2021-11-26 09:49:44

by Johan Hovold

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] USB: serial: cp210x: fix CP2105 GPIO registration

When generalising GPIO support and adding support for CP2102N, the GPIO
registration for some CP2105 devices accidentally broke. Specifically,
when all the pins of a port are in "modem" mode, and thus unavailable
for GPIO use, the GPIO chip would now be registered without having
initialised the number of GPIO lines. This would in turn be rejected by
gpiolib and some errors messages would be printed (but importantly probe
would still succeed).

Fix this by initialising the number of GPIO lines before registering the
GPIO chip.

Note that as for the other device types, and as when all CP2105 pins are
muxed for LED function, the GPIO chip is registered also when no pins
are available for GPIO use.

Reported-by: Maarten Brock <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: c8acfe0aadbe ("USB: serial: cp210x: implement GPIO support for CP2102N")
Cc: [email protected] # 4.19
Cc: Karoly Pados <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
index 7705328034ca..8a60c0d56863 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
@@ -1635,6 +1635,8 @@ static int cp2105_gpioconf_init(struct usb_serial *serial)

/* 2 banks of GPIO - One for the pins taken from each serial port */
if (intf_num == 0) {
+ priv->gc.ngpio = 2;
+
if (mode.eci == CP210X_PIN_MODE_MODEM) {
/* mark all GPIOs of this interface as reserved */
priv->gpio_altfunc = 0xff;
@@ -1645,8 +1647,9 @@ static int cp2105_gpioconf_init(struct usb_serial *serial)
priv->gpio_pushpull = (u8)((le16_to_cpu(config.gpio_mode) &
CP210X_ECI_GPIO_MODE_MASK) >>
CP210X_ECI_GPIO_MODE_OFFSET);
- priv->gc.ngpio = 2;
} else if (intf_num == 1) {
+ priv->gc.ngpio = 3;
+
if (mode.sci == CP210X_PIN_MODE_MODEM) {
/* mark all GPIOs of this interface as reserved */
priv->gpio_altfunc = 0xff;
@@ -1657,7 +1660,6 @@ static int cp2105_gpioconf_init(struct usb_serial *serial)
priv->gpio_pushpull = (u8)((le16_to_cpu(config.gpio_mode) &
CP210X_SCI_GPIO_MODE_MASK) >>
CP210X_SCI_GPIO_MODE_OFFSET);
- priv->gc.ngpio = 3;
} else {
return -ENODEV;
}
--
2.32.0



2021-11-26 09:59:00

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: cp210x: fix CP2105 GPIO registration

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:43:48AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> When generalising GPIO support and adding support for CP2102N, the GPIO
> registration for some CP2105 devices accidentally broke. Specifically,
> when all the pins of a port are in "modem" mode, and thus unavailable
> for GPIO use, the GPIO chip would now be registered without having
> initialised the number of GPIO lines. This would in turn be rejected by
> gpiolib and some errors messages would be printed (but importantly probe
> would still succeed).
>
> Fix this by initialising the number of GPIO lines before registering the
> GPIO chip.
>
> Note that as for the other device types, and as when all CP2105 pins are
> muxed for LED function, the GPIO chip is registered also when no pins
> are available for GPIO use.
>
> Reported-by: Maarten Brock <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Fixes: c8acfe0aadbe ("USB: serial: cp210x: implement GPIO support for CP2102N")
> Cc: [email protected] # 4.19
> Cc: Karoly Pados <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>


Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

2021-11-26 13:12:59

by Maarten Brock

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: cp210x: fix CP2105 GPIO registration

On 2021-11-26 10:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
> When generalising GPIO support and adding support for CP2102N, the GPIO
> registration for some CP2105 devices accidentally broke. Specifically,
> when all the pins of a port are in "modem" mode, and thus unavailable
> for GPIO use, the GPIO chip would now be registered without having
> initialised the number of GPIO lines. This would in turn be rejected by
> gpiolib and some errors messages would be printed (but importantly
> probe
> would still succeed).
>
> Fix this by initialising the number of GPIO lines before registering
> the
> GPIO chip.
>
> Note that as for the other device types, and as when all CP2105 pins
> are
> muxed for LED function, the GPIO chip is registered also when no pins
> are available for GPIO use.
>
> Reported-by: Maarten Brock <[email protected]>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Fixes: c8acfe0aadbe ("USB: serial: cp210x: implement GPIO support for
> CP2102N")
> Cc: [email protected] # 4.19
> Cc: Karoly Pados <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> index 7705328034ca..8a60c0d56863 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> @@ -1635,6 +1635,8 @@ static int cp2105_gpioconf_init(struct usb_serial
> *serial)
>
> /* 2 banks of GPIO - One for the pins taken from each serial port */
> if (intf_num == 0) {
> + priv->gc.ngpio = 2;
> +
> if (mode.eci == CP210X_PIN_MODE_MODEM) {
> /* mark all GPIOs of this interface as reserved */
> priv->gpio_altfunc = 0xff;
> @@ -1645,8 +1647,9 @@ static int cp2105_gpioconf_init(struct usb_serial
> *serial)
> priv->gpio_pushpull = (u8)((le16_to_cpu(config.gpio_mode) &
> CP210X_ECI_GPIO_MODE_MASK) >>
> CP210X_ECI_GPIO_MODE_OFFSET);
> - priv->gc.ngpio = 2;
> } else if (intf_num == 1) {
> + priv->gc.ngpio = 3;
> +
> if (mode.sci == CP210X_PIN_MODE_MODEM) {
> /* mark all GPIOs of this interface as reserved */
> priv->gpio_altfunc = 0xff;
> @@ -1657,7 +1660,6 @@ static int cp2105_gpioconf_init(struct usb_serial
> *serial)
> priv->gpio_pushpull = (u8)((le16_to_cpu(config.gpio_mode) &
> CP210X_SCI_GPIO_MODE_MASK) >>
> CP210X_SCI_GPIO_MODE_OFFSET);
> - priv->gc.ngpio = 3;
> } else {
> return -ENODEV;
> }

Tested-by: Maarten Brock <[email protected]>