2020-09-14 06:10:58

by Moshe Shemesh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

Add devlink reload action to allow the user to request a specific reload
action. The action parameter is optional, if not specified then devlink
driver re-init action is used (backward compatible).
Note that when required to do firmware activation some drivers may need
to reload the driver. On the other hand some drivers may need to reset
the firmware to reinitialize the driver entities. Therefore, the devlink
reload command returns the actions which were actually performed.
Reload actions supported are:
driver_reinit: driver entities re-initialization, applying devlink-param
and devlink-resource values.
fw_activate: firmware activate.

command examples:
$devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action driver_reinit
reload_actions_performed:
driver_reinit

$devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action fw_activate
reload_actions_performed:
driver_reinit fw_activate

Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]>
---
v3 -> v4:
- Removed fw_activate_no_reset as an action (next patch adds limit
levels instead).
- Renamed actions_done to actions_performed
v2 -> v3:
- Replace fw_live_patch action by fw_activate_no_reset
- Devlink reload returns the actions done over netlink reply
v1 -> v2:
- Instead of reload levels driver,fw_reset,fw_live_patch have reload
actions driver_reinit,fw_activate,fw_live_patch
- Remove driver default level, the action driver_reinit is the default
action for all drivers
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 14 ++-
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 15 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c | 25 ++--
drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c | 16 ++-
include/net/devlink.h | 7 +-
include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 19 +++
net/core/devlink.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++-
7 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
index 70cf24ba71e4..aadf1676a0ed 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
@@ -3946,6 +3946,7 @@ static int mlx4_restart_one_up(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool reload,
struct devlink *devlink);

static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
+ enum devlink_reload_action action,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
@@ -3962,8 +3963,8 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
return 0;
}

-static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
{
struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
struct mlx4_dev *dev = &priv->dev;
@@ -3971,15 +3972,20 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
int err;

err = mlx4_restart_one_up(persist->pdev, true, devlink);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
mlx4_err(persist->dev, "mlx4_restart_one_up failed, ret=%d\n",
err);
+ return err;
+ }
+ if (actions_performed)
+ *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT);

- return err;
+ return 0;
}

static const struct devlink_ops mlx4_devlink_ops = {
.port_type_set = mlx4_devlink_port_type_set,
+ .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT),
.reload_down = mlx4_devlink_reload_down,
.reload_up = mlx4_devlink_reload_up,
};
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
index c709e9a385f6..9cd6b6c884e3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ mlx5_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_info_req *req,
}

static int mlx5_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
+ enum devlink_reload_action action,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
@@ -97,12 +98,19 @@ static int mlx5_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
return 0;
}

-static int mlx5_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+static int mlx5_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
{
struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
+ int err;

- return mlx5_load_one(dev, false);
+ err = mlx5_load_one(dev, false);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ if (actions_performed)
+ *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT);
+
+ return 0;
}

static const struct devlink_ops mlx5_devlink_ops = {
@@ -118,6 +126,7 @@ static const struct devlink_ops mlx5_devlink_ops = {
#endif
.flash_update = mlx5_devlink_flash_update,
.info_get = mlx5_devlink_info_get,
+ .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT),
.reload_down = mlx5_devlink_reload_down,
.reload_up = mlx5_devlink_reload_up,
};
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
index ec45a03140d7..c0a32f685b85 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ mlxsw_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_info_req *req,

static int
mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink,
- bool netns_change,
+ bool netns_change, enum devlink_reload_action action,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = devlink_priv(devlink);
@@ -1126,15 +1126,24 @@ mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink,
}

static int
-mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ unsigned long *actions_performed)
{
struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = devlink_priv(devlink);
+ int err;

- return mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(mlxsw_core->bus_info,
- mlxsw_core->bus,
- mlxsw_core->bus_priv, true,
- devlink, extack);
+ err = mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(mlxsw_core->bus_info,
+ mlxsw_core->bus,
+ mlxsw_core->bus_priv, true,
+ devlink, extack);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ if (actions_performed)
+ *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT) |
+ BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE);
+
+ return 0;
}

static int mlxsw_devlink_flash_update(struct devlink *devlink,
@@ -1268,6 +1277,8 @@ mlxsw_devlink_trap_policer_counter_get(struct devlink *devlink,
}

static const struct devlink_ops mlxsw_devlink_ops = {
+ .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT) |
+ BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE),
.reload_down = mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down,
.reload_up = mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up,
.port_type_set = mlxsw_devlink_port_type_set,
diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
index 32f339fedb21..f0919fa0cd8b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static int nsim_dev_reload_create(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev,
static void nsim_dev_reload_destroy(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev);

static int nsim_dev_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+ enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev = devlink_priv(devlink);

@@ -713,10 +713,11 @@ static int nsim_dev_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
return 0;
}

-static int nsim_dev_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+static int nsim_dev_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
{
struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
+ int err;

if (nsim_dev->fail_reload) {
/* For testing purposes, user set debugfs fail_reload
@@ -726,7 +727,13 @@ static int nsim_dev_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
return -EINVAL;
}

- return nsim_dev_reload_create(nsim_dev, extack);
+ err = nsim_dev_reload_create(nsim_dev, extack);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ if (actions_performed)
+ *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT);
+
+ return 0;
}

static int nsim_dev_info_get(struct devlink *devlink,
@@ -875,6 +882,7 @@ nsim_dev_devlink_trap_policer_counter_get(struct devlink *devlink,
}

static const struct devlink_ops nsim_dev_devlink_ops = {
+ .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT),
.reload_down = nsim_dev_reload_down,
.reload_up = nsim_dev_reload_up,
.info_get = nsim_dev_info_get,
diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
index eaec0a8cc5ef..b09db891db04 100644
--- a/include/net/devlink.h
+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
@@ -1011,10 +1011,11 @@ enum devlink_trap_group_generic_id {
}

struct devlink_ops {
+ unsigned long supported_reload_actions;
int (*reload_down)(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
- int (*reload_up)(struct devlink *devlink,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+ enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+ int (*reload_up)(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed);
int (*port_type_set)(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
enum devlink_port_type port_type);
int (*port_split)(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int port_index,
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
index 40d35145c879..a6f64db0bdf3 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
@@ -272,6 +272,21 @@ enum {
DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_METADATA_TYPE_FA_COOKIE,
};

+/**
+ * enum devlink_reload_action - Reload action.
+ * @DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT: Driver entities re-instantiation.
+ * @DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE: FW activate.
+ */
+enum devlink_reload_action {
+ DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC,
+ DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT,
+ DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE,
+
+ /* Add new reload actions above */
+ __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX,
+ DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX = __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX - 1
+};
+
enum devlink_attr {
/* don't change the order or add anything between, this is ABI! */
DEVLINK_ATTR_UNSPEC,
@@ -460,6 +475,10 @@ enum devlink_attr {

DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_EXTERNAL, /* u8 */
DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_CONTROLLER_NUMBER, /* u32 */
+
+ DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, /* u8 */
+ DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED, /* nested */
+
/* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */

__DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX,
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index 19037f114307..f4be1e1bf864 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -462,6 +462,12 @@ static int devlink_nl_put_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink)
return 0;
}

+static bool
+devlink_reload_action_is_supported(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action)
+{
+ return test_bit(action, &devlink->ops->supported_reload_actions);
+}
+
static int devlink_nl_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
u32 seq, int flags)
@@ -2969,29 +2975,72 @@ bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_is_reload_failed);

static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+ enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ unsigned long *actions_performed)
{
int err;

if (!devlink->reload_enabled)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;

- err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, extack);
+ err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, action, extack);
if (err)
return err;

if (dest_net && !net_eq(dest_net, devlink_net(devlink)))
devlink_reload_netns_change(devlink, dest_net);

- err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, extack);
+ err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, extack, actions_performed);
devlink_reload_failed_set(devlink, !!err);
return err;
}

+static int
+devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
+ struct devlink *devlink,
+ unsigned long actions_performed,
+ enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
+ u32 seq, int flags)
+{
+ struct nlattr *actions_performed_attr;
+ void *hdr;
+ int i;
+
+ hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, portid, seq, &devlink_nl_family, flags, cmd);
+ if (!hdr)
+ return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+ if (devlink_nl_put_handle(msg, devlink))
+ goto genlmsg_cancel;
+
+ actions_performed_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED);
+ if (!actions_performed_attr)
+ goto genlmsg_cancel;
+
+ for (i = 0; i <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX; i++) {
+ if (!test_bit(i, &actions_performed))
+ continue;
+ if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, i))
+ goto actions_performed_nest_cancel;
+ }
+ nla_nest_end(msg, actions_performed_attr);
+ genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
+ return 0;
+
+actions_performed_nest_cancel:
+ nla_nest_cancel(msg, actions_performed_attr);
+genlmsg_cancel:
+ genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
+ return -EMSGSIZE;
+}
+
static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
+ enum devlink_reload_action action;
+ unsigned long actions_performed;
struct net *dest_net = NULL;
+ struct sk_buff *msg;
int err;

if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))
@@ -3011,12 +3060,41 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
return PTR_ERR(dest_net);
}

- err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, info->extack);
+ if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION])
+ action = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION]);
+ else
+ action = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT;
+
+ if (action == DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC || action > DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Invalid reload action");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (!devlink_reload_action_is_supported(devlink, action)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Requested reload action is not supported");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, action, info->extack, &actions_performed);

if (dest_net)
put_net(dest_net);

- return err;
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ WARN_ON(!actions_performed);
+ msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!msg)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ err = devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(msg, devlink, actions_performed,
+ DEVLINK_CMD_RELOAD, info->snd_portid,
+ info->snd_seq, 0);
+ if (err) {
+ nlmsg_free(msg);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
}

static int devlink_nl_flash_update_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
@@ -7047,6 +7125,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
[DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_RATE] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
[DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_BURST] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FUNCTION] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
+ [DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
};

static const struct genl_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
@@ -7372,6 +7451,20 @@ static struct genl_family devlink_nl_family __ro_after_init = {
.n_mcgrps = ARRAY_SIZE(devlink_nl_mcgrps),
};

+static int devlink_reload_actions_verify(struct devlink *devlink)
+{
+ const struct devlink_ops *ops;
+
+ if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))
+ return 0;
+
+ ops = devlink->ops;
+ if (WARN_ON(ops->supported_reload_actions >= BIT(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) ||
+ ops->supported_reload_actions <= BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* devlink_alloc - Allocate new devlink instance resources
*
@@ -7392,6 +7485,11 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops *ops, size_t priv_size)
if (!devlink)
return NULL;
devlink->ops = ops;
+ if (devlink_reload_actions_verify(devlink)) {
+ kfree(devlink);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
xa_init_flags(&devlink->snapshot_ids, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
__devlink_net_set(devlink, &init_net);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink->port_list);
@@ -9657,7 +9755,8 @@ static void __net_exit devlink_pernet_pre_exit(struct net *net)
if (net_eq(devlink_net(devlink), net)) {
if (WARN_ON(!devlink_reload_supported(devlink)))
continue;
- err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net, NULL);
+ err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net,
+ DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT, NULL, NULL);
if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
pr_warn("Failed to reload devlink instance into init_net\n");
}
--
2.17.1


2020-09-14 07:10:44

by Vasundhara Volam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:39 AM Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Add devlink reload action to allow the user to request a specific reload
> action. The action parameter is optional, if not specified then devlink
> driver re-init action is used (backward compatible).
> Note that when required to do firmware activation some drivers may need
> to reload the driver. On the other hand some drivers may need to reset
> the firmware to reinitialize the driver entities. Therefore, the devlink
> reload command returns the actions which were actually performed.
> Reload actions supported are:
> driver_reinit: driver entities re-initialization, applying devlink-param
> and devlink-resource values.
> fw_activate: firmware activate.
>
> command examples:
> $devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action driver_reinit
> reload_actions_performed:
> driver_reinit
>
> $devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action fw_activate
> reload_actions_performed:
> driver_reinit fw_activate
>
> Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3 -> v4:
> - Removed fw_activate_no_reset as an action (next patch adds limit
> levels instead).
> - Renamed actions_done to actions_performed
> v2 -> v3:
> - Replace fw_live_patch action by fw_activate_no_reset
> - Devlink reload returns the actions done over netlink reply
> v1 -> v2:
> - Instead of reload levels driver,fw_reset,fw_live_patch have reload
> actions driver_reinit,fw_activate,fw_live_patch
> - Remove driver default level, the action driver_reinit is the default
> action for all drivers
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 14 ++-
> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 15 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c | 25 ++--
> drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c | 16 ++-
> include/net/devlink.h | 7 +-
> include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 19 +++
> net/core/devlink.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++-
> 7 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
> index 70cf24ba71e4..aadf1676a0ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
> @@ -3946,6 +3946,7 @@ static int mlx4_restart_one_up(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool reload,
> struct devlink *devlink);
>
> static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> + enum devlink_reload_action action,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
> @@ -3962,8 +3963,8 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
> {
> struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
> struct mlx4_dev *dev = &priv->dev;
> @@ -3971,15 +3972,20 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
> int err;
>
> err = mlx4_restart_one_up(persist->pdev, true, devlink);
> - if (err)
> + if (err) {
> mlx4_err(persist->dev, "mlx4_restart_one_up failed, ret=%d\n",
> err);
> + return err;
> + }
> + if (actions_performed)
> + *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT);
>
> - return err;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static const struct devlink_ops mlx4_devlink_ops = {
> .port_type_set = mlx4_devlink_port_type_set,
> + .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT),
> .reload_down = mlx4_devlink_reload_down,
> .reload_up = mlx4_devlink_reload_up,
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
> index c709e9a385f6..9cd6b6c884e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ mlx5_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_info_req *req,
> }
>
> static int mlx5_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> + enum devlink_reload_action action,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
> @@ -97,12 +98,19 @@ static int mlx5_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int mlx5_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +static int mlx5_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
> {
> struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
> + int err;
>
> - return mlx5_load_one(dev, false);
> + err = mlx5_load_one(dev, false);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + if (actions_performed)
> + *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static const struct devlink_ops mlx5_devlink_ops = {
> @@ -118,6 +126,7 @@ static const struct devlink_ops mlx5_devlink_ops = {
> #endif
> .flash_update = mlx5_devlink_flash_update,
> .info_get = mlx5_devlink_info_get,
> + .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT),
> .reload_down = mlx5_devlink_reload_down,
> .reload_up = mlx5_devlink_reload_up,
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
> index ec45a03140d7..c0a32f685b85 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
> @@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ mlxsw_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_info_req *req,
>
> static int
> mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink,
> - bool netns_change,
> + bool netns_change, enum devlink_reload_action action,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = devlink_priv(devlink);
> @@ -1126,15 +1126,24 @@ mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink,
> }
>
> static int
> -mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> + unsigned long *actions_performed)
Sorry for repeating again, for fw_activate action on our device, all
the driver entities undergo reset asynchronously once user initiates
"devlink dev reload action fw_activate" and reload_up does not have
much to do except reporting actions that will be/being performed.

Once reset is complete, the health reporter will be notified using
devlink_health_reporter_recovery_done(). Returning from reload_up does
not guarantee successful activation of firmware. Status of reset will
be notified to the health reporter via
devlink_health_reporter_state_update().

I am just repeating this, so I want to know if I am on the same page.

Thanks.
> {
> struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = devlink_priv(devlink);
> + int err;
>
> - return mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(mlxsw_core->bus_info,
> - mlxsw_core->bus,
> - mlxsw_core->bus_priv, true,
> - devlink, extack);
> + err = mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(mlxsw_core->bus_info,
> + mlxsw_core->bus,
> + mlxsw_core->bus_priv, true,
> + devlink, extack);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + if (actions_performed)
> + *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT) |
> + BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int mlxsw_devlink_flash_update(struct devlink *devlink,
> @@ -1268,6 +1277,8 @@ mlxsw_devlink_trap_policer_counter_get(struct devlink *devlink,
> }
>
> static const struct devlink_ops mlxsw_devlink_ops = {
> + .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT) |
> + BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE),
What if drivers do not support DRIVER_REINIT operation directly but
when users issue FW_ACTIVATE, driver performs both FW_ACTIVATE and
DRIVER_REINIT? That particular driver has to advertise only
DRIVER_REINIT action, right?

> .reload_down = mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down,
> .reload_up = mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up,
> .port_type_set = mlxsw_devlink_port_type_set,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> index 32f339fedb21..f0919fa0cd8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static int nsim_dev_reload_create(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev,
> static void nsim_dev_reload_destroy(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev);
>
> static int nsim_dev_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> + enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
>
> @@ -713,10 +713,11 @@ static int nsim_dev_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int nsim_dev_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +static int nsim_dev_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
> {
> struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
> + int err;
>
> if (nsim_dev->fail_reload) {
> /* For testing purposes, user set debugfs fail_reload
> @@ -726,7 +727,13 @@ static int nsim_dev_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - return nsim_dev_reload_create(nsim_dev, extack);
> + err = nsim_dev_reload_create(nsim_dev, extack);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + if (actions_performed)
> + *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int nsim_dev_info_get(struct devlink *devlink,
> @@ -875,6 +882,7 @@ nsim_dev_devlink_trap_policer_counter_get(struct devlink *devlink,
> }
>
> static const struct devlink_ops nsim_dev_devlink_ops = {
> + .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT),
> .reload_down = nsim_dev_reload_down,
> .reload_up = nsim_dev_reload_up,
> .info_get = nsim_dev_info_get,
> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
> index eaec0a8cc5ef..b09db891db04 100644
> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> @@ -1011,10 +1011,11 @@ enum devlink_trap_group_generic_id {
> }
>
> struct devlink_ops {
> + unsigned long supported_reload_actions;
> int (*reload_down)(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> - int (*reload_up)(struct devlink *devlink,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> + enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> + int (*reload_up)(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed);
> int (*port_type_set)(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
> enum devlink_port_type port_type);
> int (*port_split)(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int port_index,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> index 40d35145c879..a6f64db0bdf3 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> @@ -272,6 +272,21 @@ enum {
> DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_METADATA_TYPE_FA_COOKIE,
> };
>
> +/**
> + * enum devlink_reload_action - Reload action.
> + * @DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT: Driver entities re-instantiation.
> + * @DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE: FW activate.
> + */
> +enum devlink_reload_action {
> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC,
> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT,
> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE,
> +
> + /* Add new reload actions above */
> + __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX,
> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX = __DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX - 1
> +};
> +
> enum devlink_attr {
> /* don't change the order or add anything between, this is ABI! */
> DEVLINK_ATTR_UNSPEC,
> @@ -460,6 +475,10 @@ enum devlink_attr {
>
> DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_EXTERNAL, /* u8 */
> DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_CONTROLLER_NUMBER, /* u32 */
> +
> + DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, /* u8 */
> + DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED, /* nested */
> +
> /* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
>
> __DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX,
> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> index 19037f114307..f4be1e1bf864 100644
> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> @@ -462,6 +462,12 @@ static int devlink_nl_put_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool
> +devlink_reload_action_is_supported(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action)
> +{
> + return test_bit(action, &devlink->ops->supported_reload_actions);
> +}
> +
> static int devlink_nl_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
> enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
> u32 seq, int flags)
> @@ -2969,29 +2975,72 @@ bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_is_reload_failed);
>
> static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> + enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> + unsigned long *actions_performed)
> {
> int err;
>
> if (!devlink->reload_enabled)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, extack);
> + err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, action, extack);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> if (dest_net && !net_eq(dest_net, devlink_net(devlink)))
> devlink_reload_netns_change(devlink, dest_net);
>
> - err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, extack);
> + err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, extack, actions_performed);
> devlink_reload_failed_set(devlink, !!err);
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int
> +devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
> + struct devlink *devlink,
> + unsigned long actions_performed,
> + enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
> + u32 seq, int flags)
> +{
> + struct nlattr *actions_performed_attr;
> + void *hdr;
> + int i;
> +
> + hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, portid, seq, &devlink_nl_family, flags, cmd);
> + if (!hdr)
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> + if (devlink_nl_put_handle(msg, devlink))
> + goto genlmsg_cancel;
> +
> + actions_performed_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED);
> + if (!actions_performed_attr)
> + goto genlmsg_cancel;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX; i++) {
> + if (!test_bit(i, &actions_performed))
> + continue;
> + if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, i))
> + goto actions_performed_nest_cancel;
> + }
> + nla_nest_end(msg, actions_performed_attr);
> + genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
> + return 0;
> +
> +actions_performed_nest_cancel:
> + nla_nest_cancel(msg, actions_performed_attr);
> +genlmsg_cancel:
> + genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +}
> +
> static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> {
> struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
> + enum devlink_reload_action action;
> + unsigned long actions_performed;
> struct net *dest_net = NULL;
> + struct sk_buff *msg;
> int err;
>
> if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))
> @@ -3011,12 +3060,41 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return PTR_ERR(dest_net);
> }
>
> - err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, info->extack);
> + if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION])
> + action = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION]);
> + else
> + action = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT;
> +
> + if (action == DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC || action > DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Invalid reload action");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (!devlink_reload_action_is_supported(devlink, action)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Requested reload action is not supported");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, action, info->extack, &actions_performed);
>
> if (dest_net)
> put_net(dest_net);
>
> - return err;
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!actions_performed);
> + msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!msg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + err = devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(msg, devlink, actions_performed,
> + DEVLINK_CMD_RELOAD, info->snd_portid,
> + info->snd_seq, 0);
> + if (err) {
> + nlmsg_free(msg);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
> }
>
> static int devlink_nl_flash_update_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
> @@ -7047,6 +7125,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
> [DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_RATE] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
> [DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_BURST] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
> [DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FUNCTION] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> + [DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> };
>
> static const struct genl_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
> @@ -7372,6 +7451,20 @@ static struct genl_family devlink_nl_family __ro_after_init = {
> .n_mcgrps = ARRAY_SIZE(devlink_nl_mcgrps),
> };
>
> +static int devlink_reload_actions_verify(struct devlink *devlink)
> +{
> + const struct devlink_ops *ops;
> +
> + if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ops = devlink->ops;
> + if (WARN_ON(ops->supported_reload_actions >= BIT(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) ||
> + ops->supported_reload_actions <= BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * devlink_alloc - Allocate new devlink instance resources
> *
> @@ -7392,6 +7485,11 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops *ops, size_t priv_size)
> if (!devlink)
> return NULL;
> devlink->ops = ops;
> + if (devlink_reload_actions_verify(devlink)) {
> + kfree(devlink);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> xa_init_flags(&devlink->snapshot_ids, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
> __devlink_net_set(devlink, &init_net);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink->port_list);
> @@ -9657,7 +9755,8 @@ static void __net_exit devlink_pernet_pre_exit(struct net *net)
> if (net_eq(devlink_net(devlink), net)) {
> if (WARN_ON(!devlink_reload_supported(devlink)))
> continue;
> - err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net, NULL);
> + err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net,
> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT, NULL, NULL);
> if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> pr_warn("Failed to reload devlink instance into init_net\n");
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>

2020-09-14 09:33:37

by Jiri Pirko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:08:58AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:39 AM Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]> wrote:

[...]


>> @@ -1126,15 +1126,24 @@ mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink,
>> }
>>
>> static int
>> -mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
>> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
>> + unsigned long *actions_performed)
>Sorry for repeating again, for fw_activate action on our device, all
>the driver entities undergo reset asynchronously once user initiates
>"devlink dev reload action fw_activate" and reload_up does not have
>much to do except reporting actions that will be/being performed.
>
>Once reset is complete, the health reporter will be notified using

Hmm, how is the fw reset related to health reporter recovery? Recovery
happens after some error event. I don't believe it is wise to mix it.

Instead, why don't you block in reload_up() until the reset is complete?


>devlink_health_reporter_recovery_done(). Returning from reload_up does
>not guarantee successful activation of firmware. Status of reset will
>be notified to the health reporter via
>devlink_health_reporter_state_update().
>
>I am just repeating this, so I want to know if I am on the same page.
>
>Thanks.

[...]

2020-09-14 09:56:25

by Vasundhara Volam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:02 PM Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:08:58AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:39 AM Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
> >> @@ -1126,15 +1126,24 @@ mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink,
> >> }
> >>
> >> static int
> >> -mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
> >> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >> +mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
> >> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> >> + unsigned long *actions_performed)
> >Sorry for repeating again, for fw_activate action on our device, all
> >the driver entities undergo reset asynchronously once user initiates
> >"devlink dev reload action fw_activate" and reload_up does not have
> >much to do except reporting actions that will be/being performed.
> >
> >Once reset is complete, the health reporter will be notified using
>
> Hmm, how is the fw reset related to health reporter recovery? Recovery
> happens after some error event. I don't believe it is wise to mix it.
Our device has a fw_reset health reporter, which is updated on reset
events and firmware activation is one among them. All non-fatal
firmware reset events are reported on fw_reset health reporter.

>
> Instead, why don't you block in reload_up() until the reset is complete?

Though user initiate "devlink dev reload" event on a single interface,
all driver entities undergo reset and all entities recover
independently. I don't think we can block the reload_up() on the
interface(that user initiated the command), until whole reset is
complete.
>
>
> >devlink_health_reporter_recovery_done(). Returning from reload_up does
> >not guarantee successful activation of firmware. Status of reset will
> >be notified to the health reporter via
> >devlink_health_reporter_state_update().
> >
> >I am just repeating this, so I want to know if I am on the same page.
> >
> >Thanks.
>
> [...]

2020-09-14 11:40:25

by Jiri Pirko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:54:55AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:02 PM Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:08:58AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>> >On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:39 AM Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> >> @@ -1126,15 +1126,24 @@ mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> static int
>> >> -mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> >> +mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
>> >> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
>> >> + unsigned long *actions_performed)
>> >Sorry for repeating again, for fw_activate action on our device, all
>> >the driver entities undergo reset asynchronously once user initiates
>> >"devlink dev reload action fw_activate" and reload_up does not have
>> >much to do except reporting actions that will be/being performed.
>> >
>> >Once reset is complete, the health reporter will be notified using
>>
>> Hmm, how is the fw reset related to health reporter recovery? Recovery
>> happens after some error event. I don't believe it is wise to mix it.
>Our device has a fw_reset health reporter, which is updated on reset
>events and firmware activation is one among them. All non-fatal
>firmware reset events are reported on fw_reset health reporter.

Hmm, interesting. In that case, assuming this is fine, should we have
some standard in this. I mean, if the driver supports reset, should it
also define the "fw_reset" reporter to report such events?

Jakub, what is your take here?


>
>>
>> Instead, why don't you block in reload_up() until the reset is complete?
>
>Though user initiate "devlink dev reload" event on a single interface,
>all driver entities undergo reset and all entities recover
>independently. I don't think we can block the reload_up() on the
>interface(that user initiated the command), until whole reset is
>complete.

Why not? mlxsw reset takes up to like 10 seconds for example.


>>
>>
>> >devlink_health_reporter_recovery_done(). Returning from reload_up does
>> >not guarantee successful activation of firmware. Status of reset will
>> >be notified to the health reporter via
>> >devlink_health_reporter_state_update().
>> >
>> >I am just repeating this, so I want to know if I am on the same page.
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>>
>> [...]

2020-09-14 12:34:25

by Jiri Pirko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:48AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>Add devlink reload action to allow the user to request a specific reload
>action. The action parameter is optional, if not specified then devlink
>driver re-init action is used (backward compatible).
>Note that when required to do firmware activation some drivers may need
>to reload the driver. On the other hand some drivers may need to reset
>the firmware to reinitialize the driver entities. Therefore, the devlink
>reload command returns the actions which were actually performed.
>Reload actions supported are:
>driver_reinit: driver entities re-initialization, applying devlink-param
> and devlink-resource values.
>fw_activate: firmware activate.
>
>command examples:
>$devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action driver_reinit
>reload_actions_performed:
> driver_reinit
>
>$devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action fw_activate
>reload_actions_performed:
> driver_reinit fw_activate
>
>Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]>
>---
>v3 -> v4:
>- Removed fw_activate_no_reset as an action (next patch adds limit
> levels instead).
>- Renamed actions_done to actions_performed
>v2 -> v3:
>- Replace fw_live_patch action by fw_activate_no_reset
>- Devlink reload returns the actions done over netlink reply
>v1 -> v2:
>- Instead of reload levels driver,fw_reset,fw_live_patch have reload
> actions driver_reinit,fw_activate,fw_live_patch
>- Remove driver default level, the action driver_reinit is the default
> action for all drivers
>---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 14 ++-
> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 15 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c | 25 ++--
> drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c | 16 ++-
> include/net/devlink.h | 7 +-
> include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 19 +++
> net/core/devlink.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++-
> 7 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>index 70cf24ba71e4..aadf1676a0ed 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>@@ -3946,6 +3946,7 @@ static int mlx4_restart_one_up(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool reload,
> struct devlink *devlink);
>
> static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
>+ enum devlink_reload_action action,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
>@@ -3962,8 +3963,8 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> return 0;
> }
>
>-static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
>- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>+static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
>+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
> {
> struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
> struct mlx4_dev *dev = &priv->dev;
>@@ -3971,15 +3972,20 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
> int err;
>
> err = mlx4_restart_one_up(persist->pdev, true, devlink);
>- if (err)
>+ if (err) {
> mlx4_err(persist->dev, "mlx4_restart_one_up failed, ret=%d\n",
> err);
>+ return err;
>+ }
>+ if (actions_performed)

Nit, pass the unsigned long allways (even when it would be unused) and
avoid check in every driver.


>+ *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT);
>
>- return err;
>+ return 0;
> }
>
> static const struct devlink_ops mlx4_devlink_ops = {
> .port_type_set = mlx4_devlink_port_type_set,
>+ .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT),
> .reload_down = mlx4_devlink_reload_down,
> .reload_up = mlx4_devlink_reload_up,
> };

[..]


>@@ -2969,29 +2975,72 @@ bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_is_reload_failed);
>
> static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,
>- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>+ enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
>+ unsigned long *actions_performed)
> {
> int err;
>
> if (!devlink->reload_enabled)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
>- err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, extack);
>+ err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, action, extack);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> if (dest_net && !net_eq(dest_net, devlink_net(devlink)))
> devlink_reload_netns_change(devlink, dest_net);
>
>- err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, extack);
>+ err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, extack, actions_performed);

Here, please add a WARN_ON() check:
WARN_ON(!(*actions_performed & action));

The requested action should be always performed.


> devlink_reload_failed_set(devlink, !!err);
> return err;
> }
>
>+static int
>+devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
>+ struct devlink *devlink,
>+ unsigned long actions_performed,
>+ enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
>+ u32 seq, int flags)
>+{
>+ struct nlattr *actions_performed_attr;
>+ void *hdr;
>+ int i;
>+
>+ hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, portid, seq, &devlink_nl_family, flags, cmd);
>+ if (!hdr)
>+ return -EMSGSIZE;
>+
>+ if (devlink_nl_put_handle(msg, devlink))
>+ goto genlmsg_cancel;
>+
>+ actions_performed_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED);
>+ if (!actions_performed_attr)
>+ goto genlmsg_cancel;
>+
>+ for (i = 0; i <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX; i++) {
>+ if (!test_bit(i, &actions_performed))
>+ continue;
>+ if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, i))
>+ goto actions_performed_nest_cancel;
>+ }
>+ nla_nest_end(msg, actions_performed_attr);
>+ genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>+ return 0;
>+
>+actions_performed_nest_cancel:
>+ nla_nest_cancel(msg, actions_performed_attr);
>+genlmsg_cancel:
>+ genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>+ return -EMSGSIZE;
>+}
>+
> static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> {
> struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>+ enum devlink_reload_action action;
>+ unsigned long actions_performed;
> struct net *dest_net = NULL;
>+ struct sk_buff *msg;
> int err;
>
> if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))
>@@ -3011,12 +3060,41 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return PTR_ERR(dest_net);
> }
>
>- err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, info->extack);
>+ if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION])
>+ action = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION]);
>+ else
>+ action = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT;
>+
>+ if (action == DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC || action > DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) {
>+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Invalid reload action");

Hmm, I understand the unspec check, but the max check is not needed. The
following check will take care of it.


>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ } else if (!devlink_reload_action_is_supported(devlink, action)) {
>+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Requested reload action is not supported");

".. by the driver" ?


>+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+ }
>+
>+ err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, action, info->extack, &actions_performed);
>
> if (dest_net)
> put_net(dest_net);
>
>- return err;
>+ if (err)
>+ return err;
>+
>+ WARN_ON(!actions_performed);
>+ msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>+ if (!msg)
>+ return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+ err = devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(msg, devlink, actions_performed,
>+ DEVLINK_CMD_RELOAD, info->snd_portid,
>+ info->snd_seq, 0);
>+ if (err) {
>+ nlmsg_free(msg);
>+ return err;
>+ }
>+
>+ return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
> }
>
> static int devlink_nl_flash_update_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
>@@ -7047,6 +7125,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
> [DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_RATE] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
> [DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_BURST] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
> [DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FUNCTION] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
>+ [DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> };
>
> static const struct genl_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
>@@ -7372,6 +7451,20 @@ static struct genl_family devlink_nl_family __ro_after_init = {
> .n_mcgrps = ARRAY_SIZE(devlink_nl_mcgrps),
> };
>
>+static int devlink_reload_actions_verify(struct devlink *devlink)
>+{
>+ const struct devlink_ops *ops;
>+
>+ if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))

If reload is not supported, the supported_reload_actions should be 0.
Please check that with WARN_ON too.


>+ return 0;
>+
>+ ops = devlink->ops;
>+ if (WARN_ON(ops->supported_reload_actions >= BIT(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) ||
>+ ops->supported_reload_actions <= BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC)))
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
> /**
> * devlink_alloc - Allocate new devlink instance resources
> *
>@@ -7392,6 +7485,11 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops *ops, size_t priv_size)
> if (!devlink)
> return NULL;
> devlink->ops = ops;
>+ if (devlink_reload_actions_verify(devlink)) {

Move this check to the beginning. You don't need devlink instance for
the check, just ops.

also, your devlink_reload_actions_verify() function returns
0/-ESOMETHING. Treat it accordingly here.


>+ kfree(devlink);
>+ return NULL;
>+ }
>+
> xa_init_flags(&devlink->snapshot_ids, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
> __devlink_net_set(devlink, &init_net);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink->port_list);
>@@ -9657,7 +9755,8 @@ static void __net_exit devlink_pernet_pre_exit(struct net *net)
> if (net_eq(devlink_net(devlink), net)) {
> if (WARN_ON(!devlink_reload_supported(devlink)))
> continue;
>- err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net, NULL);
>+ err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net,
>+ DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT, NULL, NULL);
> if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> pr_warn("Failed to reload devlink instance into init_net\n");
> }
>--
>2.17.1
>

2020-09-14 21:32:45

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:28:29 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:54:55AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:02 PM Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> +mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
> >> >> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> >> >> + unsigned long *actions_performed)
> >> >Sorry for repeating again, for fw_activate action on our device, all
> >> >the driver entities undergo reset asynchronously once user initiates
> >> >"devlink dev reload action fw_activate" and reload_up does not have
> >> >much to do except reporting actions that will be/being performed.
> >> >
> >> >Once reset is complete, the health reporter will be notified using
> >>
> >> Hmm, how is the fw reset related to health reporter recovery? Recovery
> >> happens after some error event. I don't believe it is wise to mix it.
> >Our device has a fw_reset health reporter, which is updated on reset
> >events and firmware activation is one among them. All non-fatal
> >firmware reset events are reported on fw_reset health reporter.
>
> Hmm, interesting. In that case, assuming this is fine, should we have
> some standard in this. I mean, if the driver supports reset, should it
> also define the "fw_reset" reporter to report such events?
>
> Jakub, what is your take here?

Sounds doubly wrong to me.

As you say health reporters should trigger on error events,
communicating completion of an action requested by the user
seems very wrong. IIUC operators should monitor and collect
health failures. In this case looks like all events from fw_reset
would need to be discarded, since they are not meaningful
without the context of what triggered them.

And secondly, reporting the completion via some async mechanism
that user has to monitor is just plain lazy. That's pushing out
the work that has to be done out to user space. Wait for the
completion in the driver.

> >> Instead, why don't you block in reload_up() until the reset is complete?
> >
> >Though user initiate "devlink dev reload" event on a single interface,
> >all driver entities undergo reset and all entities recover
> >independently. I don't think we can block the reload_up() on the
> >interface(that user initiated the command), until whole reset is
> >complete.
>
> Why not? mlxsw reset takes up to like 10 seconds for example.

+1, why?

2020-09-14 21:34:34

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:07:48 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
> @@ -3011,12 +3060,41 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return PTR_ERR(dest_net);
> }
>
> - err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, info->extack);
> + if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION])
> + action = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION]);
> + else
> + action = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT;
> +
> + if (action == DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC || action > DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Invalid reload action");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (!devlink_reload_action_is_supported(devlink, action)) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Requested reload action is not supported");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, action, info->extack, &actions_performed);
>
> if (dest_net)
> put_net(dest_net);
>
> - return err;
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!actions_performed);
> + msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!msg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + err = devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(msg, devlink, actions_performed,
> + DEVLINK_CMD_RELOAD, info->snd_portid,
> + info->snd_seq, 0);
> + if (err) {
> + nlmsg_free(msg);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);

I think generating the reply may break existing users. Only generate
the reply if request contained DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION (or any other
new attribute which existing users can't pass).

2020-09-14 22:07:38

by Michael Chan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:31 PM Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:28:29 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > >> Instead, why don't you block in reload_up() until the reset is complete?
> > >
> > >Though user initiate "devlink dev reload" event on a single interface,
> > >all driver entities undergo reset and all entities recover
> > >independently. I don't think we can block the reload_up() on the
> > >interface(that user initiated the command), until whole reset is
> > >complete.
> >
> > Why not? mlxsw reset takes up to like 10 seconds for example.
>
> +1, why?

Yes, we should be able to block until the reset sequence is complete.
I don't see any problem. I will work with Vasundhara on this.

2020-09-15 06:21:58

by Jiri Pirko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:06:19AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:31 PM Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:28:29 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > >> Instead, why don't you block in reload_up() until the reset is complete?
>> > >
>> > >Though user initiate "devlink dev reload" event on a single interface,
>> > >all driver entities undergo reset and all entities recover
>> > >independently. I don't think we can block the reload_up() on the
>> > >interface(that user initiated the command), until whole reset is
>> > >complete.
>> >
>> > Why not? mlxsw reset takes up to like 10 seconds for example.
>>
>> +1, why?
>
>Yes, we should be able to block until the reset sequence is complete.
>I don't see any problem. I will work with Vasundhara on this.

Could you please also remove fw_reset as it is apparently misuse of
devlink health mechanism?

Thanks!

2020-09-15 12:19:00

by Moshe Shemesh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command


On 9/14/2020 3:27 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:48AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>> Add devlink reload action to allow the user to request a specific reload
>> action. The action parameter is optional, if not specified then devlink
>> driver re-init action is used (backward compatible).
>> Note that when required to do firmware activation some drivers may need
>> to reload the driver. On the other hand some drivers may need to reset
>> the firmware to reinitialize the driver entities. Therefore, the devlink
>> reload command returns the actions which were actually performed.
>> Reload actions supported are:
>> driver_reinit: driver entities re-initialization, applying devlink-param
>> and devlink-resource values.
>> fw_activate: firmware activate.
>>
>> command examples:
>> $devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action driver_reinit
>> reload_actions_performed:
>> driver_reinit
>>
>> $devlink dev reload pci/0000:82:00.0 action fw_activate
>> reload_actions_performed:
>> driver_reinit fw_activate
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> v3 -> v4:
>> - Removed fw_activate_no_reset as an action (next patch adds limit
>> levels instead).
>> - Renamed actions_done to actions_performed
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - Replace fw_live_patch action by fw_activate_no_reset
>> - Devlink reload returns the actions done over netlink reply
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - Instead of reload levels driver,fw_reset,fw_live_patch have reload
>> actions driver_reinit,fw_activate,fw_live_patch
>> - Remove driver default level, the action driver_reinit is the default
>> action for all drivers
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 14 ++-
>> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 15 ++-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c | 25 ++--
>> drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c | 16 ++-
>> include/net/devlink.h | 7 +-
>> include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 19 +++
>> net/core/devlink.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++-
>> 7 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>> index 70cf24ba71e4..aadf1676a0ed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>> @@ -3946,6 +3946,7 @@ static int mlx4_restart_one_up(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool reload,
>> struct devlink *devlink);
>>
>> static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
>> + enum devlink_reload_action action,
>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> {
>> struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> @@ -3962,8 +3963,8 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
>> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_reload_action action,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, unsigned long *actions_performed)
>> {
>> struct mlx4_priv *priv = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> struct mlx4_dev *dev = &priv->dev;
>> @@ -3971,15 +3972,20 @@ static int mlx4_devlink_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink,
>> int err;
>>
>> err = mlx4_restart_one_up(persist->pdev, true, devlink);
>> - if (err)
>> + if (err) {
>> mlx4_err(persist->dev, "mlx4_restart_one_up failed, ret=%d\n",
>> err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + if (actions_performed)
> Nit, pass the unsigned long allways (even when it would be unused) and
> avoid check in every driver.
>

Ack.

>> + *actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT);
>>
>> - return err;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static const struct devlink_ops mlx4_devlink_ops = {
>> .port_type_set = mlx4_devlink_port_type_set,
>> + .supported_reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT),
>> .reload_down = mlx4_devlink_reload_down,
>> .reload_up = mlx4_devlink_reload_up,
>> };
> [..]
>
>
>> @@ -2969,29 +2975,72 @@ bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_is_reload_failed);
>>
>> static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,
>> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> + enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
>> + unsigned long *actions_performed)
>> {
>> int err;
>>
>> if (!devlink->reload_enabled)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> - err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, extack);
>> + err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, action, extack);
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>>
>> if (dest_net && !net_eq(dest_net, devlink_net(devlink)))
>> devlink_reload_netns_change(devlink, dest_net);
>>
>> - err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, extack);
>> + err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, extack, actions_performed);
> Here, please add a WARN_ON() check:
> WARN_ON(!(*actions_performed & action));
>
> The requested action should be always performed.
>
Good point, I will add.
>> devlink_reload_failed_set(devlink, !!err);
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +static int
>> +devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
>> + struct devlink *devlink,
>> + unsigned long actions_performed,
>> + enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
>> + u32 seq, int flags)
>> +{
>> + struct nlattr *actions_performed_attr;
>> + void *hdr;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, portid, seq, &devlink_nl_family, flags, cmd);
>> + if (!hdr)
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> + if (devlink_nl_put_handle(msg, devlink))
>> + goto genlmsg_cancel;
>> +
>> + actions_performed_attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED);
>> + if (!actions_performed_attr)
>> + goto genlmsg_cancel;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i <= DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX; i++) {
>> + if (!test_bit(i, &actions_performed))
>> + continue;
>> + if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, i))
>> + goto actions_performed_nest_cancel;
>> + }
>> + nla_nest_end(msg, actions_performed_attr);
>> + genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +actions_performed_nest_cancel:
>> + nla_nest_cancel(msg, actions_performed_attr);
>> +genlmsg_cancel:
>> + genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>> {
>> struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>> + enum devlink_reload_action action;
>> + unsigned long actions_performed;
>> struct net *dest_net = NULL;
>> + struct sk_buff *msg;
>> int err;
>>
>> if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))
>> @@ -3011,12 +3060,41 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>> return PTR_ERR(dest_net);
>> }
>>
>> - err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, info->extack);
>> + if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION])
>> + action = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION]);
>> + else
>> + action = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT;
>> +
>> + if (action == DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC || action > DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Invalid reload action");
> Hmm, I understand the unspec check, but the max check is not needed. The
> following check will take care of it.
>
Ack.
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else if (!devlink_reload_action_is_supported(devlink, action)) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Requested reload action is not supported");
> ".. by the driver" ?
>


Yes, will fix.

>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, action, info->extack, &actions_performed);
>>
>> if (dest_net)
>> put_net(dest_net);
>>
>> - return err;
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(!actions_performed);
>> + msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!msg)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + err = devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(msg, devlink, actions_performed,
>> + DEVLINK_CMD_RELOAD, info->snd_portid,
>> + info->snd_seq, 0);
>> + if (err) {
>> + nlmsg_free(msg);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
>> }
>>
>> static int devlink_nl_flash_update_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
>> @@ -7047,6 +7125,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
>> [DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_RATE] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
>> [DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_BURST] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
>> [DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FUNCTION] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
>> + [DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
>> };
>>
>> static const struct genl_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
>> @@ -7372,6 +7451,20 @@ static struct genl_family devlink_nl_family __ro_after_init = {
>> .n_mcgrps = ARRAY_SIZE(devlink_nl_mcgrps),
>> };
>>
>> +static int devlink_reload_actions_verify(struct devlink *devlink)
>> +{
>> + const struct devlink_ops *ops;
>> +
>> + if (!devlink_reload_supported(devlink))
> If reload is not supported, the supported_reload_actions should be 0.
> Please check that with WARN_ON too.
>
OK, same goes to supported limit levels.
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + ops = devlink->ops;
>> + if (WARN_ON(ops->supported_reload_actions >= BIT(__DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) ||
>> + ops->supported_reload_actions <= BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC)))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * devlink_alloc - Allocate new devlink instance resources
>> *
>> @@ -7392,6 +7485,11 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops *ops, size_t priv_size)
>> if (!devlink)
>> return NULL;
>> devlink->ops = ops;
>> + if (devlink_reload_actions_verify(devlink)) {
> Move this check to the beginning. You don't need devlink instance for
> the check, just ops.


Right, will fix.

> also, your devlink_reload_actions_verify() function returns
> 0/-ESOMETHING. Treat it accordingly here.


Well, yes, but I rather return NULL here since devlink_alloc() failed.
If devlink_reload_actions_verify() fails it has WARN_ON which will lead
the driver developer to his bug.

>
>> + kfree(devlink);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> xa_init_flags(&devlink->snapshot_ids, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>> __devlink_net_set(devlink, &init_net);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink->port_list);
>> @@ -9657,7 +9755,8 @@ static void __net_exit devlink_pernet_pre_exit(struct net *net)
>> if (net_eq(devlink_net(devlink), net)) {
>> if (WARN_ON(!devlink_reload_supported(devlink)))
>> continue;
>> - err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net, NULL);
>> + err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net,
>> + DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT, NULL, NULL);
>> if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> pr_warn("Failed to reload devlink instance into init_net\n");
>> }
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>

2020-09-15 13:06:37

by Moshe Shemesh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command


On 9/15/2020 12:33 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:07:48 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
>> @@ -3011,12 +3060,41 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>> return PTR_ERR(dest_net);
>> }
>>
>> - err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, info->extack);
>> + if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION])
>> + action = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION]);
>> + else
>> + action = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT;
>> +
>> + if (action == DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC || action > DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Invalid reload action");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else if (!devlink_reload_action_is_supported(devlink, action)) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Requested reload action is not supported");
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, action, info->extack, &actions_performed);
>>
>> if (dest_net)
>> put_net(dest_net);
>>
>> - return err;
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(!actions_performed);
>> + msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!msg)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + err = devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(msg, devlink, actions_performed,
>> + DEVLINK_CMD_RELOAD, info->snd_portid,
>> + info->snd_seq, 0);
>> + if (err) {
>> + nlmsg_free(msg);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
> I think generating the reply may break existing users. Only generate
> the reply if request contained DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION (or any other
> new attribute which existing users can't pass).


OK, I can do that. But I update stats and generate devlink notification
anyway, that should fine, right ?

2020-09-15 22:43:08

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:56:48 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
> On 9/15/2020 12:33 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >> + if (err)
> >> + return err;
> >> +
> >> + WARN_ON(!actions_performed);
> >> + msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!msg)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> + err = devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(msg, devlink, actions_performed,
> >> + DEVLINK_CMD_RELOAD, info->snd_portid,
> >> + info->snd_seq, 0);
> >> + if (err) {
> >> + nlmsg_free(msg);
> >> + return err;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
> > I think generating the reply may break existing users. Only generate
> > the reply if request contained DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION (or any other
> > new attribute which existing users can't pass).
>
> OK, I can do that. But I update stats and generate devlink notification
> anyway, that should fine, right ?

Yes, that should be fine.

2020-09-16 00:37:39

by Jiri Pirko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:56:48PM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>
>On 9/15/2020 12:33 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:07:48 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
>> > @@ -3011,12 +3060,41 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_reload(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>> > return PTR_ERR(dest_net);
>> > }
>> >
>> > - err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, info->extack);
>> > + if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION])
>> > + action = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION]);
>> > + else
>> > + action = DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT;
>> > +
>> > + if (action == DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_UNSPEC || action > DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX) {
>> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Invalid reload action");
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > + } else if (!devlink_reload_action_is_supported(devlink, action)) {
>> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "Requested reload action is not supported");
>> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + err = devlink_reload(devlink, dest_net, action, info->extack, &actions_performed);
>> >
>> > if (dest_net)
>> > put_net(dest_net);
>> >
>> > - return err;
>> > + if (err)
>> > + return err;
>> > +
>> > + WARN_ON(!actions_performed);
>> > + msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > + if (!msg)
>> > + return -ENOMEM;
>> > +
>> > + err = devlink_nl_reload_actions_performed_fill(msg, devlink, actions_performed,
>> > + DEVLINK_CMD_RELOAD, info->snd_portid,
>> > + info->snd_seq, 0);
>> > + if (err) {
>> > + nlmsg_free(msg);
>> > + return err;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
>> I think generating the reply may break existing users. Only generate
>> the reply if request contained DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION (or any other
>> new attribute which existing users can't pass).
>
>
>OK, I can do that. But I update stats and generate devlink notification
>anyway, that should fine, right ?

Yes.

>

2020-09-16 00:37:39

by Jiri Pirko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command

Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:12:25PM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>
>On 9/14/2020 3:27 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:48AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:

[..]

>> > @@ -7392,6 +7485,11 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops *ops, size_t priv_size)
>> > if (!devlink)
>> > return NULL;
>> > devlink->ops = ops;
>> > + if (devlink_reload_actions_verify(devlink)) {
>> Move this check to the beginning. You don't need devlink instance for
>> the check, just ops.
>
>
>Right, will fix.
>
>> also, your devlink_reload_actions_verify() function returns
>> 0/-ESOMETHING. Treat it accordingly here.
>
>
>Well, yes, but I rather return NULL here since devlink_alloc() failed. If
>devlink_reload_actions_verify() fails it has WARN_ON which will lead the
>driver developer to his bug.

So let the verify() return bool.
My point is, if a function return 0/-ESOMETHING, you should not check
the return value directly but you should use int err/ret.

>
>>
>> > + kfree(devlink);
>> > + return NULL;
>> > + }

[...]

2020-09-16 01:09:35

by Moshe Shemesh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 01/15] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command


On 9/15/2020 4:26 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:12:25PM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>> On 9/14/2020 3:27 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:07:48AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
> [..]
>
>>>> @@ -7392,6 +7485,11 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops *ops, size_t priv_size)
>>>> if (!devlink)
>>>> return NULL;
>>>> devlink->ops = ops;
>>>> + if (devlink_reload_actions_verify(devlink)) {
>>> Move this check to the beginning. You don't need devlink instance for
>>> the check, just ops.
>>
>> Right, will fix.
>>
>>> also, your devlink_reload_actions_verify() function returns
>>> 0/-ESOMETHING. Treat it accordingly here.
>>
>> Well, yes, but I rather return NULL here since devlink_alloc() failed. If
>> devlink_reload_actions_verify() fails it has WARN_ON which will lead the
>> driver developer to his bug.
> So let the verify() return bool.
> My point is, if a function return 0/-ESOMETHING, you should not check
> the return value directly but you should use int err/ret.


OK, will fix.

>>>> + kfree(devlink);
>>>> + return NULL;
>>>> + }
> [...]