2019-12-03 08:03:12

by Masami Hiramatsu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] perf probe: Fix to delete multiple probe event

Fix to delete multiple probe event with filter correctly.

When we put an event with multiple probes, perf-probe fails
to delete with filters. This comes from a failure to list
up the event name because of overwrapping its name.

To fix this issue, skip to list up the event which has
same name.

Without this patch:
# perf probe -l \*
probe_perf:map__map_ip (on perf_sample__fprintf_brstackoff:21@
probe_perf:map__map_ip (on perf_sample__fprintf_brstackoff:25@
probe_perf:map__map_ip (on append_inlines:12@util/machine.c in
probe_perf:map__map_ip (on unwind_entry:19@util/machine.c in /
probe_perf:map__map_ip (on map__map_ip@util/map.h in /home/mhi
probe_perf:map__map_ip (on map__map_ip@util/map.h in /home/mhi
# perf probe -d \*
"*" does not hit any event.
Error: Failed to delete events. Reason: No such file or directory (Code: -2)

With this:
# perf probe -d \*
Removed event: probe_perf:map__map_ip

Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
---
tools/perf/util/probe-file.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
index 5003ba403345..c03a591d41a4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
@@ -206,6 +206,9 @@ static struct strlist *__probe_file__get_namelist(int fd, bool include_group)
} else
ret = strlist__add(sl, tev.event);
clear_probe_trace_event(&tev);
+ /* Skip if there is same name multi-probe event in the list */
+ if (ret == -EEXIST)
+ ret = 0;
if (ret < 0)
break;
}


2019-12-04 02:30:47

by Masami Hiramatsu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Fix to delete multiple probe event

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:01:54 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Fix to delete multiple probe event with filter correctly.
>
> When we put an event with multiple probes, perf-probe fails
> to delete with filters. This comes from a failure to list
> up the event name because of overwrapping its name.
>
> To fix this issue, skip to list up the event which has
> same name.
>
> Without this patch:
> # perf probe -l \*
> probe_perf:map__map_ip (on perf_sample__fprintf_brstackoff:21@
> probe_perf:map__map_ip (on perf_sample__fprintf_brstackoff:25@
> probe_perf:map__map_ip (on append_inlines:12@util/machine.c in
> probe_perf:map__map_ip (on unwind_entry:19@util/machine.c in /
> probe_perf:map__map_ip (on map__map_ip@util/map.h in /home/mhi
> probe_perf:map__map_ip (on map__map_ip@util/map.h in /home/mhi
> # perf probe -d \*
> "*" does not hit any event.
> Error: Failed to delete events. Reason: No such file or directory (Code: -2)
>
> With this:
> # perf probe -d \*
> Removed event: probe_perf:map__map_ip
>

Oops, I missed Fixed tag.

Fixes: 72363540c009 ("perf probe: Support multiprobe event")

Thanks,

> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/probe-file.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> index 5003ba403345..c03a591d41a4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,9 @@ static struct strlist *__probe_file__get_namelist(int fd, bool include_group)
> } else
> ret = strlist__add(sl, tev.event);
> clear_probe_trace_event(&tev);
> + /* Skip if there is same name multi-probe event in the list */
> + if (ret == -EEXIST)
> + ret = 0;
> if (ret < 0)
> break;
> }
>


--
Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>

2020-01-08 02:38:15

by Masami Hiramatsu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Fix to delete multiple probe event

Hi Arnaldo,

Could you pick this fix?

Sandipan, could you also test this?

Thank you,

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:29:52 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:01:54 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Fix to delete multiple probe event with filter correctly.
> >
> > When we put an event with multiple probes, perf-probe fails
> > to delete with filters. This comes from a failure to list
> > up the event name because of overwrapping its name.
> >
> > To fix this issue, skip to list up the event which has
> > same name.
> >
> > Without this patch:
> > # perf probe -l \*
> > probe_perf:map__map_ip (on perf_sample__fprintf_brstackoff:21@
> > probe_perf:map__map_ip (on perf_sample__fprintf_brstackoff:25@
> > probe_perf:map__map_ip (on append_inlines:12@util/machine.c in
> > probe_perf:map__map_ip (on unwind_entry:19@util/machine.c in /
> > probe_perf:map__map_ip (on map__map_ip@util/map.h in /home/mhi
> > probe_perf:map__map_ip (on map__map_ip@util/map.h in /home/mhi
> > # perf probe -d \*
> > "*" does not hit any event.
> > Error: Failed to delete events. Reason: No such file or directory (Code: -2)
> >
> > With this:
> > # perf probe -d \*
> > Removed event: probe_perf:map__map_ip
> >
>
> Oops, I missed Fixed tag.
>
> Fixes: 72363540c009 ("perf probe: Support multiprobe event")
>
> Thanks,
>
> > Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/probe-file.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> > index 5003ba403345..c03a591d41a4 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> > @@ -206,6 +206,9 @@ static struct strlist *__probe_file__get_namelist(int fd, bool include_group)
> > } else
> > ret = strlist__add(sl, tev.event);
> > clear_probe_trace_event(&tev);
> > + /* Skip if there is same name multi-probe event in the list */
> > + if (ret == -EEXIST)
> > + ret = 0;
> > if (ret < 0)
> > break;
> > }
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>


--
Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>

2020-01-08 05:54:11

by Sandipan Das

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Fix to delete multiple probe event


On 08/01/20 8:06 am, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> Could you pick this fix?
>
> Sandipan, could you also test this?
>
[...]

Thanks for fixing this.

Tested-by: Sandipan Das <[email protected]>