2020-04-22 14:13:22

by Christian Marangi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: qcom: fix compatibility issue with old binding

Binding has changed from operating-points-v2-kryo-cpu to
operating-points-v2-qcom-cpu. Also check for old binding in driver
probe.

Fixes: a8811ec764f9 cpufreq: qcom: Add support for krait based socs
Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
index a1b8238872a2..8a0411efc79a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
@@ -278,6 +278,10 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOENT;

ret = of_device_is_compatible(np, "operating-points-v2-qcom-cpu");
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = of_device_is_compatible(np,
+ "operating-points-v2-kyro-cpu");
+
if (!ret) {
of_node_put(np);
return -ENOENT;
--
2.25.1


2020-04-22 15:27:46

by Georgi Djakov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: qcom: fix compatibility issue with old binding

Hi Ansuel,

On 4/22/20 17:08, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> Binding has changed from operating-points-v2-kryo-cpu to
> operating-points-v2-qcom-cpu. Also check for old binding in driver
> probe.
>
> Fixes: a8811ec764f9 cpufreq: qcom: Add support for krait based socs

The correct format is: Fixes: %h (\"%s\")

> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> index a1b8238872a2..8a0411efc79a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> @@ -278,6 +278,10 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> ret = of_device_is_compatible(np, "operating-points-v2-qcom-cpu");
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = of_device_is_compatible(np,
> + "operating-points-v2-kyro-cpu");

There is a typo in the compatible string.

Thanks,
Georgi

> +
> if (!ret) {
> of_node_put(np);
> return -ENOENT;
>