIC_ID_NR (1U << GICD_TYPER_ID_BITS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer))
-
static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_hw_number_t hw)
{
@@ -1149,6 +1203,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
break;

case SPI_RANGE:
+ case ESPI_RANGE:
irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hw, chip, d->host_data,
handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL);
irq_set_probe(irq);
@@ -1188,6 +1243,9 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
case GIC_IRQ_TYPE_PARTITION:
*hwirq = fwspec->param[1] + 16;
break;
+ case 2: /* ESPI */
+ *hwirq = fwspec->param[1] + ESPI_BASE_INTID;
+ break;
case GIC_IRQ_TYPE_LPI: /* LPI */
*hwirq = fwspec->param[1];
break;
@@ -1342,7 +1400,6 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
struct fwnode_handle *handle)
{
u32 typer;
- int gic_irqs;
int err;

if (!is_hyp_mode_available())
@@ -1359,15 +1416,11 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,

/*
* Find out how many interrupts are supported.
- * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources (SGI+PPI+SPI)
*/
typer = readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_TYPER);
gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer = typer;
- gic_irqs = GICD_TYPER_IRQS(typer);
- if (gic_irqs > 1020)
- gic_irqs = 1020;
- gic_data.irq_nr = gic_irqs;
-
+ pr_info("%d SPIs implemented\n", GIC_LINE_NR - 32);
+ pr_info("%d Extended SPIs implemented\n", GIC_ESPI_NR);
gic_data.domain = irq_domain_create_tree(handle, &gic_irq_domain_ops,
&gic_data);
irq_domain_update_bus_token(gic_data.domain, DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED);
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
index 67c4b9806d43..c523bf1faa55 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
@@ -30,10 +30,22 @@
#define GICD_ICFGR 0x0C00
#define GICD_IGRPMODR 0x0D00
#define GICD_NSACR 0x0E00
+#define GICD_IGROUPRnE 0x1000
+#define GICD_ISENABLERnE 0x1200
+#define GICD_ICENABLERnE 0x1400
+#define GICD_ISPENDRnE 0x1600
+#define GICD_ICPENDRnE 0x1800
+#define GICD_ISACTIVERnE 0x1A00
+#define GICD_ICACTIVERnE 0x1C00
+#define GICD_IPRIORITYRnE 0x2000
+#define GICD_ICFGRnE 0x3000
#define GICD_IROUTER 0x6000
+#define GICD_IROUTERnE 0x8000
#define GICD_IDREGS 0xFFD0
#define GICD_PIDR2 0xFFE8

+#define ESPI_BASE_INTID 4096
+
/*
* Those registers are actually from GICv2, but the spec demands that they
* are implemented as RES0 if ARE is 1 (which we do in KVM's emulated GICv3).
@@ -69,10 +81,13 @@
#define GICD_TYPER_RSS (1U << 26)
#define GICD_TYPER_LPIS (1U << 17)
#define GICD_TYPER_MBIS (1U << 16)
+#define GICD_TYPER_ESPI (1U << 8)

#define GICD_TYPER_ID_BITS(typer) ((((typer) >> 19) & 0x1f) + 1)
#define GICD_TYPER_NUM_LPIS(typer) ((((typer) >> 11) & 0x1f) + 1)
-#define GICD_TYPER_IRQS(typer) ((((typer) & 0x1f) + 1) * 32)
+#define GICD_TYPER_SPIS(typer) ((((typer) & 0x1f) + 1) * 32)
+#define GICD_TYPER_ESPIS(typer) \
+ (((typer) & GICD_TYPER_ESPI) ? GICD_TYPER_SPIS((typer) >> 27) : 0)

#define GICD_IROUTER_SPI_MODE_ONE (0U << 31)
#define GICD_IROUTER_SPI_MODE_ANY (1U << 31)
--
2.20.1


2019-07-23 23:15:05

by Lokesh Vutla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] irqchip/gic-v3: Add ESPI range support



On 23/07/19 4:14 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Add the required support for the ESPI range, which behave exactly like
> the SPIs of old, only with new funky INTIDs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 17 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index 2371e0a70215..d328a8de533f 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -51,13 +51,16 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
> u32 nr_redist_regions;
> u64 flags;
> bool has_rss;
> - unsigned int irq_nr;
> struct partition_desc *ppi_descs[16];
> };
>
> static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly;
> static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
>
> +#define GIC_ID_NR (1U << GICD_TYPER_ID_BITS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer))
> +#define GIC_LINE_NR GICD_TYPER_SPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
> +#define GIC_ESPI_NR GICD_TYPER_ESPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
> +
> /*
> * The behaviours of RPR and PMR registers differ depending on the value of
> * SCR_EL3.FIQ, and the behaviour of non-secure priority registers of the
> @@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, has_rss);
> enum gic_intid_range {
> PPI_RANGE,
> SPI_RANGE,
> + ESPI_RANGE,
> LPI_RANGE,
> __INVALID_RANGE__
> };
> @@ -111,6 +115,8 @@ static enum gic_intid_range __get_intid_range(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> return PPI_RANGE;
> case 32 ... 1019:
> return SPI_RANGE;
> + case ESPI_BASE_INTID ... 8191:

as per dt documentation, shouldn't the range be
case ESPI_BASE_INTID ... 5119:

> + return ESPI_RANGE;
> case 8192 ... GENMASK(23, 0):
> return LPI_RANGE;
> default:
> @@ -141,6 +147,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(struct irq_data *d)
> return gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
>
> case SPI_RANGE:
> + case ESPI_RANGE:
> /* SPI -> dist_base */
> return gic_data.dist_base;
>
> @@ -234,6 +241,31 @@ static u32 convert_offset_index(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset, u32 *index)
> case SPI_RANGE:
> *index = d->hwirq;
> return offset;
> + case ESPI_RANGE:
> + *index = d->hwirq - ESPI_BASE_INTID;
> + switch (offset) {
> + case GICD_ISENABLER:
> + return GICD_ISENABLERnE;
> + case GICD_ICENABLER:
> + return GICD_ICENABLERnE;
> + case GICD_ISPENDR:
> + return GICD_ISPENDRnE;
> + case GICD_ICPENDR:
> + return GICD_ICPENDRnE;
> + case GICD_ISACTIVER:
> + return GICD_ISACTIVERnE;
> + case GICD_ICACTIVER:
> + return GICD_ICACTIVERnE;
> + case GICD_IPRIORITYR:
> + return GICD_IPRIORITYRnE;
> + case GICD_ICFGR:
> + return GICD_ICFGRnE;
> + case GICD_IROUTER:
> + return GICD_IROUTERnE;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -316,7 +348,7 @@ static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> {
> u32 reg;
>
> - if (d->hwirq >= gic_data.irq_nr) /* PPI/SPI only */
> + if (d->hwirq >= 8192) /* PPI/SPI only */
> return -EINVAL;
>
> switch (which) {
> @@ -343,7 +375,7 @@ static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> static int gic_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool *val)
> {
> - if (d->hwirq >= gic_data.irq_nr) /* PPI/SPI only */
> + if (d->hwirq >= 8192) /* PPI/SPI only */
> return -EINVAL;
>
> switch (which) {
> @@ -567,7 +599,12 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
> gic_arch_enable_irqs();
> }
>
> - if (likely(irqnr > 15 && irqnr < 1020) || irqnr >= 8192) {
> + /* Check for special IDs first */
> + if ((irqnr >= 1020 && irqnr <= 1023))
> + return;

May be I am missing something here, what is special about these 4 interrupts? or
you meant to check for reserved range here?

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh


2019-07-24 02:15:45

by Marc Zyngier

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] irqchip/gic-v3: Add ESPI range support

On 23/07/2019 13:50, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>
>
> On 23/07/19 4:14 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Add the required support for the ESPI range, which behave exactly like
>> the SPIs of old, only with new funky INTIDs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 17 +++++-
>> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
>> index 2371e0a70215..d328a8de533f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
>> @@ -51,13 +51,16 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
>> u32 nr_redist_regions;
>> u64 flags;
>> bool has_rss;
>> - unsigned int irq_nr;
>> struct partition_desc *ppi_descs[16];
>> };
>>
>> static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly;
>> static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
>>
>> +#define GIC_ID_NR (1U << GICD_TYPER_ID_BITS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer))
>> +#define GIC_LINE_NR GICD_TYPER_SPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
>> +#define GIC_ESPI_NR GICD_TYPER_ESPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
>> +
>> /*
>> * The behaviours of RPR and PMR registers differ depending on the value of
>> * SCR_EL3.FIQ, and the behaviour of non-secure priority registers of the
>> @@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, has_rss);
>> enum gic_intid_range {
>> PPI_RANGE,
>> SPI_RANGE,
>> + ESPI_RANGE,
>> LPI_RANGE,
>> __INVALID_RANGE__
>> };
>> @@ -111,6 +115,8 @@ static enum gic_intid_range __get_intid_range(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
>> return PPI_RANGE;
>> case 32 ... 1019:
>> return SPI_RANGE;
>> + case ESPI_BASE_INTID ... 8191:
>
> as per dt documentation, shouldn't the range be
> case ESPI_BASE_INTID ... 5119:

Yes, you're right. Although I strongly suspect that someone will bump
this limit up again at some point (there is enough space in the new
register space for 4k interrupts -- madness).

>
>> + return ESPI_RANGE;
>> case 8192 ... GENMASK(23, 0):
>> return LPI_RANGE;
>> default:
>> @@ -141,6 +147,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(struct irq_data *d)
>> return gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
>>
>> case SPI_RANGE:
>> + case ESPI_RANGE:
>> /* SPI -> dist_base */
>> return gic_data.dist_base;
>>
>> @@ -234,6 +241,31 @@ static u32 convert_offset_index(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset, u32 *index)
>> case SPI_RANGE:
>> *index = d->hwirq;
>> return offset;
>> + case ESPI_RANGE:
>> + *index = d->hwirq - ESPI_BASE_INTID;
>> + switch (offset) {
>> + case GICD_ISENABLER:
>> + return GICD_ISENABLERnE;
>> + case GICD_ICENABLER:
>> + return GICD_ICENABLERnE;
>> + case GICD_ISPENDR:
>> + return GICD_ISPENDRnE;
>> + case GICD_ICPENDR:
>> + return GICD_ICPENDRnE;
>> + case GICD_ISACTIVER:
>> + return GICD_ISACTIVERnE;
>> + case GICD_ICACTIVER:
>> + return GICD_ICACTIVERnE;
>> + case GICD_IPRIORITYR:
>> + return GICD_IPRIORITYRnE;
>> + case GICD_ICFGR:
>> + return GICD_ICFGRnE;
>> + case GICD_IROUTER:
>> + return GICD_IROUTERnE;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + break;
>> default:
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -316,7 +348,7 @@ static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
>> {
>> u32 reg;
>>
>> - if (d->hwirq >= gic_data.irq_nr) /* PPI/SPI only */
>> + if (d->hwirq >= 8192) /* PPI/SPI only */
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> switch (which) {
>> @@ -343,7 +375,7 @@ static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
>> static int gic_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
>> enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool *val)
>> {
>> - if (d->hwirq >= gic_data.irq_nr) /* PPI/SPI only */
>> + if (d->hwirq >= 8192) /* PPI/SPI only */
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> switch (which) {
>> @@ -567,7 +599,12 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
>> gic_arch_enable_irqs();
>> }
>>
>> - if (likely(irqnr > 15 && irqnr < 1020) || irqnr >= 8192) {
>> + /* Check for special IDs first */
>> + if ((irqnr >= 1020 && irqnr <= 1023))
>> + return;
>
> May be I am missing something here, what is special about these 4 interrupts? or
> you meant to check for reserved range here?

What's so special about the special INTID range is that these are not
interrupts at all. That's how the GIC signals that *something else* is
happening (see 2.2.1 "Special INTIDs" in the architecture spec). In
practice, and as long as you run Linux in non-secure mode, only 1023 can
happen.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...