On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > -#define SECURITY_NAME_MAX 10
> > > > +#define SECURITY_NAME_MAX 15
> > >
> > > Should this small hunk be a separate atomic patch?
> >
> > I thought about it, but this is the first and only LSM with a larger
> > name.
>
> Maybe the commit log should mention that then.
Actually, make it a separate patch, so we can easily pinpoint the commit.
--
James Morris
<[email protected]>
From 1583983478526947270@xxx Mon Nov 13 20:19:21 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583951102177024832
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread