We don't want to use the value of ilog2(0) as dummy.buswidth is 0 when
dummy.nbytes is 0. Since we have no dummy bytes, we don't need to
configure the dummy byte bits per clock register value anyway.
Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <[email protected]>
---
drivers/spi/spi-npcm-fiu.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-npcm-fiu.c b/drivers/spi/spi-npcm-fiu.c
index 0ca21ff0e9cc..e42248519688 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-npcm-fiu.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-npcm-fiu.c
@@ -353,8 +353,9 @@ static int npcm_fiu_uma_read(struct spi_mem *mem,
uma_cfg |= ilog2(op->cmd.buswidth);
uma_cfg |= ilog2(op->addr.buswidth)
<< NPCM_FIU_UMA_CFG_ADBPCK_SHIFT;
- uma_cfg |= ilog2(op->dummy.buswidth)
- << NPCM_FIU_UMA_CFG_DBPCK_SHIFT;
+ if (op->dummy.nbytes)
+ uma_cfg |= ilog2(op->dummy.buswidth)
+ << NPCM_FIU_UMA_CFG_DBPCK_SHIFT;
uma_cfg |= ilog2(op->data.buswidth)
<< NPCM_FIU_UMA_CFG_RDBPCK_SHIFT;
uma_cfg |= op->dummy.nbytes << NPCM_FIU_UMA_CFG_DBSIZ_SHIFT;
--
2.42.0.515.g380fc7ccd1-goog
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:28:12 -0700, William A. Kennington III wrote:
> We don't want to use the value of ilog2(0) as dummy.buswidth is 0 when
> dummy.nbytes is 0. Since we have no dummy bytes, we don't need to
> configure the dummy byte bits per clock register value anyway.
>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: npcm-fiu: Fix UMA reads when dummy.nbytes == 0
commit: 2ec8b010979036c2fe79a64adb6ecc0bd11e91d1
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 03:39:43PM -0700, William Kennington wrote:
> > All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> > tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> > the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> > problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or
> Should I have marked this as a fix? I realized this after the fact but I
> need this backported to stable tree in order for my spi device to not crash
> the kernel.
Yes, although given the way stable picks things up there's a good chance
they'll grab it anyway based on the changelog. You can mail the stable
maintainers and ask for a backport once it hits Linus' tree to make
sure.