Use list_first_entry_or_null to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 86d265500cf6..55c65abcad64 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -234,10 +234,7 @@ static inline struct mptcp_data_frag *mptcp_rtx_head(const struct sock *sk)
{
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
- if (list_empty(&msk->rtx_queue))
- return NULL;
-
- return list_first_entry(&msk->rtx_queue, struct mptcp_data_frag, list);
+ return list_first_entry_or_null(&msk->rtx_queue, struct mptcp_data_frag, list);
}
struct mptcp_subflow_request_sock {
--
2.17.1
Hello Geliang,
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Use list_first_entry_or_null to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index 86d265500cf6..55c65abcad64 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -234,10 +234,7 @@ static inline struct mptcp_data_frag *mptcp_rtx_head(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
>
> - if (list_empty(&msk->rtx_queue))
> - return NULL;
> -
> - return list_first_entry(&msk->rtx_queue, struct mptcp_data_frag, list);
> + return list_first_entry_or_null(&msk->rtx_queue, struct mptcp_data_frag, list);
> }
>
> struct mptcp_subflow_request_sock {
> --
> 2.17.1
As Matthieu mentioned on your earlier patch, please submit patches to
netdev with either a [PATCH net] or [PATCH net-next] tag. In this case,
these are non-critical bug fixes so they should be targeted at net-next.
Note that net-next branch is currently closed to submissions due to the
v5.8 merge window. Please resubmit both MPTCP patches for net-next when
David announces that it is open again. The change does look ok but will
not be merged now.
Thanks for your patch,
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:22:31AM -0700, Mat Martineau wrote:
>
> Hello Geliang,
>
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2020, Geliang Tang wrote:
>
> > Use list_first_entry_or_null to simplify the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > net/mptcp/protocol.h | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> > index 86d265500cf6..55c65abcad64 100644
> > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> > @@ -234,10 +234,7 @@ static inline struct mptcp_data_frag *mptcp_rtx_head(const struct sock *sk)
> > {
> > struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> >
> > - if (list_empty(&msk->rtx_queue))
> > - return NULL;
> > -
> > - return list_first_entry(&msk->rtx_queue, struct mptcp_data_frag, list);
> > + return list_first_entry_or_null(&msk->rtx_queue, struct mptcp_data_frag, list);
> > }
> >
> > struct mptcp_subflow_request_sock {
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
> As Matthieu mentioned on your earlier patch, please submit patches to netdev
> with either a [PATCH net] or [PATCH net-next] tag. In this case, these are
> non-critical bug fixes so they should be targeted at net-next.
>
> Note that net-next branch is currently closed to submissions due to the v5.8
> merge window. Please resubmit both MPTCP patches for net-next when David
> announces that it is open again. The change does look ok but will not be
> merged now.
>
> Thanks for your patch,
>
> --
> Mat Martineau
> Intel
Hi Mat,
Thanks for your reply.
I have already resend patch v2 to you.
-Geliang