On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 03:49:08PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Ack. And there is no MISC maintainer, so Jiri's patch to remove the
> entire entry makes sense IMO.
However misc devices exist, so no maintaner for them? I'd like to
propose a misc device and I'd like to have some suggestions about it,
so should I send my questions to the LKML?
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: [email protected]
Linux Device Driver [email protected]
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > Ack. And there is no MISC maintainer, so Jiri's patch to remove the
> > entire entry makes sense IMO.
> However misc devices exist, so no maintaner for them? I'd like to
> propose a misc device and I'd like to have some suggestions about it,
> so should I send my questions to the LKML?
If you have a driver that doesn't fit under any particular subsystem, it
therefore probably belongs into drivers/misc, yes.
Send them to LKML and CC Andrew Morton and possibly also Greg KH.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs