2021-04-02 13:21:18

by Nicholas Piggin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: reduce irqdebug bouncing cachelines

note_interrupt increments desc->irq_count for each interrupt even for
percpu interrupt handlers, even when they are handled successfully. This
causes cacheline bouncing and limits scalability.

Instead of incrementing irq_count every time, only start incrementing it
after seeing an unhandled irq, which should avoid the cache line
bouncing in the common path.

This actually should give better consistency in handling misbehaving
irqs too, because instead of the first unhandled irq arriving at an
arbitrary point in the irq_count cycle, its arrival will begin the
irq_count cycle.

Cédric reports the result of his IPI throughput test:

Millions of IPIs/s
----------- --------------------------------------
upstream upstream patched
chips cpus default noirqdebug default (irqdebug)
----------- -----------------------------------------
1 0-15 4.061 4.153 4.084
0-31 7.937 8.186 8.158
0-47 11.018 11.392 11.233
0-63 11.460 13.907 14.022
2 0-79 8.376 18.105 18.084
0-95 7.338 22.101 22.266
0-111 6.716 25.306 25.473
0-127 6.223 27.814 28.029

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
---
kernel/irq/spurious.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index f865e5f4d382..c481d8458325 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -403,6 +403,10 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
desc->irqs_unhandled -= ok;
}

+ if (likely(!desc->irqs_unhandled))
+ return;
+
+ /* Now getting into unhandled irq detection */
desc->irq_count++;
if (likely(desc->irq_count < 100000))
return;
--
2.23.0


Subject: [tip: irq/core] genirq: Reduce irqdebug cacheline bouncing

The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID: 7c07012eb1be8b4a95d3502fd30795849007a40e
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/7c07012eb1be8b4a95d3502fd30795849007a40e
Author: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 23:20:37 +10:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 13:35:54 +02:00

genirq: Reduce irqdebug cacheline bouncing

note_interrupt() increments desc->irq_count for each interrupt even for
percpu interrupt handlers, even when they are handled successfully. This
causes cacheline bouncing and limits scalability.

Instead of incrementing irq_count every time, only start incrementing it
after seeing an unhandled irq, which should avoid the cache line
bouncing in the common path.

This actually should give better consistency in handling misbehaving
irqs too, because instead of the first unhandled irq arriving at an
arbitrary point in the irq_count cycle, its arrival will begin the
irq_count cycle.

Cédric reports the result of his IPI throughput test:

Millions of IPIs/s
----------- --------------------------------------
upstream upstream patched
chips cpus default noirqdebug default (irqdebug)
----------- -----------------------------------------
1 0-15 4.061 4.153 4.084
0-31 7.937 8.186 8.158
0-47 11.018 11.392 11.233
0-63 11.460 13.907 14.022
2 0-79 8.376 18.105 18.084
0-95 7.338 22.101 22.266
0-111 6.716 25.306 25.473
0-127 6.223 27.814 28.029

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

---
kernel/irq/spurious.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index f865e5f..c481d84 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -403,6 +403,10 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
desc->irqs_unhandled -= ok;
}

+ if (likely(!desc->irqs_unhandled))
+ return;
+
+ /* Now getting into unhandled irq detection */
desc->irq_count++;
if (likely(desc->irq_count < 100000))
return;

2021-04-10 12:00:05

by Thomas Gleixner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: reduce irqdebug bouncing cachelines

Nicholas,

On Fri, Apr 02 2021 at 23:20, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> note_interrupt increments desc->irq_count for each interrupt even for
> percpu interrupt handlers, even when they are handled successfully. This
> causes cacheline bouncing and limits scalability.
>
> Instead of incrementing irq_count every time, only start incrementing it
> after seeing an unhandled irq, which should avoid the cache line
> bouncing in the common path.
>
> This actually should give better consistency in handling misbehaving
> irqs too, because instead of the first unhandled irq arriving at an
> arbitrary point in the irq_count cycle, its arrival will begin the
> irq_count cycle.

I've applied that because it makes sense in general, but I think the whole
call to note_interrupt() can be avoided or return early when interrupts
would be marked accordingly. For IPI handlers which always return
HANDLED the whole procedure is pretty pointless to begin with.

Something like the completely untested below.

Thanks,

tglx
---
include/linux/interrupt.h | 3 +++
include/linux/irq.h | 2 ++
kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 ++
kernel/irq/settings.h | 12 ++++++++++++
kernel/irq/spurious.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@
* IRQF_NO_AUTOEN - Don't enable IRQ or NMI automatically when users request it.
* Users will enable it explicitly by enable_irq() or enable_nmi()
* later.
+ * IRQF_NO_DEBUG - Exclude from runnaway detection for IPI and similar handlers,
+ * depends on IRQF_PERCPU.
*/
#define IRQF_SHARED 0x00000080
#define IRQF_PROBE_SHARED 0x00000100
@@ -78,6 +80,7 @@
#define IRQF_EARLY_RESUME 0x00020000
#define IRQF_COND_SUSPEND 0x00040000
#define IRQF_NO_AUTOEN 0x00080000
+#define IRQF_NO_DEBUG 0x00100000

#define IRQF_TIMER (__IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_NO_THREAD)

--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ enum irqchip_irq_state;
* mechanism and from core side polling.
* IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY - Disable lazy irq disable
* IRQ_HIDDEN - Don't show up in /proc/interrupts
+ * IRQ_NO_DEBUG - Exclude from note_interrupt() debugging
*/
enum {
IRQ_TYPE_NONE = 0x00000000,
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ enum {
IRQ_IS_POLLED = (1 << 18),
IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY = (1 << 19),
IRQ_HIDDEN = (1 << 20),
+ IRQ_NO_DEBUG = (1 << 21),
};

#define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK \
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1682,6 +1682,8 @@ static int
if (new->flags & IRQF_PERCPU) {
irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_PER_CPU);
irq_settings_set_per_cpu(desc);
+ if (new->flags & IRQF_NO_DEBUG)
+ irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
}

if (new->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT)
--- a/kernel/irq/settings.h
+++ b/kernel/irq/settings.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum {
_IRQ_IS_POLLED = IRQ_IS_POLLED,
_IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY = IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY,
_IRQ_HIDDEN = IRQ_HIDDEN,
+ _IRQ_NO_DEBUG = IRQ_NO_DEBUG,
_IRQF_MODIFY_MASK = IRQF_MODIFY_MASK,
};

@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ enum {
#define IRQ_IS_POLLED GOT_YOU_MORON
#define IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY GOT_YOU_MORON
#define IRQ_HIDDEN GOT_YOU_MORON
+#define IRQ_NO_DEBUG GOT_YOU_MORON
#undef IRQF_MODIFY_MASK
#define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK GOT_YOU_MORON

@@ -174,3 +176,13 @@ static inline bool irq_settings_is_hidde
{
return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_HIDDEN;
}
+
+static inline void irq_settings_set_no_debug(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ desc->status_use_accessors |= _IRQ_NO_DEBUG;
+}
+
+static inline bool irq_settings_no_debug(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_NO_DEBUG;
+}
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *des
unsigned int irq;

if (desc->istate & IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS ||
- irq_settings_is_polled(desc))
+ irq_settings_is_polled(desc) | irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
return;

if (bad_action_ret(action_ret)) {

2021-04-12 09:46:59

by Cédric Le Goater

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: reduce irqdebug bouncing cachelines

Hello,

On 4/10/21 1:58 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Nicholas,
>
> On Fri, Apr 02 2021 at 23:20, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> note_interrupt increments desc->irq_count for each interrupt even for
>> percpu interrupt handlers, even when they are handled successfully. This
>> causes cacheline bouncing and limits scalability.
>>
>> Instead of incrementing irq_count every time, only start incrementing it
>> after seeing an unhandled irq, which should avoid the cache line
>> bouncing in the common path.
>>
>> This actually should give better consistency in handling misbehaving
>> irqs too, because instead of the first unhandled irq arriving at an
>> arbitrary point in the irq_count cycle, its arrival will begin the
>> irq_count cycle.
>
> I've applied that because it makes sense in general, but I think the whole
> call to note_interrupt() can be avoided or return early when interrupts
> would be marked accordingly. For IPI handlers which always return
> HANDLED the whole procedure is pretty pointless to begin with.
>
> Something like the completely untested below.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> include/linux/interrupt.h | 3 +++
> include/linux/irq.h | 2 ++
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 ++
> kernel/irq/settings.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> kernel/irq/spurious.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@
> * IRQF_NO_AUTOEN - Don't enable IRQ or NMI automatically when users request it.
> * Users will enable it explicitly by enable_irq() or enable_nmi()
> * later.
> + * IRQF_NO_DEBUG - Exclude from runnaway detection for IPI and similar handlers,
> + * depends on IRQF_PERCPU.
> */
> #define IRQF_SHARED 0x00000080
> #define IRQF_PROBE_SHARED 0x00000100
> @@ -78,6 +80,7 @@
> #define IRQF_EARLY_RESUME 0x00020000
> #define IRQF_COND_SUSPEND 0x00040000
> #define IRQF_NO_AUTOEN 0x00080000
> +#define IRQF_NO_DEBUG 0x00100000
>
> #define IRQF_TIMER (__IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_NO_THREAD)
>
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ enum irqchip_irq_state;
> * mechanism and from core side polling.
> * IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY - Disable lazy irq disable
> * IRQ_HIDDEN - Don't show up in /proc/interrupts
> + * IRQ_NO_DEBUG - Exclude from note_interrupt() debugging
> */
> enum {
> IRQ_TYPE_NONE = 0x00000000,
> @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ enum {
> IRQ_IS_POLLED = (1 << 18),
> IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY = (1 << 19),
> IRQ_HIDDEN = (1 << 20),
> + IRQ_NO_DEBUG = (1 << 21),
> };
>
> #define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK \
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -1682,6 +1682,8 @@ static int
> if (new->flags & IRQF_PERCPU) {
> irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_PER_CPU);
> irq_settings_set_per_cpu(desc);
> + if (new->flags & IRQF_NO_DEBUG)
> + irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
> }
>
> if (new->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT)
> --- a/kernel/irq/settings.h
> +++ b/kernel/irq/settings.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum {
> _IRQ_IS_POLLED = IRQ_IS_POLLED,
> _IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY = IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY,
> _IRQ_HIDDEN = IRQ_HIDDEN,
> + _IRQ_NO_DEBUG = IRQ_NO_DEBUG,
> _IRQF_MODIFY_MASK = IRQF_MODIFY_MASK,
> };
>
> @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ enum {
> #define IRQ_IS_POLLED GOT_YOU_MORON
> #define IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY GOT_YOU_MORON
> #define IRQ_HIDDEN GOT_YOU_MORON
> +#define IRQ_NO_DEBUG GOT_YOU_MORON
> #undef IRQF_MODIFY_MASK
> #define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK GOT_YOU_MORON
>
> @@ -174,3 +176,13 @@ static inline bool irq_settings_is_hidde
> {
> return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_HIDDEN;
> }
> +
> +static inline void irq_settings_set_no_debug(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + desc->status_use_accessors |= _IRQ_NO_DEBUG;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool irq_settings_no_debug(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_NO_DEBUG;
> +}
> --- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *des
> unsigned int irq;
>
> if (desc->istate & IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS ||
> - irq_settings_is_polled(desc))
> + irq_settings_is_polled(desc) | irq_settings_no_debug(desc))

Shouldn't it be '||' instead ?

> return;
>
> if (bad_action_ret(action_ret)) {
>

We could test irq_settings_no_debug() directly under handle_nested_irq()
and handle_irq_event_percpu() to avoid calling note_interrupt(), just
like we do for noirqdebug.

Thanks,

C.

2021-04-12 12:47:33

by Thomas Gleixner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: reduce irqdebug bouncing cachelines

Cédric,

On Mon, Apr 12 2021 at 11:06, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 4/10/21 1:58 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> --- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *des
>> unsigned int irq;
>>
>> if (desc->istate & IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS ||
>> - irq_settings_is_polled(desc))
>> + irq_settings_is_polled(desc) | irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
>
> Shouldn't it be '||' instead ?

It could. But that's intentionally '|'. Why?

Because that lets the compiler merge the bit checks into one and
therefore spares one conditional branch.

>> return;
>>
>> if (bad_action_ret(action_ret)) {
>>
>
> We could test irq_settings_no_debug() directly under handle_nested_irq()
> and handle_irq_event_percpu() to avoid calling note_interrupt(), just
> like we do for noirqdebug.

We can do that, but then we should not just make it:

if (!irqnodebug && !irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
note_interrupt(...);

Instead have only one condition:

if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
note_interrupt(...);

See the uncompiled delta patch below.

Thanks,

tglx
---
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1690,6 +1690,9 @@ static int
irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
}

+ if (noirqdebug)
+ irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
+
if (new->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT)
desc->istate |= IRQS_ONESHOT;

--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *des
unsigned int irq;

if (desc->istate & IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS ||
- irq_settings_is_polled(desc) | irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
+ irq_settings_is_polled(desc))
return;

if (bad_action_ret(action_ret)) {
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
for_each_action_of_desc(desc, action)
action_ret |= action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);

- if (!noirqdebug)
+ if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
note_interrupt(desc, action_ret);

raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_percpu(stru

add_interrupt_randomness(desc->irq_data.irq, flags);

- if (!noirqdebug)
+ if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
note_interrupt(desc, retval);
return retval;
}

2021-04-13 17:51:22

by Cédric Le Goater

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: reduce irqdebug bouncing cachelines

Thomas,

>> We could test irq_settings_no_debug() directly under handle_nested_irq()
>> and handle_irq_event_percpu() to avoid calling note_interrupt(), just
>> like we do for noirqdebug.
>
> We can do that, but then we should not just make it:
>
> if (!irqnodebug && !irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
> note_interrupt(...);
>
> Instead have only one condition:
>
> if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
> note_interrupt(...);
>
> See the uncompiled delta patch below.

I merged this second part with the first and gave IRQF_NO_DEBUG a try
on P8 and P9 systems and all looked fine. I should send both patches
after IRQF_NO_AUTOEN is merged in mainline.

Thanks,

C.

2021-04-14 00:18:07

by Thomas Gleixner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: reduce irqdebug bouncing cachelines

On Tue, Apr 13 2021 at 14:16, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> We could test irq_settings_no_debug() directly under handle_nested_irq()
>>> and handle_irq_event_percpu() to avoid calling note_interrupt(), just
>>> like we do for noirqdebug.
>>
>> We can do that, but then we should not just make it:
>>
>> if (!irqnodebug && !irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
>> note_interrupt(...);
>>
>> Instead have only one condition:
>>
>> if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
>> note_interrupt(...);
>>
>> See the uncompiled delta patch below.
>
> I merged this second part with the first and gave IRQF_NO_DEBUG a try
> on P8 and P9 systems and all looked fine. I should send both patches
> after IRQF_NO_AUTOEN is merged in mainline.

Does having that NODEBUG flag set on the IPI irqs make a measurable
difference or is it just too small to matter?

Thanks,

tglx




2021-04-15 00:25:55

by Cédric Le Goater

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: reduce irqdebug bouncing cachelines

On 4/13/21 10:24 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13 2021 at 14:16, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>> We could test irq_settings_no_debug() directly under handle_nested_irq()
>>>> and handle_irq_event_percpu() to avoid calling note_interrupt(), just
>>>> like we do for noirqdebug.
>>>
>>> We can do that, but then we should not just make it:
>>>
>>> if (!irqnodebug && !irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
>>> note_interrupt(...);
>>>
>>> Instead have only one condition:
>>>
>>> if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
>>> note_interrupt(...);
>>>
>>> See the uncompiled delta patch below.
>>
>> I merged this second part with the first and gave IRQF_NO_DEBUG a try
>> on P8 and P9 systems and all looked fine. I should send both patches
>> after IRQF_NO_AUTOEN is merged in mainline.
>
> Does having that NODEBUG flag set on the IPI irqs make a measurable
> difference or is it just too small to matter?

It does not add much benefits on the 2s and 4s systems but I will give it
a try on bigger ones when I can grab them. Then we can decide if it is
worth merging.

Thanks,

C.

2021-05-16 07:33:24

by Cédric Le Goater

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: reduce irqdebug bouncing cachelines

On 4/13/21 10:24 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13 2021 at 14:16, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>> We could test irq_settings_no_debug() directly under handle_nested_irq()
>>>> and handle_irq_event_percpu() to avoid calling note_interrupt(), just
>>>> like we do for noirqdebug.
>>>
>>> We can do that, but then we should not just make it:
>>>
>>> if (!irqnodebug && !irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
>>> note_interrupt(...);
>>>
>>> Instead have only one condition:
>>>
>>> if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
>>> note_interrupt(...);
>>>
>>> See the uncompiled delta patch below.
>>
>> I merged this second part with the first and gave IRQF_NO_DEBUG a try
>> on P8 and P9 systems and all looked fine. I should send both patches
>> after IRQF_NO_AUTOEN is merged in mainline.
>
> Does having that NODEBUG flag set on the IPI irqs make a measurable
> difference or is it just too small to matter?

Here are some ipistorm results on a P10 system with 12 activated chips,
each with ~120 HW threads. The kernel is a 5.12 plus extras :

- XIVE IPI IRQ domain patchset (merged in 5.13-rc1)
- MSI IRQ domain pachset (should not have any impact)
- your IRQF_NO_DEBUG patch.

There is some slight improvement on the first 4 chips but it gets
better when we reach the fifth which requires an extra hop on the
bus. On 12 chips, we are close to an extra 9%.

Given these results, I think it would good to have the IRQF_NO_DEBUG
flag.

Thanks,

C.

[*] https://github.com/antonblanchard/ipistorm


Mint/s

chips cpus IRQF_NO_DEBUG
---------------------------------------
0 15 4.32 4.32
31 8.63 8.65
47 12.86 12.89
63 17.11 17.16
79 21.29 21.40
95 25.45 25.67
111 29.61 29.80
1 127 33.53 33.64
143 37.55 37.77
159 41.50 41.78
175 45.42 45.63
191 49.39 49.51
207 53.27 53.61
223 57.17 57.73
239 61.05 61.59
2 255 64.94 65.69
271 65.20 62.62
287 62.20 65.18
303 63.96 67.69
319 65.74 69.95
335 67.45 71.84
351 69.63 72.75
3 367 70.96 74.38
383 72.34 75.62
399 74.26 77.69
415 76.49 79.78
431 78.46 81.67
447 79.87 82.50
463 82.07 85.13
479 83.95 87.03
4 495 87.67 92.94
511 93.70 98.74
527 95.43 101.45
543 97.39 103.39
559 98.95 104.76
575 100.08 105.70
591 101.26 107.06
607 102.17 108.16
5 623 103.27 109.44
639 104.95 111.14
655 106.59 112.36
671 107.92 113.72
687 108.75 115.25
703 109.84 117.06
719 110.99 118.45
6 735 112.30 119.07
751 114.19 120.72
767 115.59 122.70
783 116.69 124.80
799 118.62 126.38
815 120.38 128.36
831 120.78 129.15
847 122.69 130.44
7 863 123.65 132.44
879 124.78 133.83
895 126.58 135.43
911 128.02 136.85
927 130.48 138.98
943 130.98 140.58
959 132.17 141.74
8 975 134.55 142.62
991 134.89 143.82
1007 135.64 145.51
1023 137.23 147.22
1039 139.37 149.85
1055 141.80 150.27
1071 141.37 152.33
1087 143.08 153.20
9 1103 144.83 154.23
1119 144.55 155.96
1135 147.32 157.91
1151 148.31 159.04
1167 150.67 160.41
1183 149.44 161.82
1199 152.53 164.69
1215 153.51 165.31
10 1231 154.88 166.67
1247 156.06 168.40
1263 157.59 170.01
1279 158.74 172.10
1295 159.55 172.79
1311 160.74 173.62
1327 161.86 175.02
11 1343 163.75 175.95
1359 163.67 177.96
1375 164.95 178.94
1391 166.53 180.09
1407 167.17 181.25
1423 168.84 183.94
1439 170.20 183.96
1455 170.47 185.47


From 130eb33a02eb9d98fd8d8148e420b7b7b243bb93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 08:23:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Add a IRQF_NO_DEBUG flag
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The whole call to note_interrupt() can be avoided or return early when
interrupts would be marked accordingly. For IPI handlers which always
return HANDLED the whole procedure is pretty pointless to begin with.

Add a IRQF_NO_DEBUG flag.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/interrupt.h | 3 +++
include/linux/irq.h | 2 ++
kernel/irq/settings.h | 12 ++++++++++++
kernel/irq/chip.c | 2 +-
kernel/irq/handle.c | 2 +-
kernel/irq/manage.c | 5 +++++
6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 4777850a6dc7..a52109c3f3a4 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@
* IRQF_NO_AUTOEN - Don't enable IRQ or NMI automatically when users request it.
* Users will enable it explicitly by enable_irq() or enable_nmi()
* later.
+ * IRQF_NO_DEBUG - Exclude from runnaway detection for IPI and similar handlers,
+ * depends on IRQF_PERCPU.
*/
#define IRQF_SHARED 0x00000080
#define IRQF_PROBE_SHARED 0x00000100
@@ -78,6 +80,7 @@
#define IRQF_EARLY_RESUME 0x00020000
#define IRQF_COND_SUSPEND 0x00040000
#define IRQF_NO_AUTOEN 0x00080000
+#define IRQF_NO_DEBUG 0x00100000

#define IRQF_TIMER (__IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_NO_THREAD)

diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index 31b347c9f8dd..8e9a9ae471a6 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ enum irqchip_irq_state;
* mechanism and from core side polling.
* IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY - Disable lazy irq disable
* IRQ_HIDDEN - Don't show up in /proc/interrupts
+ * IRQ_NO_DEBUG - Exclude from note_interrupt() debugging
*/
enum {
IRQ_TYPE_NONE = 0x00000000,
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ enum {
IRQ_IS_POLLED = (1 << 18),
IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY = (1 << 19),
IRQ_HIDDEN = (1 << 20),
+ IRQ_NO_DEBUG = (1 << 21),
};

#define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK \
diff --git a/kernel/irq/settings.h b/kernel/irq/settings.h
index 403378b9947b..7b7efb1a114b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/settings.h
+++ b/kernel/irq/settings.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum {
_IRQ_IS_POLLED = IRQ_IS_POLLED,
_IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY = IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY,
_IRQ_HIDDEN = IRQ_HIDDEN,
+ _IRQ_NO_DEBUG = IRQ_NO_DEBUG,
_IRQF_MODIFY_MASK = IRQF_MODIFY_MASK,
};

@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ enum {
#define IRQ_IS_POLLED GOT_YOU_MORON
#define IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY GOT_YOU_MORON
#define IRQ_HIDDEN GOT_YOU_MORON
+#define IRQ_NO_DEBUG GOT_YOU_MORON
#undef IRQF_MODIFY_MASK
#define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK GOT_YOU_MORON

@@ -174,3 +176,13 @@ static inline bool irq_settings_is_hidden(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_HIDDEN;
}
+
+static inline void irq_settings_set_no_debug(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ desc->status_use_accessors |= _IRQ_NO_DEBUG;
+}
+
+static inline bool irq_settings_no_debug(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_NO_DEBUG;
+}
diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index 8cc8e5713287..7f04c7d8296e 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
for_each_action_of_desc(desc, action)
action_ret |= action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);

- if (!noirqdebug)
+ if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
note_interrupt(desc, action_ret);

raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 762a928e18f9..221d80c31e94 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc)

add_interrupt_randomness(desc->irq_data.irq, flags);

- if (!noirqdebug)
+ if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
note_interrupt(desc, retval);
return retval;
}
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 4c14356543d9..7bdd09e7d5f0 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1686,8 +1686,13 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
if (new->flags & IRQF_PERCPU) {
irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_PER_CPU);
irq_settings_set_per_cpu(desc);
+ if (new->flags & IRQF_NO_DEBUG)
+ irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
}

+ if (noirqdebug)
+ irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
+
if (new->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT)
desc->istate |= IRQS_ONESHOT;

--
2.31.1

Subject: [tip: irq/core] genirq: Add a IRQF_NO_DEBUG flag

The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID: c2b1063e8feb2115537addce10f36c0c82d11d9b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c2b1063e8feb2115537addce10f36c0c82d11d9b
Author: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 08:23:25 +02:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Mon, 17 May 2021 20:01:35 +02:00

genirq: Add a IRQF_NO_DEBUG flag

The whole call to note_interrupt() can be avoided or return early when
interrupts would be marked accordingly. For IPI handlers which always
return HANDLED the whole procedure is pretty pointless to begin with.

Add a IRQF_NO_DEBUG flag and mark the interrupt accordingly if supplied
when the interrupt is requested.

When noirqdebug is set on the kernel commandline, then the interrupt is
marked unconditionally so that there is only one condition in the hotpath
to evaluate.

[ clg: Add changelog ]

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
include/linux/interrupt.h | 3 +++
include/linux/irq.h | 2 ++
kernel/irq/chip.c | 2 +-
kernel/irq/handle.c | 2 +-
kernel/irq/manage.c | 5 +++++
kernel/irq/settings.h | 12 ++++++++++++
6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 4777850..a52109c 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@
* IRQF_NO_AUTOEN - Don't enable IRQ or NMI automatically when users request it.
* Users will enable it explicitly by enable_irq() or enable_nmi()
* later.
+ * IRQF_NO_DEBUG - Exclude from runnaway detection for IPI and similar handlers,
+ * depends on IRQF_PERCPU.
*/
#define IRQF_SHARED 0x00000080
#define IRQF_PROBE_SHARED 0x00000100
@@ -78,6 +80,7 @@
#define IRQF_EARLY_RESUME 0x00020000
#define IRQF_COND_SUSPEND 0x00040000
#define IRQF_NO_AUTOEN 0x00080000
+#define IRQF_NO_DEBUG 0x00100000

#define IRQF_TIMER (__IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_NO_THREAD)

diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index 31b347c..8e9a9ae 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ enum irqchip_irq_state;
* mechanism and from core side polling.
* IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY - Disable lazy irq disable
* IRQ_HIDDEN - Don't show up in /proc/interrupts
+ * IRQ_NO_DEBUG - Exclude from note_interrupt() debugging
*/
enum {
IRQ_TYPE_NONE = 0x00000000,
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ enum {
IRQ_IS_POLLED = (1 << 18),
IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY = (1 << 19),
IRQ_HIDDEN = (1 << 20),
+ IRQ_NO_DEBUG = (1 << 21),
};

#define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK \
diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index 8cc8e57..7f04c7d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
for_each_action_of_desc(desc, action)
action_ret |= action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);

- if (!noirqdebug)
+ if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
note_interrupt(desc, action_ret);

raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 762a928..221d80c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc)

add_interrupt_randomness(desc->irq_data.irq, flags);

- if (!noirqdebug)
+ if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
note_interrupt(desc, retval);
return retval;
}
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 4c14356..7bdd09e 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1686,8 +1686,13 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
if (new->flags & IRQF_PERCPU) {
irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_PER_CPU);
irq_settings_set_per_cpu(desc);
+ if (new->flags & IRQF_NO_DEBUG)
+ irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
}

+ if (noirqdebug)
+ irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
+
if (new->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT)
desc->istate |= IRQS_ONESHOT;

diff --git a/kernel/irq/settings.h b/kernel/irq/settings.h
index 403378b..7b7efb1 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/settings.h
+++ b/kernel/irq/settings.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum {
_IRQ_IS_POLLED = IRQ_IS_POLLED,
_IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY = IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY,
_IRQ_HIDDEN = IRQ_HIDDEN,
+ _IRQ_NO_DEBUG = IRQ_NO_DEBUG,
_IRQF_MODIFY_MASK = IRQF_MODIFY_MASK,
};

@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ enum {
#define IRQ_IS_POLLED GOT_YOU_MORON
#define IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY GOT_YOU_MORON
#define IRQ_HIDDEN GOT_YOU_MORON
+#define IRQ_NO_DEBUG GOT_YOU_MORON
#undef IRQF_MODIFY_MASK
#define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK GOT_YOU_MORON

@@ -174,3 +176,13 @@ static inline bool irq_settings_is_hidden(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_HIDDEN;
}
+
+static inline void irq_settings_set_no_debug(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ desc->status_use_accessors |= _IRQ_NO_DEBUG;
+}
+
+static inline bool irq_settings_no_debug(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_NO_DEBUG;
+}