2009-12-29 12:27:10

by Robert P. J. Day

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: any objection to a wide-sweeping "unifdef-y" -> "header-y" change?


given that the Kbuild "unifdef-y" directive was tagged as obsolete
in favour of "header-y" well over a year ago, any objection to just
standardizing everything on header-y and removing all support
for unifdef-y?

is there any compelling reason to *not* do that?

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================