2012-05-18 13:40:29

by Joel Reardon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3] UBI: add lnum and vol_id to struct ubi_work

This is part of a multipart patch to allow UBI to force the erasure of
particular logical eraseblock numbers. In this patch, the volume id and LEB
number are added to ubi_work data structure, and both are also passed as a
parameter to schedule erase to set it appropriately. Whenever ubi_wl_put_peb
is called, the lnum is also passed to be forwarded to schedule erase. Later,
a new ubi_sync_lnum will be added to execute immediately all work related to
that lnum.

This was tested by outputting the vol_id and lnum during the schedule of
erasure. The ubi thread was disabled and two ubifs drives on separate
partitions repeated changed a small number of LEBs. The ubi module was readded, and all
the erased LEBs, corresponding to the volumes, were added to the schedule
erase queue.

Signed-off-by: Joel Reardon <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c | 16 ++++++++--------
drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h | 3 ++-
drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c
index bd5fdbf..4421540 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/eba.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ int ubi_eba_unmap_leb(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_volume *vol,
dbg_eba("erase LEB %d:%d, PEB %d", vol_id, lnum, pnum);

vol->eba_tbl[lnum] = UBI_LEB_UNMAPPED;
- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 0);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 0);

out_unlock:
leb_write_unlock(ubi, vol_id, lnum);
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ retry:
ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);

vol->eba_tbl[lnum] = new_pnum;
- ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 1);
+ ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 1);

ubi_msg("data was successfully recovered");
return 0;
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ retry:
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&ubi->buf_mutex);
out_put:
- ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, new_pnum, 1);
+ ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, new_pnum, 1);
ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);
return err;

@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ write_error:
* get another one.
*/
ubi_warn("failed to write to PEB %d", new_pnum);
- ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, new_pnum, 1);
+ ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, new_pnum, 1);
if (++tries > UBI_IO_RETRIES) {
ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);
return err;
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ write_error:
* eraseblock, so just put it and request a new one. We assume that if
* this physical eraseblock went bad, the erase code will handle that.
*/
- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 1);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 1);
if (err || ++tries > UBI_IO_RETRIES) {
ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
leb_write_unlock(ubi, vol_id, lnum);
@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ write_error:
return err;
}

- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 1);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 1);
if (err || ++tries > UBI_IO_RETRIES) {
ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
leb_write_unlock(ubi, vol_id, lnum);
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ retry:
}

if (vol->eba_tbl[lnum] >= 0) {
- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol->eba_tbl[lnum], 0);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, vol->eba_tbl[lnum], 0);
if (err)
goto out_leb_unlock;
}
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ write_error:
goto out_leb_unlock;
}

- err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, pnum, 1);
+ err = ubi_wl_put_peb(ubi, vol_id, lnum, pnum, 1);
if (err || ++tries > UBI_IO_RETRIES) {
ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
goto out_leb_unlock;
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
index 75b9f1c..05aa452 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
@@ -533,7 +533,8 @@ int ubi_eba_init_scan(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_scan_info *si);

/* wl.c */
int ubi_wl_get_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi);
-int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture);
+int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int vol_id, int lnum,
+ int pnum, int torture);
int ubi_wl_flush(struct ubi_device *ubi);
int ubi_wl_scrub_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum);
int ubi_wl_init_scan(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_scan_info *si);
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
index 64ce993..39bdc3b 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
@@ -140,6 +140,8 @@
* @list: a link in the list of pending works
* @func: worker function
* @e: physical eraseblock to erase
+ * @vol_id: the volume ID on which this erasure is being performed
+ * @lnum: the logical number of the erase block
* @torture: if the physical eraseblock has to be tortured
*
* The @func pointer points to the worker function. If the @cancel argument is
@@ -152,6 +154,8 @@ struct ubi_work {
int (*func)(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk, int cancel);
/* The below fields are only relevant to erasure works */
struct ubi_wl_entry *e;
+ int vol_id;
+ int lnum;
int torture;
};

@@ -586,13 +590,15 @@ static int erase_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wl_wrk,
* schedule_erase - schedule an erase work.
* @ubi: UBI device description object
* @e: the WL entry of the physical eraseblock to erase
+ * @vol_id: the volume ID that last used the eraseblock
+ * @lnum: the last used logical block number for the eraseblock
* @torture: if the physical eraseblock has to be tortured
*
* This function returns zero in case of success and a %-ENOMEM in case of
* failure.
*/
static int schedule_erase(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_wl_entry *e,
- int torture)
+ int vol_id, int lnum, int torture)
{
struct ubi_work *wl_wrk;

@@ -605,6 +611,8 @@ static int schedule_erase(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_wl_entry *e,

wl_wrk->func = &erase_worker;
wl_wrk->e = e;
+ wl_wrk->vol_id = vol_id;
+ wl_wrk->lnum = lnum;
wl_wrk->torture = torture;

schedule_ubi_work(ubi, wl_wrk);
@@ -805,7 +813,7 @@ static int wear_leveling_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk,
ubi->move_to_put = ubi->wl_scheduled = 0;
spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);

- err = schedule_erase(ubi, e1, 0);
+ err = schedule_erase(ubi, e1, vol_id, lnum, 0);
if (err) {
kmem_cache_free(ubi_wl_entry_slab, e1);
if (e2)
@@ -820,7 +828,7 @@ static int wear_leveling_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk,
*/
dbg_wl("PEB %d (LEB %d:%d) was put meanwhile, erase",
e2->pnum, vol_id, lnum);
- err = schedule_erase(ubi, e2, 0);
+ err = schedule_erase(ubi, e2, vol_id, lnum, 0);
if (err) {
kmem_cache_free(ubi_wl_entry_slab, e2);
goto out_ro;
@@ -859,7 +867,7 @@ out_not_moved:
spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);

ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);
- err = schedule_erase(ubi, e2, torture);
+ err = schedule_erase(ubi, e2, vol_id, lnum, torture);
if (err) {
kmem_cache_free(ubi_wl_entry_slab, e2);
goto out_ro;
@@ -978,6 +986,8 @@ static int erase_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wl_wrk,
{
struct ubi_wl_entry *e = wl_wrk->e;
int pnum = e->pnum, err, need;
+ int vol_id = wl_wrk->vol_id;
+ int lnum = wl_wrk->lnum;

if (cancel) {
dbg_wl("cancel erasure of PEB %d EC %d", pnum, e->ec);
@@ -986,7 +996,8 @@ static int erase_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wl_wrk,
return 0;
}

- dbg_wl("erase PEB %d EC %d", pnum, e->ec);
+ dbg_wl("erase PEB %d EC %d volume %d LEB %d",
+ pnum, e->ec, wl_wrk->vol_id, wl_wrk->lnum);

err = sync_erase(ubi, e, wl_wrk->torture);
if (!err) {
@@ -1016,7 +1027,7 @@ static int erase_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wl_wrk,
int err1;

/* Re-schedule the LEB for erasure */
- err1 = schedule_erase(ubi, e, 0);
+ err1 = schedule_erase(ubi, e, vol_id, lnum, 0);
if (err1) {
err = err1;
goto out_ro;
@@ -1084,6 +1095,8 @@ out_ro:
/**
* ubi_wl_put_peb - return a PEB to the wear-leveling sub-system.
* @ubi: UBI device description object
+ * @vol_id: the volume ID that last used the eraseblock
+ * @lnum: the last used logical eraseblock number for the PEB
* @pnum: physical eraseblock to return
* @torture: if this physical eraseblock has to be tortured
*
@@ -1092,7 +1105,8 @@ out_ro:
* occurred to this @pnum and it has to be tested. This function returns zero
* in case of success, and a negative error code in case of failure.
*/
-int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture)
+int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int vol_id, int lnum,
+ int pnum, int torture)
{
int err;
struct ubi_wl_entry *e;
@@ -1158,7 +1172,7 @@ retry:
}
spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);

- err = schedule_erase(ubi, e, torture);
+ err = schedule_erase(ubi, e, vol_id, lnum, torture);
if (err) {
spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
wl_tree_add(e, &ubi->used);
@@ -1423,7 +1437,7 @@ int ubi_wl_init_scan(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_scan_info *si)
e->pnum = seb->pnum;
e->ec = seb->ec;
ubi->lookuptbl[e->pnum] = e;
- if (schedule_erase(ubi, e, 0)) {
+ if (schedule_erase(ubi, e, seb->vol_id, seb->lnum, 0)) {
kmem_cache_free(ubi_wl_entry_slab, e);
goto out_free;
}
--
1.7.5.4


2012-05-18 14:17:42

by Artem Bityutskiy

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] UBI: add lnum and vol_id to struct ubi_work

On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 15:40 +0200, Joel Reardon wrote:
> This is part of a multipart patch to allow UBI to force the erasure of
> particular logical eraseblock numbers. In this patch, the volume id and LEB
> number are added to ubi_work data structure, and both are also passed as a
> parameter to schedule erase to set it appropriately. Whenever ubi_wl_put_peb
> is called, the lnum is also passed to be forwarded to schedule erase. Later,
> a new ubi_sync_lnum will be added to execute immediately all work related to
> that lnum.
>
> This was tested by outputting the vol_id and lnum during the schedule of
> erasure. The ubi thread was disabled and two ubifs drives on separate
> partitions repeated changed a small number of LEBs. The ubi module was readded, and all
> the erased LEBs, corresponding to the volumes, were added to the schedule
> erase queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Reardon <[email protected]>

Pushed to the "joel" branch, thanks. I did few amendments.

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy


Attachments:
signature.asc (836.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part