2018-10-09 00:46:59

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] security: fix LSM description location

From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

Fix Documentation location reference for where LSM descriptions should
be placed.

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Cc: James Morris <[email protected]>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
Documentation/security/LSM.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- lnx-419-rc7.orig/Documentation/security/LSM.rst
+++ lnx-419-rc7/Documentation/security/LSM.rst
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Linux Security Module Development
Based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/26/215,
a new LSM is accepted into the kernel when its intent (a description of
what it tries to protect against and in what cases one would expect to
-use it) has been appropriately documented in ``Documentation/security/LSM.rst``.
+use it) has been appropriately documented in ``Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/``.
This allows an LSM's code to be easily compared to its goals, and so
that end users and distros can make a more informed decision about which
LSMs suit their requirements.




2018-10-09 01:40:49

by Kees Cook

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: fix LSM description location

On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
>
> Fix Documentation location reference for where LSM descriptions should
> be placed.
>
> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> Cc: James Morris <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]

Thanks!

Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

Jon, can you take this?

-Kees

> ---
> Documentation/security/LSM.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- lnx-419-rc7.orig/Documentation/security/LSM.rst
> +++ lnx-419-rc7/Documentation/security/LSM.rst
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Linux Security Module Development
> Based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/26/215,
> a new LSM is accepted into the kernel when its intent (a description of
> what it tries to protect against and in what cases one would expect to
> -use it) has been appropriately documented in ``Documentation/security/LSM.rst``.
> +use it) has been appropriately documented in ``Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/``.
> This allows an LSM's code to be easily compared to its goals, and so
> that end users and distros can make a more informed decision about which
> LSMs suit their requirements.
>
>



--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

2018-10-09 19:27:11

by James Morris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: fix LSM description location

On Mon, 8 Oct 2018, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
>
> Fix Documentation location reference for where LSM descriptions should
> be placed.
>
> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> Cc: James Morris <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]

Applied to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git next-general

--
James Morris
<[email protected]>