When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
error occurs, otherwise we may access data above the currently allocated
memory.
Propagate the error code returned by 'rmi_spi_manage_pools()' instead.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
---
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c
index 76edbf2c1bce..082defc329a8 100644
--- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c
@@ -147,8 +147,11 @@ static int rmi_spi_xfer(struct rmi_spi_xport *rmi_spi,
if (len > RMI_SPI_XFER_SIZE_LIMIT)
return -EINVAL;
- if (rmi_spi->xfer_buf_size < len)
- rmi_spi_manage_pools(rmi_spi, len);
+ if (rmi_spi->xfer_buf_size < len) {
+ ret = rmi_spi_manage_pools(rmi_spi, len);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
if (addr == 0)
/*
--
2.14.1
On 04/02/2018 07:03 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
> error occurs, otherwise we may access data above the currently allocated
> memory.
>
> Propagate the error code returned by 'rmi_spi_manage_pools()' instead.
Yep, that definitely looks like an oversight on my part. Thanks for the fix.
Andrew
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Duggan <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c
> index 76edbf2c1bce..082defc329a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c
> @@ -147,8 +147,11 @@ static int rmi_spi_xfer(struct rmi_spi_xport *rmi_spi,
> if (len > RMI_SPI_XFER_SIZE_LIMIT)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (rmi_spi->xfer_buf_size < len)
> - rmi_spi_manage_pools(rmi_spi, len);
> + if (rmi_spi->xfer_buf_size < len) {
> + ret = rmi_spi_manage_pools(rmi_spi, len);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> if (addr == 0)
> /*
Hi Christophe JAILLET.
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 7.5278)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126,
v4.15.15: Build OK!
v4.14.32: Build OK!
v4.9.92: Build OK!
v4.4.126: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
8d99758dee31: ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add SPI transport driver")
ff8f83708b3e: ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add support for 2D sensors and F11")
fdf51604f104: ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add I2C transport driver")
2b6a321da9a2: ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add support for Synaptics RMI4 devices")
2b6a321da9a2: ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add support for Synaptics RMI4 devices")
fdf51604f104: ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add I2C transport driver")
2b6a321da9a2: ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add support for Synaptics RMI4 devices")
2b6a321da9a2: ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add support for Synaptics RMI4 devices")
Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.
--
Thanks.
Sasha
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 05:52:52PM -0700, Andrew Duggan wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2018 07:03 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
> > error occurs, otherwise we may access data above the currently allocated
> > memory.
> >
> > Propagate the error code returned by 'rmi_spi_manage_pools()' instead.
> Yep, that definitely looks like an oversight on my part. Thanks for the fix.
>
> Andrew
>
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Duggan <[email protected]>
Applied, thank you.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c
> > index 76edbf2c1bce..082defc329a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c
> > @@ -147,8 +147,11 @@ static int rmi_spi_xfer(struct rmi_spi_xport *rmi_spi,
> > if (len > RMI_SPI_XFER_SIZE_LIMIT)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - if (rmi_spi->xfer_buf_size < len)
> > - rmi_spi_manage_pools(rmi_spi, len);
> > + if (rmi_spi->xfer_buf_size < len) {
> > + ret = rmi_spi_manage_pools(rmi_spi, len);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > if (addr == 0)
> > /*
>
--
Dmitry