2019-09-05 23:06:40

by Vivek Goyal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 15/18] virtiofs: Make virtio_fs object refcounted

This object is used both by fuse_connection as well virt device. So make
this object reference counted and that makes it easy to define life cycle
of the object.

Now deivce can be removed while filesystem is still mounted. This will
cleanup all the virtqueues but virtio_fs object will still be around and
will be cleaned when filesystem is unmounted and sb/fc drops its reference.

Removing a device also stops all virt queues and any new reuqest gets
error -ENOTCONN. All existing in flight requests are drained before
->remove returns.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
---
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index 01bbf2c0e144..29ec2f5bbbe2 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {

/* A virtio-fs device instance */
struct virtio_fs {
+ struct kref refcount;
struct list_head list; /* on virtio_fs_instances */
char *tag;
struct virtio_fs_vq *vqs;
@@ -63,6 +64,27 @@ static inline struct fuse_pqueue *vq_to_fpq(struct virtqueue *vq)
return &vq_to_fsvq(vq)->fud->pq;
}

+static void release_virtiofs_obj(struct kref *ref)
+{
+ struct virtio_fs *vfs = container_of(ref, struct virtio_fs, refcount);
+
+ kfree(vfs->vqs);
+ kfree(vfs);
+}
+
+static void virtiofs_put(struct virtio_fs *fs)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+ kref_put(&fs->refcount, release_virtiofs_obj);
+ mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+}
+
+static void virtio_fs_put(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq)
+{
+ struct virtio_fs *vfs = fiq->priv;
+ virtiofs_put(vfs);
+}
+
static void virtio_fs_drain_queue(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq)
{
WARN_ON(fsvq->in_flight < 0);
@@ -156,8 +178,10 @@ static struct virtio_fs *virtio_fs_find_instance(const char *tag)
mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);

list_for_each_entry(fs, &virtio_fs_instances, list) {
- if (strcmp(fs->tag, tag) == 0)
+ if (strcmp(fs->tag, tag) == 0) {
+ kref_get(&fs->refcount);
goto found;
+ }
}

fs = NULL; /* not found */
@@ -519,6 +543,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
fs = kzalloc(sizeof(*fs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!fs)
return -ENOMEM;
+ kref_init(&fs->refcount);
vdev->priv = fs;

ret = virtio_fs_read_tag(vdev, fs);
@@ -570,18 +595,18 @@ static void virtio_fs_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{
struct virtio_fs *fs = vdev->priv;

+ mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+ list_del_init(&fs->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+
virtio_fs_stop_all_queues(fs);
virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(fs);
vdev->config->reset(vdev);
virtio_fs_cleanup_vqs(vdev, fs);

- mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
- list_del(&fs->list);
- mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
-
vdev->priv = NULL;
- kfree(fs->vqs);
- kfree(fs);
+ /* Put device reference on virtio_fs object */
+ virtiofs_put(fs);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
@@ -932,6 +957,7 @@ const static struct fuse_iqueue_ops virtio_fs_fiq_ops = {
.wake_forget_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_forget_and_unlock,
.wake_interrupt_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_interrupt_and_unlock,
.wake_pending_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_pending_and_unlock,
+ .put = virtio_fs_put,
};

static int virtio_fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb)
@@ -1026,7 +1052,9 @@ static void virtio_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
fuse_kill_sb_anon(sb);

/* fuse_kill_sb_anon() must have sent destroy. Stop all queues
- * and drain one more time and free fuse devices.
+ * and drain one more time and free fuse devices. Freeing fuse
+ * devices will drop their reference on fuse_conn and that in
+ * turn will drop its reference on virtio_fs object.
*/
virtio_fs_stop_all_queues(vfs);
virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(vfs);
@@ -1060,6 +1088,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_context *fsc)
struct fuse_conn *fc;
int err;

+ /* This gets a reference on virtio_fs object. This ptr gets installed
+ * in fc->iq->priv. Once fuse_conn is going away, it calls ->put()
+ * to drop the reference to this object.
+ */
fs = virtio_fs_find_instance(fsc->source);
if (!fs) {
pr_info("virtio-fs: tag <%s> not found\n", fsc->source);
@@ -1067,8 +1099,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_context *fsc)
}

fc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_conn), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!fc)
+ if (!fc) {
+ virtiofs_put(fs);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }

fuse_conn_init(fc, get_user_ns(current_user_ns()), &virtio_fs_fiq_ops,
fs);
--
2.20.1


2019-09-06 17:48:27

by Stefan Hajnoczi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] virtiofs: Make virtio_fs object refcounted

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 03:48:56PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> This object is used both by fuse_connection as well virt device. So make
> this object reference counted and that makes it easy to define life cycle
> of the object.
>
> Now deivce can be removed while filesystem is still mounted. This will
> cleanup all the virtqueues but virtio_fs object will still be around and
> will be cleaned when filesystem is unmounted and sb/fc drops its reference.
>
> Removing a device also stops all virt queues and any new reuqest gets
> error -ENOTCONN. All existing in flight requests are drained before
> ->remove returns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> index 01bbf2c0e144..29ec2f5bbbe2 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {
>
> /* A virtio-fs device instance */
> struct virtio_fs {
> + struct kref refcount;
> struct list_head list; /* on virtio_fs_instances */
> char *tag;
> struct virtio_fs_vq *vqs;
> @@ -63,6 +64,27 @@ static inline struct fuse_pqueue *vq_to_fpq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> return &vq_to_fsvq(vq)->fud->pq;
> }
>
> +static void release_virtiofs_obj(struct kref *ref)
> +{
> + struct virtio_fs *vfs = container_of(ref, struct virtio_fs, refcount);
> +
> + kfree(vfs->vqs);
> + kfree(vfs);
> +}
> +
> +static void virtiofs_put(struct virtio_fs *fs)

Why do the two function names above contain "virtiofs" instead
of "virtio_fs"? I'm not sure if this is intentional and is supposed to
mean something, but it's confusing.

> +{
> + mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> + kref_put(&fs->refcount, release_virtiofs_obj);
> + mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_fs_put(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq)

Minor issue: this function name is confusingly similar to
virtiofs_put(). Please rename to virtio_fs_fiq_put().


Attachments:
(No filename) (2.05 kB)
signature.asc (499.00 B)
Download all attachments

2019-09-06 18:56:05

by Vivek Goyal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] virtiofs: Make virtio_fs object refcounted

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:03:09PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 03:48:56PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > This object is used both by fuse_connection as well virt device. So make
> > this object reference counted and that makes it easy to define life cycle
> > of the object.
> >
> > Now deivce can be removed while filesystem is still mounted. This will
> > cleanup all the virtqueues but virtio_fs object will still be around and
> > will be cleaned when filesystem is unmounted and sb/fc drops its reference.
> >
> > Removing a device also stops all virt queues and any new reuqest gets
> > error -ENOTCONN. All existing in flight requests are drained before
> > ->remove returns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > index 01bbf2c0e144..29ec2f5bbbe2 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {
> >
> > /* A virtio-fs device instance */
> > struct virtio_fs {
> > + struct kref refcount;
> > struct list_head list; /* on virtio_fs_instances */
> > char *tag;
> > struct virtio_fs_vq *vqs;
> > @@ -63,6 +64,27 @@ static inline struct fuse_pqueue *vq_to_fpq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > return &vq_to_fsvq(vq)->fud->pq;
> > }
> >
> > +static void release_virtiofs_obj(struct kref *ref)
> > +{
> > + struct virtio_fs *vfs = container_of(ref, struct virtio_fs, refcount);
> > +
> > + kfree(vfs->vqs);
> > + kfree(vfs);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void virtiofs_put(struct virtio_fs *fs)
>
> Why do the two function names above contain "virtiofs" instead
> of "virtio_fs"? I'm not sure if this is intentional and is supposed to
> mean something, but it's confusing.
>
> > +{
> > + mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> > + kref_put(&fs->refcount, release_virtiofs_obj);
> > + mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void virtio_fs_put(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq)
>
> Minor issue: this function name is confusingly similar to
> virtiofs_put(). Please rename to virtio_fs_fiq_put().

Fixed with ->release semantics. Replaced "virtiofs" with "virtio_fs".


Subject: virtiofs: Make virtio_fs object refcounted

This object is used both by fuse_connection as well virt device. So make
this object reference counted and that makes it easy to define life cycle
of the object.

Now deivce can be removed while filesystem is still mounted. This will
cleanup all the virtqueues but virtio_fs object will still be around and
will be cleaned when filesystem is unmounted and sb/fc drops its reference.

Removing a device also stops all virt queues and any new reuqest gets
error -ENOTCONN. All existing in flight requests are drained before
->remove returns.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
---
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Index: rhvgoyal-linux-fuse/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
===================================================================
--- rhvgoyal-linux-fuse.orig/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c 2019-09-06 09:24:21.177245246 -0400
+++ rhvgoyal-linux-fuse/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c 2019-09-06 09:40:53.309245246 -0400
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {

/* A virtio-fs device instance */
struct virtio_fs {
+ struct kref refcount;
struct list_head list; /* on virtio_fs_instances */
char *tag;
struct virtio_fs_vq *vqs;
@@ -63,6 +64,27 @@ static inline struct fuse_pqueue *vq_to_
return &vq_to_fsvq(vq)->fud->pq;
}

+static void release_virtio_fs_obj(struct kref *ref)
+{
+ struct virtio_fs *vfs = container_of(ref, struct virtio_fs, refcount);
+
+ kfree(vfs->vqs);
+ kfree(vfs);
+}
+
+static void virtio_fs_put(struct virtio_fs *fs)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+ kref_put(&fs->refcount, release_virtio_fs_obj);
+ mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+}
+
+static void virtio_fs_fiq_release(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq)
+{
+ struct virtio_fs *vfs = fiq->priv;
+ virtio_fs_put(vfs);
+}
+
static void virtio_fs_drain_queue(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq)
{
WARN_ON(fsvq->in_flight < 0);
@@ -156,8 +178,10 @@ static struct virtio_fs *virtio_fs_find_
mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);

list_for_each_entry(fs, &virtio_fs_instances, list) {
- if (strcmp(fs->tag, tag) == 0)
+ if (strcmp(fs->tag, tag) == 0) {
+ kref_get(&fs->refcount);
goto found;
+ }
}

fs = NULL; /* not found */
@@ -519,6 +543,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_probe(struct virtio
fs = kzalloc(sizeof(*fs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!fs)
return -ENOMEM;
+ kref_init(&fs->refcount);
vdev->priv = fs;

ret = virtio_fs_read_tag(vdev, fs);
@@ -570,18 +595,18 @@ static void virtio_fs_remove(struct virt
{
struct virtio_fs *fs = vdev->priv;

+ mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+ list_del_init(&fs->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+
virtio_fs_stop_all_queues(fs);
virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(fs);
vdev->config->reset(vdev);
virtio_fs_cleanup_vqs(vdev, fs);

- mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
- list_del(&fs->list);
- mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
-
vdev->priv = NULL;
- kfree(fs->vqs);
- kfree(fs);
+ /* Put device reference on virtio_fs object */
+ virtio_fs_put(fs);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
@@ -932,6 +957,7 @@ const static struct fuse_iqueue_ops virt
.wake_forget_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_forget_and_unlock,
.wake_interrupt_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_interrupt_and_unlock,
.wake_pending_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_pending_and_unlock,
+ .release = virtio_fs_fiq_release,
};

static int virtio_fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb)
@@ -1026,7 +1052,9 @@ static void virtio_kill_sb(struct super_
fuse_kill_sb_anon(sb);

/* fuse_kill_sb_anon() must have sent destroy. Stop all queues
- * and drain one more time and free fuse devices.
+ * and drain one more time and free fuse devices. Freeing fuse
+ * devices will drop their reference on fuse_conn and that in
+ * turn will drop its reference on virtio_fs object.
*/
virtio_fs_stop_all_queues(vfs);
virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(vfs);
@@ -1060,6 +1088,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_
struct fuse_conn *fc;
int err;

+ /* This gets a reference on virtio_fs object. This ptr gets installed
+ * in fc->iq->priv. Once fuse_conn is going away, it calls ->put()
+ * to drop the reference to this object.
+ */
fs = virtio_fs_find_instance(fsc->source);
if (!fs) {
pr_info("virtio-fs: tag <%s> not found\n", fsc->source);
@@ -1067,8 +1099,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_
}

fc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_conn), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!fc)
+ if (!fc) {
+ virtio_fs_put(fs);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }

fuse_conn_init(fc, get_user_ns(current_user_ns()), &virtio_fs_fiq_ops,
fs);

2019-09-09 09:37:14

by piaojun

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 15/18] virtiofs: Make virtio_fs object refcounted



On 2019/9/6 3:48, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> This object is used both by fuse_connection as well virt device. So make
> this object reference counted and that makes it easy to define life cycle
> of the object.
>
> Now deivce can be removed while filesystem is still mounted. This will
> cleanup all the virtqueues but virtio_fs object will still be around and
> will be cleaned when filesystem is unmounted and sb/fc drops its reference.
>
> Removing a device also stops all virt queues and any new reuqest gets
> error -ENOTCONN. All existing in flight requests are drained before
> ->remove returns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> index 01bbf2c0e144..29ec2f5bbbe2 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {
>
> /* A virtio-fs device instance */
> struct virtio_fs {
> + struct kref refcount;
> struct list_head list; /* on virtio_fs_instances */
> char *tag;
> struct virtio_fs_vq *vqs;
> @@ -63,6 +64,27 @@ static inline struct fuse_pqueue *vq_to_fpq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> return &vq_to_fsvq(vq)->fud->pq;
> }
>
> +static void release_virtiofs_obj(struct kref *ref)
> +{
> + struct virtio_fs *vfs = container_of(ref, struct virtio_fs, refcount);
> +
> + kfree(vfs->vqs);
> + kfree(vfs);
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_fs_put(struct virtio_fs *fs)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> + kref_put(&fs->refcount, release_virtiofs_obj);
> + mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_fs_put(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq)
> +{
> + struct virtio_fs *vfs = fiq->priv;
> + virtiofs_put(vfs);
> +}

It's a little confusing that virtiofs_put() looks like virtiofs_put(),
and could we use __virtio_fs_put to replace virtio_fs_put?

Thanks,
Jun

2019-09-10 18:33:20

by Stefan Hajnoczi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] virtiofs: Make virtio_fs object refcounted

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:50:32AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:03:09PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 03:48:56PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > This object is used both by fuse_connection as well virt device. So make
> > > this object reference counted and that makes it easy to define life cycle
> > > of the object.
> > >
> > > Now deivce can be removed while filesystem is still mounted. This will
> > > cleanup all the virtqueues but virtio_fs object will still be around and
> > > will be cleaned when filesystem is unmounted and sb/fc drops its reference.
> > >
> > > Removing a device also stops all virt queues and any new reuqest gets
> > > error -ENOTCONN. All existing in flight requests are drained before
> > > ->remove returns.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > > index 01bbf2c0e144..29ec2f5bbbe2 100644
> > > --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > > +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {
> > >
> > > /* A virtio-fs device instance */
> > > struct virtio_fs {
> > > + struct kref refcount;
> > > struct list_head list; /* on virtio_fs_instances */
> > > char *tag;
> > > struct virtio_fs_vq *vqs;
> > > @@ -63,6 +64,27 @@ static inline struct fuse_pqueue *vq_to_fpq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > return &vq_to_fsvq(vq)->fud->pq;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void release_virtiofs_obj(struct kref *ref)
> > > +{
> > > + struct virtio_fs *vfs = container_of(ref, struct virtio_fs, refcount);
> > > +
> > > + kfree(vfs->vqs);
> > > + kfree(vfs);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void virtiofs_put(struct virtio_fs *fs)
> >
> > Why do the two function names above contain "virtiofs" instead
> > of "virtio_fs"? I'm not sure if this is intentional and is supposed to
> > mean something, but it's confusing.
> >
> > > +{
> > > + mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> > > + kref_put(&fs->refcount, release_virtiofs_obj);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void virtio_fs_put(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq)
> >
> > Minor issue: this function name is confusingly similar to
> > virtiofs_put(). Please rename to virtio_fs_fiq_put().
>
> Fixed with ->release semantics. Replaced "virtiofs" with "virtio_fs".
>
>
> Subject: virtiofs: Make virtio_fs object refcounted
>
> This object is used both by fuse_connection as well virt device. So make
> this object reference counted and that makes it easy to define life cycle
> of the object.
>
> Now deivce can be removed while filesystem is still mounted. This will
> cleanup all the virtqueues but virtio_fs object will still be around and
> will be cleaned when filesystem is unmounted and sb/fc drops its reference.
>
> Removing a device also stops all virt queues and any new reuqest gets
> error -ENOTCONN. All existing in flight requests are drained before
> ->remove returns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Index: rhvgoyal-linux-fuse/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> ===================================================================
> --- rhvgoyal-linux-fuse.orig/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c 2019-09-06 09:24:21.177245246 -0400
> +++ rhvgoyal-linux-fuse/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c 2019-09-06 09:40:53.309245246 -0400
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {
>
> /* A virtio-fs device instance */
> struct virtio_fs {
> + struct kref refcount;
> struct list_head list; /* on virtio_fs_instances */
> char *tag;
> struct virtio_fs_vq *vqs;
> @@ -63,6 +64,27 @@ static inline struct fuse_pqueue *vq_to_
> return &vq_to_fsvq(vq)->fud->pq;
> }
>
> +static void release_virtio_fs_obj(struct kref *ref)
> +{
> + struct virtio_fs *vfs = container_of(ref, struct virtio_fs, refcount);
> +
> + kfree(vfs->vqs);
> + kfree(vfs);
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_fs_put(struct virtio_fs *fs)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> + kref_put(&fs->refcount, release_virtio_fs_obj);
> + mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_fs_fiq_release(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq)
> +{
> + struct virtio_fs *vfs = fiq->priv;
> + virtio_fs_put(vfs);
> +}
> +
> static void virtio_fs_drain_queue(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq)
> {
> WARN_ON(fsvq->in_flight < 0);
> @@ -156,8 +178,10 @@ static struct virtio_fs *virtio_fs_find_
> mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
>
> list_for_each_entry(fs, &virtio_fs_instances, list) {
> - if (strcmp(fs->tag, tag) == 0)
> + if (strcmp(fs->tag, tag) == 0) {
> + kref_get(&fs->refcount);
> goto found;
> + }
> }
>
> fs = NULL; /* not found */
> @@ -519,6 +543,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_probe(struct virtio
> fs = kzalloc(sizeof(*fs), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!fs)
> return -ENOMEM;
> + kref_init(&fs->refcount);
> vdev->priv = fs;
>
> ret = virtio_fs_read_tag(vdev, fs);
> @@ -570,18 +595,18 @@ static void virtio_fs_remove(struct virt
> {
> struct virtio_fs *fs = vdev->priv;
>
> + mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> + list_del_init(&fs->list);
> + mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> +
> virtio_fs_stop_all_queues(fs);
> virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(fs);
> vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> virtio_fs_cleanup_vqs(vdev, fs);
>
> - mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> - list_del(&fs->list);
> - mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> -
> vdev->priv = NULL;
> - kfree(fs->vqs);
> - kfree(fs);
> + /* Put device reference on virtio_fs object */
> + virtio_fs_put(fs);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> @@ -932,6 +957,7 @@ const static struct fuse_iqueue_ops virt
> .wake_forget_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_forget_and_unlock,
> .wake_interrupt_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_interrupt_and_unlock,
> .wake_pending_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_pending_and_unlock,
> + .release = virtio_fs_fiq_release,
> };
>
> static int virtio_fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb)
> @@ -1026,7 +1052,9 @@ static void virtio_kill_sb(struct super_
> fuse_kill_sb_anon(sb);
>
> /* fuse_kill_sb_anon() must have sent destroy. Stop all queues
> - * and drain one more time and free fuse devices.
> + * and drain one more time and free fuse devices. Freeing fuse
> + * devices will drop their reference on fuse_conn and that in
> + * turn will drop its reference on virtio_fs object.
> */
> virtio_fs_stop_all_queues(vfs);
> virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(vfs);
> @@ -1060,6 +1088,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_
> struct fuse_conn *fc;
> int err;
>
> + /* This gets a reference on virtio_fs object. This ptr gets installed
> + * in fc->iq->priv. Once fuse_conn is going away, it calls ->put()
> + * to drop the reference to this object.
> + */
> fs = virtio_fs_find_instance(fsc->source);
> if (!fs) {
> pr_info("virtio-fs: tag <%s> not found\n", fsc->source);
> @@ -1067,8 +1099,10 @@ static int virtio_fs_get_tree(struct fs_
> }
>
> fc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_conn), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!fc)
> + if (!fc) {
> + virtio_fs_put(fs);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> fuse_conn_init(fc, get_user_ns(current_user_ns()), &virtio_fs_fiq_ops,
> fs);

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>


Attachments:
(No filename) (7.42 kB)
signature.asc (495.00 B)
Download all attachments

2019-09-10 18:33:59

by Vivek Goyal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 15/18] virtiofs: Make virtio_fs object refcounted

On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 07:10:03PM +0800, piaojun wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/9/6 3:48, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > This object is used both by fuse_connection as well virt device. So make
> > this object reference counted and that makes it easy to define life cycle
> > of the object.
> >
> > Now deivce can be removed while filesystem is still mounted. This will
> > cleanup all the virtqueues but virtio_fs object will still be around and
> > will be cleaned when filesystem is unmounted and sb/fc drops its reference.
> >
> > Removing a device also stops all virt queues and any new reuqest gets
> > error -ENOTCONN. All existing in flight requests are drained before
> > ->remove returns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > index 01bbf2c0e144..29ec2f5bbbe2 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {
> >
> > /* A virtio-fs device instance */
> > struct virtio_fs {
> > + struct kref refcount;
> > struct list_head list; /* on virtio_fs_instances */
> > char *tag;
> > struct virtio_fs_vq *vqs;
> > @@ -63,6 +64,27 @@ static inline struct fuse_pqueue *vq_to_fpq(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > return &vq_to_fsvq(vq)->fud->pq;
> > }
> >
> > +static void release_virtiofs_obj(struct kref *ref)
> > +{
> > + struct virtio_fs *vfs = container_of(ref, struct virtio_fs, refcount);
> > +
> > + kfree(vfs->vqs);
> > + kfree(vfs);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void virtio_fs_put(struct virtio_fs *fs)
> > +{
> > + mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> > + kref_put(&fs->refcount, release_virtiofs_obj);
> > + mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void virtio_fs_put(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq)
> > +{
> > + struct virtio_fs *vfs = fiq->priv;
> > + virtiofs_put(vfs);
> > +}
>
> It's a little confusing that virtiofs_put() looks like virtiofs_put(),
> and could we use __virtio_fs_put to replace virtio_fs_put?

Fixed this in follow up patch I posted.

https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2019-September/msg00091.html

Vivek