[ cc'd: lkml ]
On 02/10/2008, Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/10/2008, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Oruba <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > microcode_update_cpu() is still there, being called from
> > > microcode_init_cpu() and mc_sysdev_resume().
> >
> >
> > ah, microcode_update_cpu, not update_microcode_cpu. So yes, the problem
> > is still there with the latest code.
>
Right, I've been looking at the wrong tree. Please find the fix
enclosed. Compiles ok, shouldn't break anything else.
>
> Ingo
>
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
err... I appologize for spamming. I've forgot to attach the fix.
>
>
> On 02/10/2008, Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 02/10/2008, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > * Peter Oruba <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > microcode_update_cpu() is still there, being called from
> > > > microcode_init_cpu() and mc_sysdev_resume().
> > >
> > >
> > > ah, microcode_update_cpu, not update_microcode_cpu. So yes, the problem
> > > is still there with the latest code.
> >
>
> Right, I've been looking at the wrong tree. Please find the fix
> enclosed. Compiles ok, shouldn't break anything else.
>
> >
> > Ingo
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Dmitry Adamushko
>
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
* Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Right, I've been looking at the wrong tree. Please find the fix
> > enclosed. Compiles ok, shouldn't break anything else.
applied to tip/x86/microcode, thanks Dmitry!
Ingo