On 11/21/2017 03:14 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Bisect points to
>
> 1b5a7455d345b223d3a4658a9e5fce985b7998c1 is the first bad commit
> commit 1b5a7455d345b223d3a4658a9e5fce985b7998c1
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon Jun 26 12:20:57 2017 +0200
>
> blk-mq: Create hctx for each present CPU
>
> commit 4b855ad37194f7bdbb200ce7a1c7051fecb56a08 upstream.
>
> Currently we only create hctx for online CPUs, which can lead to a lot
> of churn due to frequent soft offline / online operations. Instead
> allocate one for each present CPU to avoid this and dramatically simplify
> the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> Cc: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
I wonder if we're simply not getting the masks updated correctly. I'll
take a look.
--
Jens Axboe
From 1584670276912512570@xxx Tue Nov 21 10:15:43 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1584670276912512570
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread