2024-03-07 10:16:10

by Dragos Tatulea

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net] net: esp: fix bad handling of pages from page_pool

When the skb is reorganized during esp_output (!esp->inline), the pages
coming from the original skb fragments are supposed to be released back
to the system through put_page. But if the skb fragment pages are
originating from a page_pool, calling put_page on them will trigger a
page_pool leak which will eventually result in a crash.

This leak can be easily observed when using CONFIG_DEBUG_VM and doing
ipsec + gre (non offloaded) forwarding:

BUG: Bad page state in process ksoftirqd/16 pfn:1451b6
page:00000000de2b8d32 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1451b6000 pfn:0x1451b6
flags: 0x200000000000000(node=0|zone=2)
page_type: 0xffffffff()
raw: 0200000000000000 dead000000000040 ffff88810d23c000 0000000000000000
raw: 00000001451b6000 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: page_pool leak
Modules linked in: ip_gre gre mlx5_ib mlx5_core xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink iptable_nat nf_nat xt_addrtype br_netfilter rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm ib_uverbs ib_core overlay zram zsmalloc fuse [last unloaded: mlx5_core]
CPU: 16 PID: 96 Comm: ksoftirqd/16 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4+ #22
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x36/0x50
bad_page+0x70/0xf0
free_unref_page_prepare+0x27a/0x460
free_unref_page+0x38/0x120
esp_ssg_unref.isra.0+0x15f/0x200
esp_output_tail+0x66d/0x780
esp_xmit+0x2c5/0x360
validate_xmit_xfrm+0x313/0x370
? validate_xmit_skb+0x1d/0x330
validate_xmit_skb_list+0x4c/0x70
sch_direct_xmit+0x23e/0x350
__dev_queue_xmit+0x337/0xba0
? nf_hook_slow+0x3f/0xd0
ip_finish_output2+0x25e/0x580
iptunnel_xmit+0x19b/0x240
ip_tunnel_xmit+0x5fb/0xb60
ipgre_xmit+0x14d/0x280 [ip_gre]
dev_hard_start_xmit+0xc3/0x1c0
__dev_queue_xmit+0x208/0xba0
? nf_hook_slow+0x3f/0xd0
ip_finish_output2+0x1ca/0x580
ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x32/0x40
ip_sublist_rcv+0x1b2/0x1f0
? ip_rcv_finish_core.constprop.0+0x460/0x460
ip_list_rcv+0x103/0x130
__netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x181/0x1e0
netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1b3/0x2c0
napi_gro_receive+0xc8/0x200
gro_cell_poll+0x52/0x90
__napi_poll+0x25/0x1a0
net_rx_action+0x28e/0x300
__do_softirq+0xc3/0x276
? sort_range+0x20/0x20
run_ksoftirqd+0x1e/0x30
smpboot_thread_fn+0xa6/0x130
kthread+0xcd/0x100
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
</TASK>

The suggested fix is to introduce a new wrapper (skb_page_unref) that
covers page refcounting for page_pool pages as well.

Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Anatoli N.Chechelnickiy <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Anatoli N.Chechelnickiy <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Ian Kumlien <[email protected]>
Closes: https: //lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAA85sZvvHtrpTQRqdaOx6gd55zPAVsqMYk_Lwh4Md5knTq7AyA@mail.gmail.com
Cc: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <[email protected]>
Change-Id: I3d2744e1abb33a694a8f49e07f913724a0f8871a
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 10 ++++++++++
net/ipv4/esp4.c | 8 ++++----
net/ipv6/esp6.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index 696e7680656f..6126fc8e4a89 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -3452,6 +3452,16 @@ int skb_cow_data_for_xdp(struct page_pool *pool, struct sk_buff **pskb,
struct bpf_prog *prog);
bool napi_pp_put_page(struct page *page, bool napi_safe);

+static inline void
+skb_page_unref(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct page *page, bool napi_safe)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL
+ if (skb->pp_recycle && napi_pp_put_page(page, napi_safe))
+ return;
+#endif
+ put_page(page);
+}
+
static inline void
napi_frag_unref(skb_frag_t *frag, bool recycle, bool napi_safe)
{
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index 4dd9e5040672..d33d12421814 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static inline struct scatterlist *esp_req_sg(struct crypto_aead *aead,
__alignof__(struct scatterlist));
}

-static void esp_ssg_unref(struct xfrm_state *x, void *tmp)
+static void esp_ssg_unref(struct xfrm_state *x, void *tmp, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct crypto_aead *aead = x->data;
int extralen = 0;
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void esp_ssg_unref(struct xfrm_state *x, void *tmp)
*/
if (req->src != req->dst)
for (sg = sg_next(req->src); sg; sg = sg_next(sg))
- put_page(sg_page(sg));
+ skb_page_unref(skb, sg_page(sg), false);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_INET_ESPINTCP
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void esp_output_done(void *data, int err)
}

tmp = ESP_SKB_CB(skb)->tmp;
- esp_ssg_unref(x, tmp);
+ esp_ssg_unref(x, tmp, skb);
kfree(tmp);

if (xo && (xo->flags & XFRM_DEV_RESUME)) {
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ int esp_output_tail(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info *
}

if (sg != dsg)
- esp_ssg_unref(x, tmp);
+ esp_ssg_unref(x, tmp, skb);

if (!err && x->encap && x->encap->encap_type == TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP)
err = esp_output_tail_tcp(x, skb);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/esp6.c b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
index 6e6efe026cdc..7371886d4f9f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/esp6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static inline struct scatterlist *esp_req_sg(struct crypto_aead *aead,
__alignof__(struct scatterlist));
}

-static void esp_ssg_unref(struct xfrm_state *x, void *tmp)
+static void esp_ssg_unref(struct xfrm_state *x, void *tmp, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct crypto_aead *aead = x->data;
int extralen = 0;
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void esp_ssg_unref(struct xfrm_state *x, void *tmp)
*/
if (req->src != req->dst)
for (sg = sg_next(req->src); sg; sg = sg_next(sg))
- put_page(sg_page(sg));
+ skb_page_unref(skb, sg_page(sg), false);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_INET6_ESPINTCP
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void esp_output_done(void *data, int err)
}

tmp = ESP_SKB_CB(skb)->tmp;
- esp_ssg_unref(x, tmp);
+ esp_ssg_unref(x, tmp, skb);
kfree(tmp);

esp_output_encap_csum(skb);
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ int esp6_output_tail(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, struct esp_info
}

if (sg != dsg)
- esp_ssg_unref(x, tmp);
+ esp_ssg_unref(x, tmp, skb);

if (!err && x->encap && x->encap->encap_type == TCP_ENCAP_ESPINTCP)
err = esp_output_tail_tcp(x, skb);
--
2.42.0



2024-03-07 18:02:05

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: esp: fix bad handling of pages from page_pool

LGTM, thanks! Minor nit picks for the tags, otherise:

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:15:47 +0200 Dragos Tatulea wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <[email protected]>

General guidance is to order tag chronologically, so:

Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: (speaking of which, you need to add it, presumably point it at
the commit where skb->pp_recycle was added)
Reported-by:
Link / Closes:
your sign-off
Review tags

> Reported-by: Anatoli N.Chechelnickiy <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Anatoli N.Chechelnickiy <[email protected]>

You can combine it as Reported-and-tested-by:
up to you

> Reported-by: Ian Kumlien <[email protected]>
> Closes: https: //lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAA85sZvvHtrpTQRqdaOx6gd55zPAVsqMYk_Lwh4Md5knTq7AyA@mail.gmail.com

A space sneaked into the link.

> Cc: [email protected]
> Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <[email protected]>
> Change-Id: I3d2744e1abb33a694a8f49e07f913724a0f8871a

Change-Id's gotta go.
--
pw-bot: cr

2024-03-07 18:42:53

by Dragos Tatulea

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: esp: fix bad handling of pages from page_pool

On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 09:51 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> LGTM, thanks! Minor nit picks for the tags, otherise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
>
Thanks!

> On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:15:47 +0200 Dragos Tatulea wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <[email protected]>
>
> General guidance is to order tag chronologically, so:
>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Fixes: (speaking of which, you need to add it, presumably point it at
> the commit where skb->pp_recycle was added)
> Reported-by:
> Link / Closes:
> your sign-off
> Review tags
>
> > Reported-by: Anatoli N.Chechelnickiy <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: Anatoli N.Chechelnickiy <[email protected]>
>
> You can combine it as Reported-and-tested-by:
> up to you
>
> > Reported-by: Ian Kumlien <[email protected]>
> > Closes: https: //lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAA85sZvvHtrpTQRqdaOx6gd55zPAVsqMYk_Lwh4Md5knTq7AyA@mail.gmail.com
>
> A space sneaked into the link.
>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <[email protected]>
> > Change-Id: I3d2744e1abb33a694a8f49e07f913724a0f8871a
>
> Change-Id's gotta go.
Fixed tags in v2. Thanks for explaining the tag order. It was never really clear
to me.

Thanks,
Dragos