Hi James,
Included in this pull request are three bug fixes, assuming the 2 FUSE
patches are considered bugs and not new features, and a maintainer update.
I'd appreciate your sending them to Linus for 4.16.
thanks,
Mimi
The following changes since commit 36447456e1cca853188505f2a964dbbeacfc7a7a:
ima/policy: fix parsing of fsuuid (2018-01-18 16:52:49 -0500)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git next-integrity
for you to fetch changes up to d56f30ac85c067d0d3a6c4f293f655dc298cb5ce:
ima: force re-appraisal on filesystems with FS_IMA_NO_CACHE (2018-02-01 12:38:31 -0500)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Alban Crequy (2):
fuse: introduce new fs_type flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE
ima: force re-appraisal on filesystems with FS_IMA_NO_CACHE
Mimi Zohar (2):
ima: re-initialize iint->atomic_flags
maintainers: update trusted keys
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 +-
include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
security/integrity/iint.c | 1 +
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Included in this pull request are three bug fixes, assuming the 2 FUSE
> patches are considered bugs and not new features, and a maintainer update.
> I'd appreciate your sending them to Linus for 4.16.
I'd like to see an acked-by or reviewed-by from the FUSE maintainer
(cc'd), on the FUSE patches.
>
> Mimi
>
> The following changes since commit 36447456e1cca853188505f2a964dbbeacfc7a7a:
>
> ima/policy: fix parsing of fsuuid (2018-01-18 16:52:49 -0500)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git next-integrity
>
> for you to fetch changes up to d56f30ac85c067d0d3a6c4f293f655dc298cb5ce:
>
> ima: force re-appraisal on filesystems with FS_IMA_NO_CACHE (2018-02-01 12:38:31 -0500)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Alban Crequy (2):
> fuse: introduce new fs_type flag FS_IMA_NO_CACHE
> ima: force re-appraisal on filesystems with FS_IMA_NO_CACHE
>
> Mimi Zohar (2):
> ima: re-initialize iint->atomic_flags
> maintainers: update trusted keys
>
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> security/integrity/iint.c | 1 +
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
--
James Morris
<[email protected]>
On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 21:07 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> > Hi James,
> >
> > Included in this pull request are three bug fixes, assuming the 2 FUSE
> > patches are considered bugs and not new features, and a maintainer update.
> > I'd appreciate your sending them to Linus for 4.16.
>
> I'd like to see an acked-by or reviewed-by from the FUSE maintainer
> (cc'd), on the FUSE patches.
Ok. For now, can you take the first two patches?
Mimi
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 21:07 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > Included in this pull request are three bug fixes, assuming the 2 FUSE
> > > patches are considered bugs and not new features, and a maintainer update.
> > > I'd appreciate your sending them to Linus for 4.16.
> >
> > I'd like to see an acked-by or reviewed-by from the FUSE maintainer
> > (cc'd), on the FUSE patches.
>
> Ok. For now, can you take the first two patches?
Sure.
--
James Morris
<[email protected]>