2021-10-13 14:34:49

by Pierre-Louis Bossart

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 04/13] ASoC: soc-pcm: introduce snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq/unlock_irq()

In preparation for more changes, add two new helpers to gradually
modify the DPCM locks.

Since DPCM functions are not used from interrupt handlers, we can only
use the lock_irq case.

While most of the uses of DPCM are internal to soc-pcm.c, some drivers
in soc/fsl and soc/sh do make use of DPCM-related loops that will
require protection, adding EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is needed for those
drivers.

The stream argument is unused in this patch but will be enabled in
follow-up patches.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]>
---
include/sound/soc-dpcm.h | 3 +++
sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
index 9c00118603e7..8ed40b8f3da8 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
@@ -151,4 +151,7 @@ bool dpcm_end_walk_at_be(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *widget, enum snd_soc_dapm_d
#define dpcm_be_dai_startup_unwind(fe, stream) dpcm_be_dai_stop(fe, stream, 0, NULL)
#define dpcm_be_dai_shutdown(fe, stream) dpcm_be_dai_stop(fe, stream, 1, NULL)

+void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream);
+void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream);
+
#endif
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index 19539300d94d..52851827d53f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -29,6 +29,18 @@

#define DPCM_MAX_BE_USERS 8

+void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
+{
+ spin_lock_irq(&fe->card->dpcm_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq);
+
+void snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
+{
+ spin_unlock_irq(&fe->card->dpcm_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq);
+
/* can this BE stop and free */
static int snd_soc_dpcm_can_be_free_stop(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be, int stream);
@@ -85,7 +97,6 @@ static ssize_t dpcm_show_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params = &fe->dpcm[stream].hw_params;
struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
ssize_t offset = 0;
- unsigned long flags;

/* FE state */
offset += scnprintf(buf + offset, size - offset,
@@ -113,7 +124,7 @@ static ssize_t dpcm_show_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
goto out;
}

- spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) {
struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be = dpcm->be;
params = &dpcm->hw_params;
@@ -134,7 +145,7 @@ static ssize_t dpcm_show_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
params_channels(params),
params_rate(params));
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);
out:
return offset;
}
@@ -1141,7 +1152,6 @@ static int dpcm_be_connect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be, int stream)
{
struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
- unsigned long flags;

/* only add new dpcms */
for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) {
@@ -1157,10 +1167,10 @@ static int dpcm_be_connect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
dpcm->fe = fe;
be->dpcm[stream].runtime = fe->dpcm[stream].runtime;
dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_NEW;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
list_add(&dpcm->list_be, &fe->dpcm[stream].be_clients);
list_add(&dpcm->list_fe, &be->dpcm[stream].fe_clients);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);

dev_dbg(fe->dev, "connected new DPCM %s path %s %s %s\n",
stream ? "capture" : "playback", fe->dai_link->name,
@@ -1203,7 +1213,6 @@ static void dpcm_be_reparent(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
void dpcm_be_disconnect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
{
struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm, *d;
- unsigned long flags;

for_each_dpcm_be_safe(fe, stream, dpcm, d) {
dev_dbg(fe->dev, "ASoC: BE %s disconnect check for %s\n",
@@ -1222,10 +1231,10 @@ void dpcm_be_disconnect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)

dpcm_remove_debugfs_state(dpcm);

- spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
list_del(&dpcm->list_be);
list_del(&dpcm->list_fe);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);
kfree(dpcm);
}
}
@@ -1451,12 +1460,11 @@ int dpcm_process_paths(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
void dpcm_clear_pending_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
{
struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
- unsigned long flags;

- spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm)
dpcm_set_be_update_state(dpcm->be, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);
}

void dpcm_be_dai_stop(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream,
@@ -2374,7 +2382,6 @@ static int dpcm_run_update_startup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
enum snd_soc_dpcm_trigger trigger = fe->dai_link->trigger[stream];
int ret = 0;
- unsigned long flags;

dev_dbg(fe->dev, "ASoC: runtime %s open on FE %s\n",
stream ? "capture" : "playback", fe->dai_link->name);
@@ -2443,7 +2450,7 @@ static int dpcm_run_update_startup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
dpcm_be_dai_shutdown(fe, stream);
disconnect:
/* disconnect any pending BEs */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) {
struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be = dpcm->be;

@@ -2455,7 +2462,7 @@ static int dpcm_run_update_startup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
be->dpcm[stream].state == SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_NEW)
dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_FREE;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);

if (ret < 0)
dev_err(fe->dev, "ASoC: %s() failed (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
@@ -2855,10 +2862,9 @@ static int snd_soc_dpcm_check_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
int state;
int ret = 1;
- unsigned long flags;
int i;

- spin_lock_irqsave(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq(fe, stream);
for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dpcm) {

if (dpcm->fe == fe)
@@ -2872,7 +2878,7 @@ static int snd_soc_dpcm_check_state(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
}
}
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fe->card->dpcm_lock, flags);
+ snd_soc_dpcm_fe_unlock_irq(fe, stream);

/* it's safe to do this BE DAI */
return ret;
--
2.25.1


2021-10-15 12:49:36

by Sameer Pujar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/13] ASoC: soc-pcm: introduce snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq/unlock_irq()



On 10/13/2021 8:00 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> In preparation for more changes, add two new helpers to gradually
> modify the DPCM locks.
>
> Since DPCM functions are not used from interrupt handlers, we can only
> use the lock_irq case.
>
> While most of the uses of DPCM are internal to soc-pcm.c, some drivers
> in soc/fsl and soc/sh do make use of DPCM-related loops that will
> require protection, adding EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is needed for those
> drivers.
>
> The stream argument is unused in this patch but will be enabled in
> follow-up patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/sound/soc-dpcm.h | 3 +++
> sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

1. Till this patch and with DEBUG_LOCKDEP config enabled, I see
following warning:
   "WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10
warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40"

   However test passed though. Interestingly it was seen only for the
first time I ran a 2x1 mixer test.

2. Also after I load sound modules and card gets registered, I see some
hw_param() calls for FE and BE. This seems harmless at this point, but
is getting problematic with subsequent patches. This was not happening
earier.

2021-10-15 22:50:13

by Pierre-Louis Bossart

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/13] ASoC: soc-pcm: introduce snd_soc_dpcm_fe_lock_irq/unlock_irq()



On 10/15/21 1:24 AM, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/2021 8:00 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> In preparation for more changes, add two new helpers to gradually
>> modify the DPCM locks.
>>
>> Since DPCM functions are not used from interrupt handlers, we can only
>> use the lock_irq case.
>>
>> While most of the uses of DPCM are internal to soc-pcm.c, some drivers
>> in soc/fsl and soc/sh do make use of DPCM-related loops that will
>> require protection, adding EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() is needed for those
>> drivers.
>>
>> The stream argument is unused in this patch but will be enabled in
>> follow-up patches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart
>> <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   include/sound/soc-dpcm.h |  3 +++
>>   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c      | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>   2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> 1. Till this patch and with DEBUG_LOCKDEP config enabled, I see

Did you mean "with this patch included", yes?

> following warning:
>    "WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10
> warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40"
>
>    However test passed though. Interestingly it was seen only for the
> first time I ran a 2x1 mixer test.
>
> 2. Also after I load sound modules and card gets registered, I see some
> hw_param() calls for FE and BE. This seems harmless at this point, but
> is getting problematic with subsequent patches. This was not happening
> earier.

This patch doesn't change any of the flow, it just adds a wrapper in
preparation for the transition to the FE pcm lock.

The only change is that we use spin_lock_irq instead of the
irqsave/restore version, but that was also Takashi's recommendation.

the test results would suggest that on Tegra DPCM functions are used
from an interrupt context?