On 2024/5/6 22:17, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> We make sure b_frozen_data is not NULL before jump to "repeat" tag, move
> "repeat" tag around to remove repeat check of b_frozen_data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index 9a35d0c5b38c..77fcdc76fdfd 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -353,12 +353,12 @@ int jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer(transaction_t *transaction,
> atomic_set(&new_bh->b_count, 1);
>
> spin_lock(&jh_in->b_state_lock);
> -repeat:
> /*
> * If a new transaction has already done a buffer copy-out, then
> * we use that version of the data for the commit.
> */
> if (jh_in->b_frozen_data) {
> +repeat:
> done_copy_out = 1;
> new_folio = virt_to_folio(jh_in->b_frozen_data);
> new_offset = offset_in_folio(new_folio, jh_in->b_frozen_data);
>
I suppose we could drop the repeat tag entirely, just set the new_folio and
new_offset, and then goto handle do_escape. We don't need to call
jbd2_buffer_frozen_trigger() and check for escaping again, is that right?
Thanks,
Yi.