Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]> writes:
> Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Hi Guennadi,
>>
>> I've been cooking this since 2012. At that time, I thought the dmaengine API was
>> not rich enough to support the pxa_camera subtleties (or complexity).
>>
>> I was wrong. I submitted a driver to Vinod for a dma pxa driver which would
>> support everything needed to make pxa_camera work normally.
>>
>> As a consequence, I wrote this serie. Should the pxa-dma driver be accepted,
>> then this serie will be my next move towards pxa conversion to dmaengine. And to
>> parallelize the review work, I'll submit it right away to receive a review and
>> fix pxa_camera so that it is ready by the time pxa-dma is also reviewed.
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> Any update on this serie ? The pxa-dma driver is upstreamed now.
Guennadi, are you around ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
Hi Robert,
I've sent you two replies, did you get them? Spam filter?
Thanks
Guennadi
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> Hi Guennadi,
> >>
> >> I've been cooking this since 2012. At that time, I thought the dmaengine API was
> >> not rich enough to support the pxa_camera subtleties (or complexity).
> >>
> >> I was wrong. I submitted a driver to Vinod for a dma pxa driver which would
> >> support everything needed to make pxa_camera work normally.
> >>
> >> As a consequence, I wrote this serie. Should the pxa-dma driver be accepted,
> >> then this serie will be my next move towards pxa conversion to dmaengine. And to
> >> parallelize the review work, I'll submit it right away to receive a review and
> >> fix pxa_camera so that it is ready by the time pxa-dma is also reviewed.
> > Hi Guennadi,
> >
> > Any update on this serie ? The pxa-dma driver is upstreamed now.
>
> Guennadi, are you around ?
>
> Cheers.
>
> --
> Robert
>