2007-05-11 19:53:59

by Simon Arlott

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] spelling fixes: init/

Spelling fix in init/.

Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
---
init/main.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index e8d080c..7ee2031 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int __init unknown_bootoption(char *param, char *val)
return 0;

/*
- * Preemptive maintenance for "why didn't my mispelled command
+ * Preemptive maintenance for "why didn't my misspelled command
* line work?"
*/
if (strchr(param, '.') && (!val || strchr(param, '.') < val)) {
--
1.5.0.1

--
Simon Arlott


2007-05-12 03:05:08

by Satyam Sharma

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spelling fixes: init/

On 5/12/07, Simon Arlott <[email protected]> wrote:
> Spelling fix in init/.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
> ---
> init/main.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index e8d080c..7ee2031 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int __init unknown_bootoption(char *param, char *val)
> return 0;
>
> /*
> - * Preemptive maintenance for "why didn't my mispelled command
> + * Preemptive maintenance for "why didn't my misspelled command
> * line work?"

That was probably intentional.