2019-06-05 20:49:44

by Qian Cai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/eeh_cache: fix a W=1 kernel-doc warning

The opening comment mark "/**" is reserved for kernel-doc comments, so
it will generate a warning with "make W=1".

arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c:37: warning: cannot understand function
prototype: 'struct pci_io_addr_range

Since this is not a kernel-doc for the struct below, but rather an
overview of this source eeh_cache.c, just use the free-form comments
kernel-doc syntax instead.

Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
index 320472373122..05ffd32b3416 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@


/**
+ * DOC: Overview
+ *
* The pci address cache subsystem. This subsystem places
* PCI device address resources into a red-black tree, sorted
* according to the address range, so that given only an i/o
@@ -34,6 +36,7 @@
* than any hash algo I could think of for this problem, even
* with the penalty of slow pointer chases for d-cache misses).
*/
+
struct pci_io_addr_range {
struct rb_node rb_node;
resource_size_t addr_lo;
--
1.8.3.1


2019-06-27 19:57:00

by Qian Cai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/eeh_cache: fix a W=1 kernel-doc warning

Ping.

On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 16:46 -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> The opening comment mark "/**" is reserved for kernel-doc comments, so
> it will generate a warning with "make W=1".
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c:37: warning: cannot understand function
> prototype: 'struct pci_io_addr_range
>
> Since this is not a kernel-doc for the struct below, but rather an
> overview of this source eeh_cache.c, just use the free-form comments
> kernel-doc syntax instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
> index 320472373122..05ffd32b3416 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>  
>  
>  /**
> + * DOC: Overview
> + *
>   * The pci address cache subsystem.  This subsystem places
>   * PCI device address resources into a red-black tree, sorted
>   * according to the address range, so that given only an i/o
> @@ -34,6 +36,7 @@
>   * than any hash algo I could think of for this problem, even
>   * with the penalty of slow pointer chases for d-cache misses).
>   */
> +
>  struct pci_io_addr_range {
>   struct rb_node rb_node;
>   resource_size_t addr_lo;

2019-06-28 03:03:39

by Russell Currey

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/eeh_cache: fix a W=1 kernel-doc warning

On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 16:46 -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> The opening comment mark "/**" is reserved for kernel-doc comments,
> so
> it will generate a warning with "make W=1".
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c:37: warning: cannot understand
> function
> prototype: 'struct pci_io_addr_range
>
> Since this is not a kernel-doc for the struct below, but rather an
> overview of this source eeh_cache.c, just use the free-form comments
> kernel-doc syntax instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Russell Currey <[email protected]>

2019-07-03 14:28:40

by Michael Ellerman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/eeh_cache: fix a W=1 kernel-doc warning

On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 20:46:19 UTC, Qian Cai wrote:
> The opening comment mark "/**" is reserved for kernel-doc comments, so
> it will generate a warning with "make W=1".
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_cache.c:37: warning: cannot understand function
> prototype: 'struct pci_io_addr_range
>
> Since this is not a kernel-doc for the struct below, but rather an
> overview of this source eeh_cache.c, just use the free-form comments
> kernel-doc syntax instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Russell Currey <[email protected]>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3becd11dffe5d4a7467ebd841172f3e091fbcbd0

cheers