2020-06-20 06:19:52

by Jia Yang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fix double free for gbo in drm_gem_vram_init and drm_gem_vram_create

I got a use-after-free report when doing some fuzz test:

If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" will be
freed by ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But
then drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free
"gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" again.

BUG: KMSAN: use-after-free in drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150
CPU: 0 PID: 24282 Comm: syz-executor.1 Tainted: G B W 5.7.0-rc4-msan #2
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
__dump_stack
dump_stack+0x1c9/0x220
kmsan_report+0xf7/0x1e0
__msan_warning+0x58/0xa0
drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150
drm_gem_free_mmap_offset
drm_gem_object_release+0x159/0x180
drm_gem_vram_init
drm_gem_vram_create+0x7c5/0x990
drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb
drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590
drm_mode_create_dumb
drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450
drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710
drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240
vfs_ioctl
ksys_ioctl
__do_sys_ioctl
__se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70
do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x4689b9
Code: fd e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 cb e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f368fa4dc98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000076bf00 RCX: 00000000004689b9
RDX: 0000000020000240 RSI: 00000000c02064b2 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00000000004d17e0 R14: 00007f368fa4e6d4 R15: 000000000076bf0c

Uninit was created at:
kmsan_save_stack_with_flags
kmsan_internal_poison_shadow+0x66/0xd0
kmsan_slab_free+0x6e/0xb0
slab_free_freelist_hook
slab_free
kfree+0x571/0x30a0
drm_gem_vram_destroy
ttm_buffer_object_destroy+0xc8/0x130
ttm_bo_release
kref_put
ttm_bo_put+0x117d/0x23e0
ttm_bo_init_reserved+0x11c0/0x11d0
ttm_bo_init+0x289/0x3f0
drm_gem_vram_init
drm_gem_vram_create+0x775/0x990
drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb
drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590
drm_mode_create_dumb
drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450
drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710
drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240
vfs_ioctl
ksys_ioctl
__do_sys_ioctl
__se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70
do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" will be freed by
ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But then
drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free
"gbo" again.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jia Yang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 28 +++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
index 8b2d5c945c95..1d85af9a481a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
@@ -175,6 +175,10 @@ static void drm_gem_vram_placement(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo,
}
}

+/*
+ * Note that on error, drm_gem_vram_init will free the buffer object.
+ */
+
static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo,
size_t size, unsigned long pg_align)
@@ -184,15 +188,19 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
int ret;
size_t acc_size;

- if (WARN_ONCE(!vmm, "VRAM MM not initialized"))
+ if (WARN_ONCE(!vmm, "VRAM MM not initialized")) {
+ kfree(gbo);
return -EINVAL;
+ }
bdev = &vmm->bdev;

gbo->bo.base.funcs = &drm_gem_vram_object_funcs;

ret = drm_gem_object_init(dev, &gbo->bo.base, size);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ kfree(gbo);
return ret;
+ }

acc_size = ttm_bo_dma_acc_size(bdev, size, sizeof(*gbo));

@@ -203,13 +211,13 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
&gbo->placement, pg_align, false, acc_size,
NULL, NULL, ttm_buffer_object_destroy);
if (ret)
- goto err_drm_gem_object_release;
+ /*
+ * A failing ttm_bo_init will call ttm_buffer_object_destroy
+ * to release gbo->bo.base and kfree gbo.
+ */
+ return ret;

return 0;
-
-err_drm_gem_object_release:
- drm_gem_object_release(&gbo->bo.base);
- return ret;
}

/**
@@ -243,13 +251,9 @@ struct drm_gem_vram_object *drm_gem_vram_create(struct drm_device *dev,

ret = drm_gem_vram_init(dev, gbo, size, pg_align);
if (ret < 0)
- goto err_kfree;
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);

return gbo;
-
-err_kfree:
- kfree(gbo);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vram_create);

--
2.26.0.106.g9fadedd


2020-07-01 02:34:05

by Jia Yang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fix double free for gbo in drm_gem_vram_init and drm_gem_vram_create

Ping...

On 2020/6/20 14:21, Jia Yang wrote:
> I got a use-after-free report when doing some fuzz test:
>
> If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" will be
> freed by ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But
> then drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free
> "gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" again.
>
> BUG: KMSAN: use-after-free in drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150
> CPU: 0 PID: 24282 Comm: syz-executor.1 Tainted: G B W 5.7.0-rc4-msan #2
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
> __dump_stack
> dump_stack+0x1c9/0x220
> kmsan_report+0xf7/0x1e0
> __msan_warning+0x58/0xa0
> drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150
> drm_gem_free_mmap_offset
> drm_gem_object_release+0x159/0x180
> drm_gem_vram_init
> drm_gem_vram_create+0x7c5/0x990
> drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb
> drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590
> drm_mode_create_dumb
> drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450
> drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710
> drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240
> vfs_ioctl
> ksys_ioctl
> __do_sys_ioctl
> __se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70
> do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> RIP: 0033:0x4689b9
> Code: fd e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 cb e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
> RSP: 002b:00007f368fa4dc98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000076bf00 RCX: 00000000004689b9
> RDX: 0000000020000240 RSI: 00000000c02064b2 RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00000000004d17e0 R14: 00007f368fa4e6d4 R15: 000000000076bf0c
>
> Uninit was created at:
> kmsan_save_stack_with_flags
> kmsan_internal_poison_shadow+0x66/0xd0
> kmsan_slab_free+0x6e/0xb0
> slab_free_freelist_hook
> slab_free
> kfree+0x571/0x30a0
> drm_gem_vram_destroy
> ttm_buffer_object_destroy+0xc8/0x130
> ttm_bo_release
> kref_put
> ttm_bo_put+0x117d/0x23e0
> ttm_bo_init_reserved+0x11c0/0x11d0
> ttm_bo_init+0x289/0x3f0
> drm_gem_vram_init
> drm_gem_vram_create+0x775/0x990
> drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb
> drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590
> drm_mode_create_dumb
> drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450
> drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710
> drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240
> vfs_ioctl
> ksys_ioctl
> __do_sys_ioctl
> __se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70
> do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>
> If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" will be freed by
> ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But then
> drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free
> "gbo" again.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Yang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 28 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
> index 8b2d5c945c95..1d85af9a481a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,10 @@ static void drm_gem_vram_placement(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo,
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Note that on error, drm_gem_vram_init will free the buffer object.
> + */
> +
> static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo,
> size_t size, unsigned long pg_align)
> @@ -184,15 +188,19 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> int ret;
> size_t acc_size;
>
> - if (WARN_ONCE(!vmm, "VRAM MM not initialized"))
> + if (WARN_ONCE(!vmm, "VRAM MM not initialized")) {
> + kfree(gbo);
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
> bdev = &vmm->bdev;
>
> gbo->bo.base.funcs = &drm_gem_vram_object_funcs;
>
> ret = drm_gem_object_init(dev, &gbo->bo.base, size);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(gbo);
> return ret;
> + }
>
> acc_size = ttm_bo_dma_acc_size(bdev, size, sizeof(*gbo));
>
> @@ -203,13 +211,13 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> &gbo->placement, pg_align, false, acc_size,
> NULL, NULL, ttm_buffer_object_destroy);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_drm_gem_object_release;
> + /*
> + * A failing ttm_bo_init will call ttm_buffer_object_destroy
> + * to release gbo->bo.base and kfree gbo.
> + */
> + return ret;
>
> return 0;
> -
> -err_drm_gem_object_release:
> - drm_gem_object_release(&gbo->bo.base);
> - return ret;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -243,13 +251,9 @@ struct drm_gem_vram_object *drm_gem_vram_create(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> ret = drm_gem_vram_init(dev, gbo, size, pg_align);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto err_kfree;
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> return gbo;
> -
> -err_kfree:
> - kfree(gbo);
> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vram_create);
>
>

2020-07-01 06:59:36

by Thomas Zimmermann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fix double free for gbo in drm_gem_vram_init and drm_gem_vram_create

Hi

Thanks for the patch and apologies for being late with the review.

The fix is good, but I'd like to see different approach. I'd rather have
drm_gem_vram_init() being integrated into drm_gem_vram_create().

Do you prefer to make the patch or shall I type up something? Would you
be able to test?

I have some comments on the resulting changes below.

Am 01.07.20 um 04:32 schrieb Jia Yang:
> Ping...
>
> On 2020/6/20 14:21, Jia Yang wrote:
>> I got a use-after-free report when doing some fuzz test:
>>
>> If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" will be
>> freed by ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But
>> then drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free
>> "gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" again.
>>
>> BUG: KMSAN: use-after-free in drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150
>> CPU: 0 PID: 24282 Comm: syz-executor.1 Tainted: G B W 5.7.0-rc4-msan #2
>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
>> Call Trace:
>> __dump_stack
>> dump_stack+0x1c9/0x220
>> kmsan_report+0xf7/0x1e0
>> __msan_warning+0x58/0xa0
>> drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150
>> drm_gem_free_mmap_offset
>> drm_gem_object_release+0x159/0x180
>> drm_gem_vram_init
>> drm_gem_vram_create+0x7c5/0x990
>> drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb
>> drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590
>> drm_mode_create_dumb
>> drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450
>> drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710
>> drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240
>> vfs_ioctl
>> ksys_ioctl
>> __do_sys_ioctl
>> __se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410
>> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70
>> do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>> RIP: 0033:0x4689b9
>> Code: fd e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 cb e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
>> RSP: 002b:00007f368fa4dc98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000076bf00 RCX: 00000000004689b9
>> RDX: 0000000020000240 RSI: 00000000c02064b2 RDI: 0000000000000003
>> RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
>> R13: 00000000004d17e0 R14: 00007f368fa4e6d4 R15: 000000000076bf0c
>>
>> Uninit was created at:
>> kmsan_save_stack_with_flags
>> kmsan_internal_poison_shadow+0x66/0xd0
>> kmsan_slab_free+0x6e/0xb0
>> slab_free_freelist_hook
>> slab_free
>> kfree+0x571/0x30a0
>> drm_gem_vram_destroy
>> ttm_buffer_object_destroy+0xc8/0x130
>> ttm_bo_release
>> kref_put
>> ttm_bo_put+0x117d/0x23e0
>> ttm_bo_init_reserved+0x11c0/0x11d0
>> ttm_bo_init+0x289/0x3f0
>> drm_gem_vram_init
>> drm_gem_vram_create+0x775/0x990
>> drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb
>> drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590
>> drm_mode_create_dumb
>> drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450
>> drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710
>> drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240
>> vfs_ioctl
>> ksys_ioctl
>> __do_sys_ioctl
>> __se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410
>> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70
>> do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>
>> If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" will be freed by
>> ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But then
>> drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free
>> "gbo" again.
>>
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia Yang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 28 +++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
>> index 8b2d5c945c95..1d85af9a481a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
>> @@ -175,6 +175,10 @@ static void drm_gem_vram_placement(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Note that on error, drm_gem_vram_init will free the buffer object.
>> + */
>> +

This comment could go away.

>> static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>> struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo,
>> size_t size, unsigned long pg_align)
>> @@ -184,15 +188,19 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>> int ret;
>> size_t acc_size;
>>
>> - if (WARN_ONCE(!vmm, "VRAM MM not initialized"))
>> + if (WARN_ONCE(!vmm, "VRAM MM not initialized")) {
>> + kfree(gbo);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> + }

This test can go to the top of drm_gem_vram_create()

>> bdev = &vmm->bdev;
>>
>> gbo->bo.base.funcs = &drm_gem_vram_object_funcs;
>>
>> ret = drm_gem_object_init(dev, &gbo->bo.base, size);
>> - if (ret)
>> + if (ret) {
>> + kfree(gbo);
>> return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> acc_size = ttm_bo_dma_acc_size(bdev, size, sizeof(*gbo));
>>
>> @@ -203,13 +211,13 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>> &gbo->placement, pg_align, false, acc_size,
>> NULL, NULL, ttm_buffer_object_destroy);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto err_drm_gem_object_release;
>> + /*
>> + * A failing ttm_bo_init will call ttm_buffer_object_destroy
>> + * to release gbo->bo.base and kfree gbo.
>> + */
>> + return ret;

The rest of this function would be inlined where the call to
drm_gem_vram_init() currently happens.

>>
>> return 0;
>> -
>> -err_drm_gem_object_release:
>> - drm_gem_object_release(&gbo->bo.base);
>> - return ret;
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -243,13 +251,9 @@ struct drm_gem_vram_object *drm_gem_vram_create(struct drm_device *dev,
>>
>> ret = drm_gem_vram_init(dev, gbo, size, pg_align);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> - goto err_kfree;
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>
>> return gbo;
>> -
>> -err_kfree:
>> - kfree(gbo);
>> - return ERR_PTR(ret);

All inlined code up to ttm_bo_init() would jump to error labels on
errors. ttm_bo_init() would return directly.

Best regards
Thomas


>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vram_create);
>>
>>

--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer


Attachments:
signature.asc (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2020-07-01 10:13:50

by Jia Yang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fix double free for gbo in drm_gem_vram_init and drm_gem_vram_create

Thanks for your suggestion, I can make the patch. But the
problem is reported by tool "Hulk Robot" and only happen
one time. No scripts are left, so I have no exact environment
to test.


On 2020/7/1 14:56, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the patch and apologies for being late with the review.
>
> The fix is good, but I'd like to see different approach. I'd rather have
> drm_gem_vram_init() being integrated into drm_gem_vram_create().
>
> Do you prefer to make the patch or shall I type up something? Would you
> be able to test?
>
> I have some comments on the resulting changes below.
>
> Am 01.07.20 um 04:32 schrieb Jia Yang:
>> Ping...
>>
>> On 2020/6/20 14:21, Jia Yang wrote:
>>> I got a use-after-free report when doing some fuzz test:
>>>
>>> If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" will be
>>> freed by ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But
>>> then drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free
>>> "gbo" and "gbo->bo.base" again.
>>>
>>> BUG: KMSAN: use-after-free in drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150
>>> CPU: 0 PID: 24282 Comm: syz-executor.1 Tainted: G B W 5.7.0-rc4-msan #2
>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
>>> Call Trace:
>>> __dump_stack
>>> dump_stack+0x1c9/0x220
>>> kmsan_report+0xf7/0x1e0
>>> __msan_warning+0x58/0xa0
>>> drm_vma_offset_remove+0xb3/0x150
>>> drm_gem_free_mmap_offset
>>> drm_gem_object_release+0x159/0x180
>>> drm_gem_vram_init
>>> drm_gem_vram_create+0x7c5/0x990
>>> drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb
>>> drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590
>>> drm_mode_create_dumb
>>> drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450
>>> drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710
>>> drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240
>>> vfs_ioctl
>>> ksys_ioctl
>>> __do_sys_ioctl
>>> __se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410
>>> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70
>>> do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>> RIP: 0033:0x4689b9
>>> Code: fd e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 cb e0 fa ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
>>> RSP: 002b:00007f368fa4dc98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000076bf00 RCX: 00000000004689b9
>>> RDX: 0000000020000240 RSI: 00000000c02064b2 RDI: 0000000000000003
>>> RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
>>> R13: 00000000004d17e0 R14: 00007f368fa4e6d4 R15: 000000000076bf0c
>>>
>>> Uninit was created at:
>>> kmsan_save_stack_with_flags
>>> kmsan_internal_poison_shadow+0x66/0xd0
>>> kmsan_slab_free+0x6e/0xb0
>>> slab_free_freelist_hook
>>> slab_free
>>> kfree+0x571/0x30a0
>>> drm_gem_vram_destroy
>>> ttm_buffer_object_destroy+0xc8/0x130
>>> ttm_bo_release
>>> kref_put
>>> ttm_bo_put+0x117d/0x23e0
>>> ttm_bo_init_reserved+0x11c0/0x11d0
>>> ttm_bo_init+0x289/0x3f0
>>> drm_gem_vram_init
>>> drm_gem_vram_create+0x775/0x990
>>> drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb
>>> drm_gem_vram_driver_dumb_create+0x238/0x590
>>> drm_mode_create_dumb
>>> drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl+0x41d/0x450
>>> drm_ioctl_kernel+0x5a4/0x710
>>> drm_ioctl+0xc6f/0x1240
>>> vfs_ioctl
>>> ksys_ioctl
>>> __do_sys_ioctl
>>> __se_sys_ioctl+0x2e9/0x410
>>> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70
>>> do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x160
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>>
>>> If ttm_bo_init() fails, the "gbo" will be freed by
>>> ttm_buffer_object_destroy() in ttm_bo_init(). But then
>>> drm_gem_vram_create() and drm_gem_vram_init() will free
>>> "gbo" again.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jia Yang <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 28 +++++++++++++++------------
>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
>>> index 8b2d5c945c95..1d85af9a481a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
>>> @@ -175,6 +175,10 @@ static void drm_gem_vram_placement(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Note that on error, drm_gem_vram_init will free the buffer object.
>>> + */
>>> +
>
> This comment could go away.
>
>>> static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>>> struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo,
>>> size_t size, unsigned long pg_align)
>>> @@ -184,15 +188,19 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>>> int ret;
>>> size_t acc_size;
>>>
>>> - if (WARN_ONCE(!vmm, "VRAM MM not initialized"))
>>> + if (WARN_ONCE(!vmm, "VRAM MM not initialized")) {
>>> + kfree(gbo);
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>
> This test can go to the top of drm_gem_vram_create()
>
>>> bdev = &vmm->bdev;
>>>
>>> gbo->bo.base.funcs = &drm_gem_vram_object_funcs;
>>>
>>> ret = drm_gem_object_init(dev, &gbo->bo.base, size);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + kfree(gbo);
>>> return ret;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> acc_size = ttm_bo_dma_acc_size(bdev, size, sizeof(*gbo));
>>>
>>> @@ -203,13 +211,13 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>>> &gbo->placement, pg_align, false, acc_size,
>>> NULL, NULL, ttm_buffer_object_destroy);
>>> if (ret)
>>> - goto err_drm_gem_object_release;
>>> + /*
>>> + * A failing ttm_bo_init will call ttm_buffer_object_destroy
>>> + * to release gbo->bo.base and kfree gbo.
>>> + */
>>> + return ret;
>
> The rest of this function would be inlined where the call to
> drm_gem_vram_init() currently happens.
>
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> -
>>> -err_drm_gem_object_release:
>>> - drm_gem_object_release(&gbo->bo.base);
>>> - return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -243,13 +251,9 @@ struct drm_gem_vram_object *drm_gem_vram_create(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>
>>> ret = drm_gem_vram_init(dev, gbo, size, pg_align);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> - goto err_kfree;
>>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>
>>> return gbo;
>>> -
>>> -err_kfree:
>>> - kfree(gbo);
>>> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> All inlined code up to ttm_bo_init() would jump to error labels on
> errors. ttm_bo_init() would return directly.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vram_create);
>>>
>>>
>