Seems like everybody and their brother is maintaining a kernel patch set
these days :-).
Is there a page somewhere that explains the goals of each of the various
versions?
Thanks!
- Orion
I don't know of a website that tracks that stuff, but here goes my knowledge
of the different patchsets:
for the most part all of them are testing grounds for patches that someday
hope to be in the vanilla kernel
mm - Andrew Morton - vm related testing ground for dev tree
ck - Con Kolivas - desktop/interactivity patches
kj - Kernel Janitors - testing ground for kernel cleanups on development trees
mjb - Martin J Bligh - scalability stuff
wli - William Lee Irwin - other vm related stuff for dev tree that Andrew
Morton may not have time for
ac - Alan Cox - lately it's been a testing ground for new ide
lsm - Chris Wright - Linux Security Modules, provides a lightweight, general
purpose framework for access control
osdl - Stephen Hemminger, ? maybe enterprise stuff
laptop - Hanno B?ck - unproven laptop type patches
aa - Andrea Arcangeli - stable series vm stuff
dj - Dave Jones - cleanups/AGP
rmap - Rik van Riel - reverse mapping vm for 2.4
pgcl - William Lee Irwin - ?
Others? Oh yes. Maybe this is something that should be tracked on a webpage
somewhere.
--Brian Jackson
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 05:02 pm, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Seems like everybody and their brother is maintaining a kernel patch set
> these days :-).
>
> Is there a page somewhere that explains the goals of each of the various
> versions?
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Orion
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
OpenGFS -- http://opengfs.sourceforge.net
Home -- http://www.brianandsara.net
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:57:48PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
> pgcl - William Lee Irwin - ?
Page clustering. A vague attempt at a forward port of Hugh Dickins'
2.4.7 patch for the same purpose, WIP. I'd say it's more of one patch
than a patch set.
-- wli
Brian Jackson wrote:
>I don't know of a website that tracks that stuff, but here goes my knowledge
>of the different patchsets:
>
>for the most part all of them are testing grounds for patches that someday
>hope to be in the vanilla kernel
>
>mm - Andrew Morton - vm related testing ground for dev tree
>ck - Con Kolivas - desktop/interactivity patches
>kj - Kernel Janitors - testing ground for kernel cleanups on development trees
>mjb - Martin J Bligh - scalability stuff
>wli - William Lee Irwin - other vm related stuff for dev tree that Andrew
> Morton may not have time for
>ac - Alan Cox - lately it's been a testing ground for new ide
>
Actually the ac is often the test ground for new 2.4 fixes, and features.
>lsm - Chris Wright - Linux Security Modules, provides a lightweight, general
> purpose framework for access control
>osdl - Stephen Hemminger, ? maybe enterprise stuff
>laptop - Hanno B?ck - unproven laptop type patches
>aa - Andrea Arcangeli - stable series vm stuff
>dj - Dave Jones - cleanups/AGP
>rmap - Rik van Riel - reverse mapping vm for 2.4
>pgcl - William Lee Irwin - ?
>
>Others? Oh yes. Maybe this is something that should be tracked on a webpage
>somewhere.
>
>--Brian Jackson
>
>On Wednesday 25 June 2003 05:02 pm, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>
>>Seems like everybody and their brother is maintaining a kernel patch set
>>these days :-).
>>
>>Is there a page somewhere that explains the goals of each of the various
>>versions?
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>- Orion
>>
>>
>>-
>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>the body of a message to [email protected]
>>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 19:57, Brian Jackson wrote:
> I don't know of a website that tracks that stuff, but here goes my knowledge
> of the different patchsets:
>
> for the most part all of them are testing grounds for patches that someday
> hope to be in the vanilla kernel
>
> mm - Andrew Morton - vm related testing ground for dev tree
> ck - Con Kolivas - desktop/interactivity patches
> kj - Kernel Janitors - testing ground for kernel cleanups on development trees
> mjb - Martin J Bligh - scalability stuff
> wli - William Lee Irwin - other vm related stuff for dev tree that Andrew
> Morton may not have time for
> ac - Alan Cox - lately it's been a testing ground for new ide
> lsm - Chris Wright - Linux Security Modules, provides a lightweight, general
> purpose framework for access control
> osdl - Stephen Hemminger, ? maybe enterprise stuff
> laptop - Hanno B?ck - unproven laptop type patches
> aa - Andrea Arcangeli - stable series vm stuff
> dj - Dave Jones - cleanups/AGP
> rmap - Rik van Riel - reverse mapping vm for 2.4
> pgcl - William Lee Irwin - ?
To add a couple:
dis - Laptop-related (ACPI, swsusp, cpufreq, etc) patches
jp - Security/performance?
--
Disconnect <[email protected]>
http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/index.php3#trees has a few of them
Maybe you could alert the web maintainers to the entries in this thread?
:-)
Peter Ndikuwera
Digital Solutions
Uganda
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 01:02, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Seems like everybody and their brother is maintaining a kernel patch set
> these days :-).
>
> Is there a page somewhere that explains the goals of each of the various
> versions?
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Orion
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/