Hi Roger,
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 05:03 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/18/2013 10:27 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> We don't need multiple aliases for the OMAP USB host clocks and neither
> >>>> the dummy clocks so remove them.
> >>>>
> >>>> CC: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>
> >>>> CC: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]>
> >>>> CC: Benoit Cousson <[email protected]>
> >>>> CC: Mike Turquette <[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <[email protected]>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
> >>>> Acked-by: Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> Per Tony's earlier request, you can drop this patch and patch 20 from your
> >>> series now. I've got them queued for 3.10 or late 3.9 merge window.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Should have mentioned it earlier, but just this patch without the rest
> >> of the cleanup patches will break USB Host on OMAP3, as the old driver
> >> bails out if optional clock nodes are missing.
> >>
> >> Including patch 20 doesn't seem to cause a problem with OMAP4 though.
> >
> > I've got these two patches queued for merging after your other patches go
> > upstream -- e.g., probably 3.10. Do you foresee any problems with that?
> >
>
> FYI, the usbhost patches are already in linux-next.
Queued this patch for v3.11; looks like I missed it for v3.10.
- Paul