On 5/9/2024 4:56 AM, Ruirui Yang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:33:48PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> From: Ashish Kalra <[email protected]>
>>
>> With SNP guest kexec observe the following efi memmap corruption :
>>
>> [ 0.000000] efi: EFI v2.7 by EDK II
>> [ 0.000000] efi: SMBIOS=0x7e33f000 SMBIOS 3.0=0x7e33d000 ACPI=0x7e57e000 ACPI 2.0=0x7e57e014 MEMATTR=0x7cc3c018 Unaccepted=0x7c09e018
>> [ 0.000000] efi: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid EFI memory map entries:
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem03: [type=269370880|attr=0x0e42100e42180e41] range=[0x0486200e41038c18-0x200e898a0eee713ac17] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem04: [type=12336|attr=0x0e410686300e4105] range=[0x100e420000000176-0x8c290f26248d200e175] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem06: [type=1124304408|attr=0x000030b400000028] range=[0x0e51300e45280e77-0xb44ed2142f460c1e76] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem08: [type=68|attr=0x300e540583280e41] range=[0x0000011affff3cd8-0x486200e54b38c0bcd7] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem10: [type=1107529240|attr=0x0e42280e41300e41] range=[0x300e41058c280e42-0x38010ae54c5c328ee41] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem11: [type=189335566|attr=0x048d200e42038e18] range=[0x0000318c00000048-0xe42029228ce4200047] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem12: [type=239142534|attr=0x0000002400000b4b] range=[0x0e41380e0a7d700e-0x80f26238f22bfe500d] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem14: [type=239207055|attr=0x0e41300e43380e0a] range=[0x8c280e42048d200e-0xc70b028f2f27cc0a00d] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem15: [type=239210510|attr=0x00080e660b47080e] range=[0x0000324c0000001c-0xa78028634ce490001b] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem16: [type=4294848528|attr=0x0000329400000014] range=[0x0e410286100e4100-0x80f252036a218f20ff] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem19: [type=2250772033|attr=0x42180e42200e4328] range=[0x41280e0ab9020683-0xe0e538c28b39e62682] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem20: [type=16| | | | | | | | | | |WB| |WC| ] range=[0x00000008ffff4438-0xffff44340090333c437] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem22: [Reserved |attr=0x000000c1ffff4420] range=[0xffff442400003398-0x1033a04240003f397] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem23: [type=1141080856|attr=0x080e41100e43180e] range=[0x280e66300e4b280e-0x440dc5ee7141f4c080d] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem25: [Reserved |attr=0x0000000affff44a0] range=[0xffff44a400003428-0x1034304a400013427] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem28: [type=16| | | | | | | | | | |WB| |WC| ] range=[0x0000000affff4488-0xffff448400b034bc487] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem30: [Reserved |attr=0x0000000affff4470] range=[0xffff447400003518-0x10352047400013517] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem33: [type=16| | | | | | | | | | |WB| |WC| ] range=[0x0000000affff4458-0xffff445400b035ac457] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem35: [type=269372416|attr=0x0e42100e42180e41] range=[0x0486200e44038c18-0x200e8b8a0eee823ac17] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem37: [type=2351435330|attr=0x0e42100e42180e42] range=[0x470783380e410686-0x2002b2a041c2141e685] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem38: [type=1093668417|attr=0x100e420000000270] range=[0x42100e42180e4220-0xfff366a4e421b78c21f] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem39: [type=76357646|attr=0x180e42200e42280e] range=[0x0e410686300e4105-0x4130f251a0710ae5104] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem40: [type=940444268|attr=0x0e42200e42280e41] range=[0x180e42200e42280e-0x300fc71c300b4f2480d] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem41: [MMIO |attr=0x8c280e42048d200e] range=[0xffff479400003728-0x42138e0c87820292727] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem42: [type=1191674680|attr=0x0000004c0000000b] range=[0x300e41380e0a0246-0x470b0f26238f22b8245] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem43: [type=2010|attr=0x0301f00e4d078338] range=[0x45038e180e42028f-0xe4556bf118f282528e] (invalid)
>> [ 0.000000] efi: mem44: [type=1109921345|attr=0x300e44000000006c] range=[0x44080e42100e4218-0xfff39254e42138ac217] (invalid)
>> ...
>>
>> This EFI memap corruption is happening with efi_arch_mem_reserve() invocation in case of kexec boot.
>>
>> ( efi_arch_mem_reserve() is invoked with the following call-stack: )
>>
>> [ 0.310010] efi_arch_mem_reserve+0xb1/0x220
>> [ 0.311382] efi_mem_reserve+0x36/0x60
>> [ 0.311973] efi_bgrt_init+0x17d/0x1a0
>> [ 0.313265] acpi_parse_bgrt+0x12/0x20
>> [ 0.313858] acpi_table_parse+0x77/0xd0
>> [ 0.314463] acpi_boot_init+0x362/0x630
>> [ 0.315069] setup_arch+0xa88/0xf80
>> [ 0.315629] start_kernel+0x68/0xa90
>> [ 0.316194] x86_64_start_reservations+0x1c/0x30
>> [ 0.316921] x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110
>> [ 0.317582] common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
>>
>> efi_arch_mem_reserve() calls efi_memmap_alloc() to allocate memory for
>> EFI memory map and due to early allocation it uses memblock allocation.
>>
>> Later during boot, efi_enter_virtual_mode() calls kexec_enter_virtual_mode()
>> in case of a kexec-ed kernel boot.
>>
>> This function kexec_enter_virtual_mode() installs the new EFI memory map by
>> calling efi_memmap_init_late() which remaps the efi_memmap physically allocated
>> in efi_arch_mem_reserve(), but this remapping is still using memblock allocation.
>>
>> Subsequently, when memblock is freed later in boot flow, this remapped
>> efi_memmap will have random corruption (similar to a use-after-free scenario).
>>
>> The corrupted EFI memory map is then passed to the next kexec-ed kernel
>> which causes a panic when trying to use the corrupted EFI memory map.
>>
>> Fix this EFI memory map corruption by skipping efi_arch_mem_reserve() for kexec.
>>
>> Additionally, skipping this function for kexec altogther makes sense
>> as for kexec use case need to use the the EFI memmap passed from first
>> kernel via setup_data and avoid any additional EFI memory map
>> additions/updates.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
>> index f0cc00032751..af7126d9c540 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
>> @@ -258,6 +258,26 @@ void __init efi_arch_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
>> int num_entries;
>> void *new;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * efi_arch_mem_reserve() calls efi_memmap_alloc() to allocate memory for
>> + * EFI memory map and due to early allocation it uses memblock allocation.
>> + * Later during boot, efi_enter_virtual_mode() calls kexec_enter_virtual_mode()
>> + * in case of a kexec-ed kernel boot. This function kexec_enter_virtual_mode()
>> + * installs the new EFI memory map by calling efi_memmap_init_late() which
>> + * remaps the efi_memmap physically allocated here in efi_arch_mem_reserve(),
>> + * but this remapping is still using memblock allocation.
>> + * Subsequently, when memblock is freed later in boot flow, this remapped
>> + * efi_memmap will have random corruption (similar to a use-after-free scenario).
>> + * The corrupted EFI memory map is then passed to the next kexec-ed kernel
>> + * which causes a panic when trying to use the corrupted EFI memory map.
>> + * Additionally, skipping this function for kexec altogther makes sense
>> + * as for kexec use case need to use the the EFI memmap passed from first
>> + * kernel via setup_data and avoid any additional EFI memory map
>> + * additions/updates.
>> + */
>> + if (efi_setup)
>> + return;
>> +
> efi_mem_reserve is used to reserve boot service memory eg. bgrt, but
> it is not necessary for kexec boot, as there are no boot services in
> kexec reboot at all after the 1st kernel ExitBootServices().
>
> The UEFI memmap passed to kexec kernel includes not only the runtime
> service memory map but also the boot service memory ranges which were
> reserved by the 1st kernel with efi_mem_reserve, and those boot service
> memory ranges have already been marked "EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME" attribute.
>
> Take example of bgrt, the saved memory is there only for people to check
> the bgrt image info via /sys/firmware/acpi/bgrt/*, and it is not used in
> early boot phase by boot services.
>
> Above is the reason why the efi_mem_reserve can be skipped for kexec
> booting. But as I suggested before I personally think that checking
> EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME attribute set or not looks better than checking
> efi_setup.
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
I will move back to checking the md attribute instead of checking
efi_setup as i was doing previously and resubmit this patch.
Thanks, Ashish
>
>> if (efi_mem_desc_lookup(addr, &md) ||
>> md.type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA) {
>> pr_err("Failed to lookup EFI memory descriptor for %pa\n", &addr);
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>