2020-08-18 06:38:41

by Zenghui Yu

Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI/IORT: Code cleanups

* From v1 [1]:
- As pointed out by Hanjun, remove two now unused inline functions.
Compile tested with CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not selected.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Zenghui Yu (2):
ACPI/IORT: Drop the unused @ops of iort_add_device_replay()
ACPI/IORT: Remove the unused inline functions

drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--
2.19.1

2020-08-18 09:18:19

by Hanjun Guo

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI/IORT: Code cleanups

On 2020/8/18 14:36, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> * From v1 [1]:
> - As pointed out by Hanjun, remove two now unused inline functions.
> Compile tested with CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not selected.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>
> Zenghui Yu (2):
> ACPI/IORT: Drop the unused @ops of iort_add_device_replay()
> ACPI/IORT: Remove the unused inline functions
>
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Nice cleanup.

Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>

2020-09-02 09:18:54

by Hanjun Guo

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI/IORT: Code cleanups

+Cc Will

On 2020/8/18 17:16, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2020/8/18 14:36, Zenghui Yu wrote:
>> * From v1 [1]:
>>    - As pointed out by Hanjun, remove two now unused inline functions.
>>      Compile tested with CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not selected.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>>
>> Zenghui Yu (2):
>>    ACPI/IORT: Drop the unused @ops of iort_add_device_replay()
>>    ACPI/IORT: Remove the unused inline functions
>>
>>   drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 10 ++--------
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Nice cleanup.
>
> Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>

Will, would you mind taking this patch set via ARM64 tree?

Thanks
Hanjun

2020-09-02 09:33:08

by Lorenzo Pieralisi

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI/IORT: Code cleanups

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 02:36:23PM +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> * From v1 [1]:
> - As pointed out by Hanjun, remove two now unused inline functions.
> Compile tested with CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not selected.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>
> Zenghui Yu (2):
> ACPI/IORT: Drop the unused @ops of iort_add_device_replay()
> ACPI/IORT: Remove the unused inline functions
>
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

On the series:

Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>

2020-09-02 09:51:31

by Will Deacon

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI/IORT: Code cleanups

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:17:43PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> +Cc Will
>
> On 2020/8/18 17:16, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > On 2020/8/18 14:36, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> > > * From v1 [1]:
> > > ?? - As pointed out by Hanjun, remove two now unused inline functions.
> > > ???? Compile tested with CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not selected.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> > >
> > > Zenghui Yu (2):
> > > ?? ACPI/IORT: Drop the unused @ops of iort_add_device_replay()
> > > ?? ACPI/IORT: Remove the unused inline functions
> > >
> > > ? drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 10 ++--------
> > > ? 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > Nice cleanup.
> >
> > Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>
>
> Will, would you mind taking this patch set via ARM64 tree?

Sure, no problem. I'll queue this for 5.10 later this week.

Will

2020-09-02 11:57:33

by Hanjun Guo

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI/IORT: Code cleanups

On 2020/9/2 17:48, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:17:43PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> +Cc Will
>>
>> On 2020/8/18 17:16, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> On 2020/8/18 14:36, Zenghui Yu wrote:
>>>> * From v1 [1]:
>>>>    - As pointed out by Hanjun, remove two now unused inline functions.
>>>>      Compile tested with CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not selected.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>>>>
>>>> Zenghui Yu (2):
>>>>    ACPI/IORT: Drop the unused @ops of iort_add_device_replay()
>>>>    ACPI/IORT: Remove the unused inline functions
>>>>
>>>>   drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 10 ++--------
>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Nice cleanup.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>
>>
>> Will, would you mind taking this patch set via ARM64 tree?
>
> Sure, no problem. I'll queue this for 5.10 later this week.

Thanks!

Hanjun

2020-09-07 16:09:29

by Will Deacon

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI/IORT: Code cleanups

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 14:36:23 +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> * From v1 [1]:
> - As pointed out by Hanjun, remove two now unused inline functions.
> Compile tested with CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not selected.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>
> Zenghui Yu (2):
> ACPI/IORT: Drop the unused @ops of iort_add_device_replay()
> ACPI/IORT: Remove the unused inline functions
>
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/acpi), thanks!

[1/2] ACPI/IORT: Drop the unused @ops of iort_add_device_replay()
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/1ab64cf81489
[2/2] ACPI/IORT: Remove the unused inline functions
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/c2bea7a1a1c0

Cheers,
--
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev