2022-12-05 10:11:07

by Xinghui Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add the backport commit format check

From: Xinghui Li <[email protected]>

The backport commit has been used to be misreported as Error
by checkpatch.pl like this:

'ERROR: Please use git commit description style
'commit <12+ chars of sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie:......
commit <sha1> upstream.

total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 8 lines checked
'
So, add the backport commit format check to avoid the above mistake.

Signed-off-by: Xinghui Li <[email protected]>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 1e5e66ae5a52..92ba39418239 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3252,6 +3252,10 @@ sub process {
# A correctly formed commit description is:
# commit <SHA-1 hash length 12+ chars> ("Complete commit subject")
# with the commit subject '("' prefix and '")' suffix
+# A correctly formed backport commit description is:
+# commit <sha1> upstream.
+# or
+# [ Upstream commit <sha1> ]
# This is a fairly compilicated block as it tests for what appears to be
# bare SHA-1 hash with minimum length of 5. It also avoids several types of
# possible SHA-1 matches.
@@ -3278,6 +3282,7 @@ sub process {
my $herectx = $herecurr;
my $has_parens = 0;
my $has_quotes = 0;
+ my $backport = 0;

my $input = $line;
if ($line =~ /(?:\bcommit\s+[0-9a-f]{5,}|\bcommit\s*$)/i) {
@@ -3307,18 +3312,21 @@ sub process {
$long = 1 if ($input =~ /\bcommit\s+[0-9a-f]{41,}/i);
$space = 0 if ($input =~ /\bcommit [0-9a-f]/i);
$case = 0 if ($input =~ /\b[Cc]ommit\s+[0-9a-f]{5,40}[^A-F]/);
+ $backport = 1 if(($input =~ /\bcommit\s+[0-9a-f]{12,40}\supstream/i) ||
+ ($input =~ /\B\[\s[Uu]pstream\scommit\s+[0-9a-f]{5,}\s\]/));
} elsif ($input =~ /\b([0-9a-f]{12,40})\b/i) {
$orig_commit = lc($1);
}

($id, $description) = git_commit_info($orig_commit,
$id, $orig_desc);

if (defined($id) &&
($short || $long || $space || $case || ($orig_desc ne $description) || !$has_quotes) &&
- $last_git_commit_id_linenr != $linenr - 1) {
+ $last_git_commit_id_linenr != $linenr - 1
+ && !$backport) {
ERROR("GIT_COMMIT_ID",
- "Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> (\"<title line>\")' - ie: '${init_char}ommit $id (\"$description\")'\n" . $herectx);
+ "Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> (\"<title line>\")' - ie: '${init_char}ommit $id (\"$description\")'\nor check the backport commit description format\n" . $herectx);
}
#don't report the next line if this line ends in commit and the sha1 hash is the next line
$last_git_commit_id_linenr = $linenr if ($line =~ /\bcommit\s*$/i);
--
2.27.0


2022-12-05 13:21:32

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add the backport commit format check

On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 17:48 +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Xinghui Li <[email protected]>
>
> The backport commit has been used to be misreported as Error
> by checkpatch.pl like this:
>
> 'ERROR: Please use git commit description style
> 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie:......
> commit <sha1> upstream.
>
> total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 8 lines checked
> '
> So, add the backport commit format check to avoid the above mistake.

nak.

I don't believe this should be an accepted style.

and

> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> ERROR("GIT_COMMIT_ID",
> - "Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> (\"<title line>\")' - ie: '${init_char}ommit $id (\"$description\")'\n" . $herectx);
> + "Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> (\"<title line>\")' - ie: '${init_char}ommit $id (\"$description\")'\nor check the backport commit description format\n" . $herectx);

Output messages are only single line not multiple lines.

2022-12-05 13:23:29

by Xinghui Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add the backport commit format check

在 2022/12/5 20:46,“Joe Perches”<[email protected]> 写入:
> nak.
>
> I don't believe this should be an accepted style.

Sorry for my confusion between LTS and mainline.

Thanks for your reply.