Hello Russell,
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> here is the next set of OMAP clock patches for review for the
> post-2.6.30 merge window. They apply on top of the previous set
> ("OMAP clock/SDRC patches on v2.6.30-rc5"). If you're happy with
> these patches, Tony will queue them up into his for-next branch.
>
> This series completes basic support for OMAP3 CORE DVFS. A few other
> minor bugs are fixed by the off-by-one patch and the GPIO debounce
> clock patch.
Any comments on these patches?
- Paul
* Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> [090609 10:14]:
> Hello Russell,
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2009, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > here is the next set of OMAP clock patches for review for the
> > post-2.6.30 merge window. They apply on top of the previous set
> > ("OMAP clock/SDRC patches on v2.6.30-rc5"). If you're happy with
> > these patches, Tony will queue them up into his for-next branch.
> >
> > This series completes basic support for OMAP3 CORE DVFS. A few other
> > minor bugs are fixed by the off-by-one patch and the GPIO debounce
> > clock patch.
>
> Any comments on these patches?
Paul, can you please post a git pull request for Russell on these?
I think these should still go in if possible.
Russell, if you think it's too late, I'll pile them up into omap
for-next branch.
Regards,
Tony
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:48:47AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Paul, can you please post a git pull request for Russell on these?
> I think these should still go in if possible.
>
> Russell, if you think it's too late, I'll pile them up into omap
> for-next branch.
Let's merge them.
Hi Paul, Russell, Tony,
On Friday 19 June 2009 18:23:42 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:48:47AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Paul, can you please post a git pull request for Russell on these?
> > I think these should still go in if possible.
> >
> > Russell, if you think it's too late, I'll pile them up into omap
> > for-next branch.
>
> Let's merge them.
Also, can you look at '[PATCH 0/2] Allows the SDRAM self refresh to work with
2 chip selects' which apply on top of Paul's SDRC patches?
Regards,
Jean
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> FAQ: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
> Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:48:47AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Paul, can you please post a git pull request for Russell on these?
> > I think these should still go in if possible.
> >
> > Russell, if you think it's too late, I'll pile them up into omap
> > for-next branch.
>
> Let's merge them.
The following changes since commit cd07ecc828486e5887113c7dc4d9f9022145811b:
Tony Lindgren (1):
Merge branch 'omap4' into for-next
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 omap-clock-for-next
Paul Walmsley (7):
OMAP3 clock: remove wait for DPLL3 M2 clock to stabilize
OMAP3 clock: initialize SDRC timings at kernel start
OMAP3 clock: add a short delay when lowering CORE clk rate
OMAP3 clock/SDRC: program SDRC_MR register during SDRC clock change
OMAP3 SRAM: add more comments on the SRAM code
OMAP3 SRAM: convert SRAM code to use macros rather than magic numbers
OMAP3 SDRC: set FIXEDDELAY when disabling SDRC DLL
Roel Kluin (1):
OMAP2 clock/powerdomain: off by 1 error in loop timeout comparisons
Tero Kristo (1):
OMAP3: Add support for DPLL3 divisor values higher than 2
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c | 42 ++++++++---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c | 36 +++++++++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/sram.h | 6 +-
arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c | 8 +-
7 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
- Paul
Hello Jean,
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Jean Pihet wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2009 18:23:42 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:48:47AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Paul, can you please post a git pull request for Russell on these?
> > > I think these should still go in if possible.
> > >
> > > Russell, if you think it's too late, I'll pile them up into omap
> > > for-next branch.
> >
> > Let's merge them.
> Also, can you look at '[PATCH 0/2] Allows the SDRAM self refresh to work with
> 2 chip selects' which apply on top of Paul's SDRC patches?
I'll merge these patches into the next SDRC series for Russell and Tony.
thanks,
- Paul